Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Women's Mental Health 2/2016

01-04-2016 | Original Article

Routine antenatal maternal screening for current mental health: evaluation of a change in the use of the Edinburgh Depression Scale in clinical practice

Authors: Stephen Matthey, Kay Souter, Kylie Mortimer, Christine Stephens, Adele Sheridan-Magro

Published in: Archives of Women's Mental Health | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

A hospital antenatal clinic conducting routine psychosocial screening changed the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) referral criterion for determining which women needed to be referred to a multidisciplinary meeting health professional (“Safe Start meeting”). The criterion was changed from a score of 10 or more to 13 or more, when no other psychosocial risks were present. Women scoring 10–12 on the EDS, with no other psychosocial risks, were now informed they should contact the Social Work Department if they had issues they wanted to discuss with a health professional. The study evaluated the impact of this change in EDS clinical practice. Records were audited over a 20-month period. In addition, 20 women scoring in this EDS marginal range (10–12), with no other psychosocial risks, participated in a telephone interview to ascertain if they should have been referred to the Safe Start meeting. Of 174 eligible women who scored in the marginal EDS range, none had contacted the Social Work Department. In addition, none of the 20 women interviewed indicated that they would have wanted to talk further with a health professional. This change in clinical practice reduced monthly referrals to the Safe Start meeting by about 20 %. There was a linear relationship between the increasing EDS category scores and the likelihood of psychosocial risks being endorsed. Increasing the automatic referral EDS cutoff score from 10 or more to 13 or more does not appear to result in women “in need” being missed. The reduction in referrals allowed more time in the Safe Start meeting to be devoted to women with greater needs.
Literature
go back to reference Bunevicius A, Kusminskas L, Pop VJ, Pedersen CA, Bunevicius R (2009) Screening for antenatal depression with the Edinburgh Depression Scale. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 30:238–243CrossRef Bunevicius A, Kusminskas L, Pop VJ, Pedersen CA, Bunevicius R (2009) Screening for antenatal depression with the Edinburgh Depression Scale. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 30:238–243CrossRef
go back to reference Cox J, Holden J, Sagovsky R (1987) Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10 item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 150:782–786CrossRefPubMed Cox J, Holden J, Sagovsky R (1987) Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10 item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 150:782–786CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Elliott SA, Gerrard J, Ashton C, Cox JL (2001) Training health visitors to reduce levels of depression after childbirth: an evaluation. J Ment Health 10:613–625CrossRef Elliott SA, Gerrard J, Ashton C, Cox JL (2001) Training health visitors to reduce levels of depression after childbirth: an evaluation. J Ment Health 10:613–625CrossRef
go back to reference Kozinszky Z, Dudas RB (2015) Validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for the antenatal period. J Affect Disord 176:95–105CrossRefPubMed Kozinszky Z, Dudas RB (2015) Validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for the antenatal period. J Affect Disord 176:95–105CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lee DTS, Yip ASK, Chan SSM, Tsui MHY, Wong WS, Chung TKH (2003) Postdelivery screening for postpartum depression. Psychosom Med 65:357–361CrossRefPubMed Lee DTS, Yip ASK, Chan SSM, Tsui MHY, Wong WS, Chung TKH (2003) Postdelivery screening for postpartum depression. Psychosom Med 65:357–361CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Matthey S, Phillips J, White T, Glossop P, Hopper U, Panasetis P, Petridis A, Larkin M, Barnett B (2004) Routine psychosocial assessment of women in the antenatal period: frequency of risk factors and implications for clinical services. Arch Womens Ment Health 7:223–229CrossRefPubMed Matthey S, Phillips J, White T, Glossop P, Hopper U, Panasetis P, Petridis A, Larkin M, Barnett B (2004) Routine psychosocial assessment of women in the antenatal period: frequency of risk factors and implications for clinical services. Arch Womens Ment Health 7:223–229CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Matthey S, Ross-Hamid C (2012) Repeat testing on the Edinburgh Depression Scale and the HADS-A in pregnancy: differentiating between transient and enduring distress. J Affect Disord 141:213–221CrossRefPubMed Matthey S, Ross-Hamid C (2012) Repeat testing on the Edinburgh Depression Scale and the HADS-A in pregnancy: differentiating between transient and enduring distress. J Affect Disord 141:213–221CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Matthey S, Valenti B, Souter K, Ross-Hamid C (2013) Comparison of four self-report measures, and a generic mood question, to screen for anxiety during pregnancy in English-speaking women. J Affect Disord 148:347–351, + corrigendum Matthey, S. (2014). J Affect Disord 155: 307 CrossRefPubMed Matthey S, Valenti B, Souter K, Ross-Hamid C (2013) Comparison of four self-report measures, and a generic mood question, to screen for anxiety during pregnancy in English-speaking women. J Affect Disord 148:347–351, + corrigendum Matthey, S. (2014). J Affect Disord 155: 307 CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Matthey S, White T, Phillips J, Taouk R, Chee TT, Barnett B (2005) Acceptability of routine antenatal psychosocial assessments to women from English and non-English speaking backgrounds. Arch Womens Mental Health 8:171–180CrossRef Matthey S, White T, Phillips J, Taouk R, Chee TT, Barnett B (2005) Acceptability of routine antenatal psychosocial assessments to women from English and non-English speaking backgrounds. Arch Womens Mental Health 8:171–180CrossRef
go back to reference Milgrom J, Mendelsohn J, Gemmill AW (2011) Does postnatal depression screening work? Throwing out the bathwater, keeping the baby. J Affect Disord 132:301–320CrossRefPubMed Milgrom J, Mendelsohn J, Gemmill AW (2011) Does postnatal depression screening work? Throwing out the bathwater, keeping the baby. J Affect Disord 132:301–320CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Miller LS, Boyd BJ, Chernov AJ (2004) Improving the identification and treatment of postpartum depression in a managed care organization. J Clin Outcomes Manag 11:157–161 Miller LS, Boyd BJ, Chernov AJ (2004) Improving the identification and treatment of postpartum depression in a managed care organization. J Clin Outcomes Manag 11:157–161
go back to reference Murray D, Cox JL (1990) Screening for depression during pregnancy with the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EPDS). J Reprod Infant Psychol 8:99–107CrossRef Murray D, Cox JL (1990) Screening for depression during pregnancy with the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EPDS). J Reprod Infant Psychol 8:99–107CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Routine antenatal maternal screening for current mental health: evaluation of a change in the use of the Edinburgh Depression Scale in clinical practice
Authors
Stephen Matthey
Kay Souter
Kylie Mortimer
Christine Stephens
Adele Sheridan-Magro
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1434-1816
Electronic ISSN: 1435-1102
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-015-0570-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Archives of Women's Mental Health 2/2016 Go to the issue