Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Refractive Surgery

Role of preoperative cycloplegic refraction in LASIK treatment of hyperopia

Authors: Andreas Frings, Johannes Steinberg, Vasyl Druchkiv, Stephan J. Linke, Toam Katz

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have suggested that, to improve refractive predictability in hyperopic LASIK treatments, preoperative cycloplegic or manifest refraction, or a combination of both, could be used in the laser nomogram. We set out to investigate (1) the prevalence of a high difference between manifest and cycloplegic spherical equivalent in hyperopic eyes preoperatively, and (2) the related predictability of postoperative keratometry.

Methods

Retrospective cross-sectional data analysis of consecutive treated 186 eyes from 186 consecutive hyperopic patients (mean age 42 [±12] years) were analyzed. Excimer ablation for all eyes was performed using a mechanical microkeratome (SBK, Moria, France) and an Allegretto excimer laser platform. Two groups were defined according to the difference between manifest and cycloplegic spherical equivalent which was defined as ≥1.00 diopter (D); the data was analyzed according to refractive outcome in terms of refractive predictability, efficacy, and safety.

Results

In 24 eyes (13 %), a preoperative difference of ≥1.00D between manifest spherical equivalent and cycloplegic spherical equivalent (= MCD) occurred. With increasing preoperative MCD, the postoperative achieved spherical equivalent showed hyperopic regression after 3 months. There was no statistically significant effect of age (accommodation) or optical zone size on the achieved spherical equivalent.

Conclusions

A difference of ≥1.00D occurs in about 13 % of hyperopia cases. We suggest that hyperopic correction should be based on the manifest spherical equivalent in eyes with preoperative MCD <1.00D. If the preoperative MCD is ≥1.00D, treatment may produce manifest undercorrection, and therefore we advise that the patient should be warrned about lower predictability, and suggest basing conclusions on the arithmetic mean calculated from the preoperative manifest and cycloplegic spheres.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gatinel D, Malet J, Hoang-Xuan T, Azar DT (2004) Corneal asphericity change after excimer laser hyperopic surgery: theoretical effects on corneal profiles and corresponding Zernike expansions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:1349–1359CrossRefPubMed Gatinel D, Malet J, Hoang-Xuan T, Azar DT (2004) Corneal asphericity change after excimer laser hyperopic surgery: theoretical effects on corneal profiles and corresponding Zernike expansions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:1349–1359CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Huang D, Tang M, Shekhar R (2003) Mathematical model of corneal surface smoothing after laser refractive surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 135:267–278CrossRefPubMed Huang D, Tang M, Shekhar R (2003) Mathematical model of corneal surface smoothing after laser refractive surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 135:267–278CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Roberts C (2002) Biomechanics of the cornea and wavefront-guided laser refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 18:589–592 Roberts C (2002) Biomechanics of the cornea and wavefront-guided laser refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 18:589–592
4.
go back to reference Alió J, Galal A, Ayala MJ, Artola A (2006) Hyperopic LASIK with Esiris/Schwind technology. J Refract Surg 22:772–781PubMed Alió J, Galal A, Ayala MJ, Artola A (2006) Hyperopic LASIK with Esiris/Schwind technology. J Refract Surg 22:772–781PubMed
5.
go back to reference Llovet F, Galal A, Benitez-del-Castillo JM, Ortega J, Martin C, Baviera J (2009) One-year results of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1156–1165CrossRefPubMed Llovet F, Galal A, Benitez-del-Castillo JM, Ortega J, Martin C, Baviera J (2009) One-year results of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1156–1165CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Waring GO 3rd, Fant B, Stevens G, Phillips S, Fischer J, Tanchel N, Schanzer C, Narvaez J, Chayet A (2008) Laser in situ keratomileusis for spherical hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism using the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser. J Refract Surg 24:123–136PubMed Waring GO 3rd, Fant B, Stevens G, Phillips S, Fischer J, Tanchel N, Schanzer C, Narvaez J, Chayet A (2008) Laser in situ keratomileusis for spherical hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism using the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser. J Refract Surg 24:123–136PubMed
7.
go back to reference Aslanides IM, Mukherjee AN (2013) Adjuvant corneal crosslinking to prevent hyperopic LASIK regression. Clin Ophthalmol 7:637–641PubMedPubMedCentral Aslanides IM, Mukherjee AN (2013) Adjuvant corneal crosslinking to prevent hyperopic LASIK regression. Clin Ophthalmol 7:637–641PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Spadea L, Sabetti L, D’Alessandri L, Balestrazzi E (2006) Photorefractive keratectomy and LASIK for the correction of hyperopia: 2-year follow-up. J Refract Surg 22:131–136PubMed Spadea L, Sabetti L, D’Alessandri L, Balestrazzi E (2006) Photorefractive keratectomy and LASIK for the correction of hyperopia: 2-year follow-up. J Refract Surg 22:131–136PubMed
9.
go back to reference Cobo-Soriano R, Llovet F, González-López F, Domingo B, Gómez-Sanz F, Baviera J (2002) Factors that influence outcomes of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1530–1538CrossRefPubMed Cobo-Soriano R, Llovet F, González-López F, Domingo B, Gómez-Sanz F, Baviera J (2002) Factors that influence outcomes of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1530–1538CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Zaldivar R, Oscherow S, Bains HS (2005) Five techniques for improving outcomes of hyperopic LASIK. J Refract Surg 21:628–632 Zaldivar R, Oscherow S, Bains HS (2005) Five techniques for improving outcomes of hyperopic LASIK. J Refract Surg 21:628–632
11.
go back to reference Zadok D, Raifkup F, Landau D, Frucht-Pery J (2003) Long-term evaluation of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2181–2188CrossRefPubMed Zadok D, Raifkup F, Landau D, Frucht-Pery J (2003) Long-term evaluation of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2181–2188CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mrochen M, Donitzky C, Wüllner C, Löffler J (2004) Wavefront-optimized ablation profiles: theoretical background. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:775–785CrossRefPubMed Mrochen M, Donitzky C, Wüllner C, Löffler J (2004) Wavefront-optimized ablation profiles: theoretical background. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:775–785CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Torricelli AA, Bechara SJ, Wilson SE (2014) Screening of refractive surgery candidates for LASIK and PRK. Cornea 33:1051–1055CrossRefPubMed Torricelli AA, Bechara SJ, Wilson SE (2014) Screening of refractive surgery candidates for LASIK and PRK. Cornea 33:1051–1055CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Role of preoperative cycloplegic refraction in LASIK treatment of hyperopia
Authors
Andreas Frings
Johannes Steinberg
Vasyl Druchkiv
Stephan J. Linke
Toam Katz
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3308-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 7/2016 Go to the issue