Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2010

01-08-2010 | Original Article

Robotic surgical management of endometrial cancer in octogenarians and nonagenarians: analysis of perioperative outcomes and review of the literature

Authors: M. Patrick Lowe, Saurabh Kumar, Peter R. Johnson, Scott A. Kamelle, Donald H. Chamberlain, Todd D. Tillmanns

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The primary aim of this article is to report the outcomes of octogenarians and nonagenarians who have undergone robotic surgery for endometrial cancer. A multi-institutional research consortium was created to evaluate the utility of robotics for gynecologic surgery (benign and malignant). IRB approval was obtained at each institution. A multi-institutional HIPPA compliant database was then created and analyzed for all patients that underwent robotic-assisted surgery with staging for endometrial cancer between the April 2003 and January 2009. In total, 395 patients were identified. A subset of patients between the ages of 80 and 95 years were then identified and analyzed for demographic data and perioperative outcomes. Twenty-seven patients in this age group were identified who underwent robotic-assisted hysterectomy and staging. The median age was 84, and median body mass index was 28. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension were identified in 22 and 74% of patients, respectively. Over one-half (56%) of the patients reported a prior abdominal surgery. Final pathological analysis demonstrated that 88% of all patients had either Stage I or II disease. The median operative time was 192 min. The median estimated blood loss was 50 cc, and the median lymph node count was 16. The median hospital stay was 1.0 day. The overall intraoperative and postoperative complication rate was 7.4 and 33%, respectively. No patient received a blood transfusion. There was one conversion to laparotomy (3.7%). A comparison of the outcomes of the elderly cohort to those of all patients in the database (control group) revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, nodal yield, or conversion rate. Intraoperative complications were statistically similar between the groups; however, postoperative complications were significantly higher in the elderly cohort. We conclude that robotic surgery is safe, feasible, and expands surgical options for octogenarians and nonagenarians diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Age should not be considered a contraindication for robotic surgical management of patients with endometrial cancer.

Literature
  1. U.S. Census Bureau (2000) The 65 years and over population: 2000. Available at: http://​www.​census.​gov/​prod/​2001pubs/​c2kbr01-10.​pdf. Internet release date: October 2001
  2. Morrow CP, Curtin JP, Townsend DE (1993) Synopsis of gynecologic oncology, 4th edn. Churchill Livingston, New York
  3. Scribner D, Walker J, Johnson G, McMeekin S, Gold M, Mannel R (2001) Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible? Gynecol Oncol 83:563–568View ArticlePubMed
  4. Moore KN, Grainger LS, Smith C, Lanneau M, Walker JL, Gold MA, McMeekin DS (2007) Pathologic findings and outcomes for octogenarians presenting with uterine malignancy. Gynecol Oncol 106:572–578View ArticlePubMed
  5. Magrina J (2005) Outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for endometrial cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17:343–346View ArticlePubMed
  6. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, Eisenkop SM, Schlaerth JB, Mannel RS, Spiegel G, Baraket R, Pearl ML, Sharma SK (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: gynecologic oncology group study LAP2. JCO 27:5331–5336
  7. Tillmanns T, Lowe MP (2007) Update on minimally invasive surgery on the management of gynecologic malignancies: focus on robotic laparoscopic systems. Commun Oncol 4:411–416
  8. Lowe MP, Chamberlin DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns JT (2009) Gynecologic oncology robotic surgical consortium: a multi-institutional experience with robotic hysterectomy for early stage endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 114:236–243View ArticlePubMed
  9. Hoekstra AV, Thodla JA, Rademaker A, Singh DK, Buttin BB, Lurain JR, Schink JC, Lowe MP (2009) Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: the effect on fellow training. Gynecol Oncol 114:168–172View ArticlePubMed
  10. Hoekstra AV, Thodla JA, Rademaker A, Singh DK, Buttin BB, Lurain JR, Schink JC, Lowe MP. The impact of robotics on practice management of endometrial cancer: transitioning from traditional surgery. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2009; 5:392-397
  11. Veljovich D, Paley P, Drescher C, Everett E, Shah C, Peters W (2008) Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:679.e1–679.e19
  12. Boggess J, Gehrig P, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner E, Fowler W (2008) A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Amer J Obstet Gynecol 199:360.e1–360.e9
  13. DeNardis SA, Holloway RW, Bigsby GE IV, Pikaart DP, Ahmad S, Finkler NJ (2008) Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 111:412–417View ArticlePubMed
  14. Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Richardson DL, Valmadre S, Carlson MJ, Phillips GS, Fowler JM (2008) Robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 112:1207–1213PubMed
  15. Jairam-Thodla A, Hoekstra AV, Lowe MP (2008) A comparison of post-operative analgesic use in 3 different surgical staging modalities for early stage endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:38sView Article
  16. Susini T, Massi G, Amunni G, Carriero C, Marchionni M, Taddei G, Scarselli G (2005) Vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer in the elderly. Gynecol Oncol 96:363–367View Article
  17. Lachance JA, Everett EN, Greer B, Mandel L, Swisher E, Tamimi H, Goff B (2006) The effect of age on clinical/pathologic features, surgical morbidity, and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 101:470–475View ArticlePubMed
  18. Ries EM, Kosary CL, Hankey BF et al (1975–2000) SEER cancer statistics review. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda
  19. Hutchins LF, Unger JM, Crowley JJ et al (1999) Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer treatment trials. N Engl J Med 341:2061View ArticlePubMed
  20. Yee KW, Pater JL, Pho L et al (2003) Enrollment of older patients in cancer treatment trials in Canada: why is age a barrier? J Clin Oncol 21:1618View ArticlePubMed
  21. Trimble El, Carter CL, Cain D et al (1994) Representation of older patients in cancer treatment trials. Cancer 74:2208View ArticlePubMed
Metadata
Title
Robotic surgical management of endometrial cancer in octogenarians and nonagenarians: analysis of perioperative outcomes and review of the literature
Authors
M. Patrick Lowe
Saurabh Kumar
Peter R. Johnson
Scott A. Kamelle
Donald H. Chamberlain
Todd D. Tillmanns
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-010-0195-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2010 Go to the issue