Published in:
01-11-2021 | Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder, Retroperitoneum
Robustness and performance of radiomic features in diagnosing cystic renal masses
Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 11/2021
Login to get accessAbstract
Purpose
We study the inter-reader variability in manual delineation of cystic renal masses (CRMs) presented in computerized tomography (CT) images and its effect on the classification performance of a machine learning algorithm in distinguishing benign from potentially malignant CRMs. In addition, we assessed whether the inclusion of higher-order robust radiomic features improves the classification performance over the use of first-order features.
Methods
230 CRMs were independently delineated by two radiologists. Through a combination of random fluctuations, dilation, and erosion operations over the original region of interests (ROIs), we generated four additional sets of synthetic ROIs to capture the inter-reader variability realistically, as confirmed by dice coefficient measurements and visual assessment. We then identified the robust features based on the intra-class coefficient (ICC > 0.85) across these datasets. We applied a tenfold stratified cross-validation (CV) to train and test the performance of the random forest model for the classification of CRMs into benign and potentially malignant.
Results
The mean area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.87, 0.82, 0.90, 0.85, and 0.93, respectively. With the usage of first-order features alone, the corresponding values were nearly identical.
Conclusion
AUC ranged for the robust and uncorrelated features from 0.83 ± 0.09 to 0.93 ± 0.04 and for the first-order features from 0.84 ± 0.09 to 0.91 ± 0.04. Our study indicates that the first-order features alone are sufficient for the classification of CRMs, and that inclusion of higher-order features does not necessarily improve performance.