Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2007

01-10-2007

Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy

Authors: A. L. Rawlings, J. H. Woodland, R. K. Vegunta, D. L. Crawford

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study compared the experience and cost of the DaVinci Robotic system and laparoscopy for colon resections.

Methods

For this study, 30 consecutive robotic and 27 consecutive laparoscopic colectomies were divided into right and sigmoid colectomies for analysis. Comparisons included indications for surgery, gender, age, body mass index (BMI), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of operation, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, operating room (OR) cost, OR personnel cost, OR supply cost, OR time cost, and total hospital cost.

Results

The comparison groups were similar in indications for surgery, gender, age, BMI, EBL, and LOS. The right colectomies included 17 robotic and 15 laparoscopic procedures. An intracorporeal anastomosis was performed in the robotic cases, and an extracorporeal anastomosis was performed in the laparoscopic cases. The total case time was 218.9 min for the robotic and 169.2 min for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.002). The total hospital cost was $9,255 for the robotic and $8,073 for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.430). The total OR cost was $5,823 for the robotic and $4,339 for the laparoscopic procedures (p < 0.000). The sigmoid colectomies included 13 robotic and 12 laparoscopic procedures. The robotic and laparoscopic cases were managed in similar sequence. The total case time was 225.2 min for the robotic and 199.4 min for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.128). The total hospital cost was $12,335 for the robotic and $10,697 for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.735). The total OR cost was $6,059 for the robotic and $4,974 for the laparoscopic procedures (p = 0.068). The complications in the robotic groups were more numerous, but were not attributable to equipment.

Conclusions

The comparison groups were similar. The robotic cases were significantly longer for right colectomies because of the intracorporeal anastomosis instead of the extracorporeal anastomosis performed in the laparoscopy cases. Every cost category was higher for the robotic cases. The right colectomies showed significant increases in total OR cost, OR personnel cost, OR supply cost, and OR time cost. The sigmoid colectomies had significant increases in OR personnel cost and OR supply cost. The total hospital cost was higher for the robotic groups, but the difference was not statistically significant.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Anvari M, Birch D, Bamehriz F, Gryfe R, Chapman T (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14: 311–315PubMedCrossRef Anvari M, Birch D, Bamehriz F, Gryfe R, Chapman T (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14: 311–315PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ballantyne G, Moll F (2003) The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83: 1293–1304PubMedCrossRef Ballantyne G, Moll F (2003) The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83: 1293–1304PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Braumann C, Jacobi C, Menenakos C, Borchert U, Rueckert J, Mueller J (2005) Computer–assisted laparoscopic colon resection with the DaVinci system: our first experiences. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 1820–1827PubMedCrossRef Braumann C, Jacobi C, Menenakos C, Borchert U, Rueckert J, Mueller J (2005) Computer–assisted laparoscopic colon resection with the DaVinci system: our first experiences. Dis Colon Rectum 48: 1820–1827PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cadiere G, Himpens J, Germay O, Izizaw R, Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Capelluto E, Bruyns J (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25: 1467–1477PubMed Cadiere G, Himpens J, Germay O, Izizaw R, Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Capelluto E, Bruyns J (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25: 1467–1477PubMed
5.
go back to reference Camarillo D, Krummel T, Salisbury J (2004) Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg 188: 2S–15SPubMedCrossRef Camarillo D, Krummel T, Salisbury J (2004) Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg 188: 2S–15SPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19: 117–119PubMedCrossRef Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda N, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P (2005) Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19: 117–119PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C, Guidolin D (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 2162–2168PubMedCrossRef D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C, Guidolin D (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 2162–2168PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Delaney C, Lynch A, Senagore A, Fazio V (2003) Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 46: 1633–1639PubMedCrossRef Delaney C, Lynch A, Senagore A, Fazio V (2003) Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 46: 1633–1639PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hazey J, Melvin W (2004) Robot-assisted general surgery. Semin Lap Surg 11: 107–112 Hazey J, Melvin W (2004) Robot-assisted general surgery. Semin Lap Surg 11: 107–112
11.
go back to reference Horgan S, Vanuno D (2001) Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 11: 415–419CrossRef Horgan S, Vanuno D (2001) Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 11: 415–419CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Melvin W, Needleman J, Krause K, Schneider C, Wolf R, Michler R, Ellison E (2002) Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery: initial experience in foregut surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 1790–1792PubMedCrossRef Melvin W, Needleman J, Krause K, Schneider C, Wolf R, Michler R, Ellison E (2002) Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery: initial experience in foregut surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 1790–1792PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Perez A, Zinner M, Ashley S, Brooks D, Whang E (2003) What is the value of telerobotic technology in gastrointestinal surgery? Surg Endosc 17: 811–813PubMedCrossRef Perez A, Zinner M, Ashley S, Brooks D, Whang E (2003) What is the value of telerobotic technology in gastrointestinal surgery? Surg Endosc 17: 811–813PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rawlings A, Woodland J, Crawford D (2006) Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 20: 1713–1718PubMedCrossRef Rawlings A, Woodland J, Crawford D (2006) Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 20: 1713–1718PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Talamini M, Campbell K, Stanfield C (2002) Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: early experience and system description. J Laparendosc Adv Surg Tech 12: 225–232CrossRef Talamini M, Campbell K, Stanfield C (2002) Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: early experience and system description. J Laparendosc Adv Surg Tech 12: 225–232CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Talamini M, Chapman S, Horgan S, Melvin W (2003) A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 17: 1521–1524PubMedCrossRef Talamini M, Chapman S, Horgan S, Melvin W (2003) A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 17: 1521–1524PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Weber P, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne G (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 1689–1696PubMedCrossRef Weber P, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne G (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45: 1689–1696PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy
Authors
A. L. Rawlings
J. H. Woodland
R. K. Vegunta
D. L. Crawford
Publication date
01-10-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9231-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2007 Go to the issue