Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Scientific Report

Robotic Liver Resection For Primary Hepatolithiasis: Is It Beneficial?

Authors: Kit-fai Lee, Anthony K. W. Fong, Charing C. N. Chong, Sunny Y. S. Cheung, John Wong, Paul B. S. Lai

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Primary hepatolithiasis is a disease characterized by primary biliary ductal abnormality with stone formation predominantly within the intrahepatic bile ducts. Its management is difficult, but liver resection has emerged as a promising treatment option.

Methods

Robotic liver resection (RLR) has been adopted in our center for the management of patients with hepatolithiasis. The operative and short-term outcomes of this cohort of patients were compared with a historical cohort of patients using open approach (OLR). A subgroup analysis was performed for left lateral sectionectomy.

Results

Between September 2010 and April 2015, 15 RLRs were performed on patients with primary hepatolithiasis. The historical cohort consisted of 42 OLRs with operation done between January 2005 and January 2014. No differences were found in patient demographics, disease characteristics, or types of resection. No operative deaths occurred, and no difference was seen in complication rates. RLR had significantly less blood loss (100 vs. 235 ml; p = 0.011) and shorter hospital stays (6 vs. 8 days; p = 0.003). After a median follow-up of 19.4 months for RLRs and 79.2 months for OLRs (p < 0.001), there were no differences in residual stone rate, recurrent stone rate, or rate of recurrent cholangitis. Subgroup analysis of lateral sectionectomy (10 RLRs vs. 27 OLRs) revealed similar outcomes, i.e., less blood loss and shorter hospital stays in RLR.

Conclusions

Robotic liver resection reduces blood loss and shortens hospital stays compared with OLR. A longer follow-up is needed to assess the long-term outcomes of RLR regarding prevention of recurrent stones and cholangitis.
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference Nakayama F, Furusawa T, Nakama T (1980) Hepatolithiasis in Japan: present status. Am J Surg 139:216–220CrossRefPubMed Nakayama F, Furusawa T, Nakama T (1980) Hepatolithiasis in Japan: present status. Am J Surg 139:216–220CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lo CM, Fan ST, Wong J (1997) The changing epidemiology of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. Hong Kong Med J 3:302–304PubMed Lo CM, Fan ST, Wong J (1997) The changing epidemiology of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. Hong Kong Med J 3:302–304PubMed
5.
go back to reference Chen C, Huang M, Yang J et al (2005) Reappraisal of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotomy for primary hepatolithiasis. Surg Endosc 19:505–509CrossRefPubMed Chen C, Huang M, Yang J et al (2005) Reappraisal of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotomy for primary hepatolithiasis. Surg Endosc 19:505–509CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Chen DW, Poon RTP, Liu CL et al (2004) Immediate and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. Surgery 135:386–393CrossRefPubMed Chen DW, Poon RTP, Liu CL et al (2004) Immediate and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. Surgery 135:386–393CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Lee TY, Chen YL, Chang HC et al (2007) Outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. World J Surg 31(3):479–482CrossRefPubMed Lee TY, Chen YL, Chang HC et al (2007) Outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. World J Surg 31(3):479–482CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Al-Sukhni W, Gallinger S, Pratzer A et al (2008) Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis with hepatolithiasis—the role of surgical therapy in North America. J Gastrointest Surg 12:496–503CrossRefPubMed Al-Sukhni W, Gallinger S, Pratzer A et al (2008) Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis with hepatolithiasis—the role of surgical therapy in North America. J Gastrointest Surg 12:496–503CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nuzzo G, Clemente G, Giovannini I et al (2008) Liver resection for primary intrahepatic stones: a single-centre experience. Arch Surg 143:570–573CrossRefPubMed Nuzzo G, Clemente G, Giovannini I et al (2008) Liver resection for primary intrahepatic stones: a single-centre experience. Arch Surg 143:570–573CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lee KF, Chong CN, Ng D et al (2009) Outcome of surgical treatment for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: a single-centre study. HPB (Oxford) 11:75–80CrossRef Lee KF, Chong CN, Ng D et al (2009) Outcome of surgical treatment for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: a single-centre study. HPB (Oxford) 11:75–80CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Uenishi T, Hamba H, Takemura S et al (2009) Outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatolithiasis. Am J Surg 198:199–202CrossRefPubMed Uenishi T, Hamba H, Takemura S et al (2009) Outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatolithiasis. Am J Surg 198:199–202CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tang CN, Tai CK, Siu WT et al (2005) Laparoscopic treatment of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:243–248CrossRefPubMed Tang CN, Tai CK, Siu WT et al (2005) Laparoscopic treatment of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:243–248CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cai X, Wang Y, Yu H et al (2007) Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: a feasibility and safety study in 29 patients. Surg Endosc 21:1074–1078CrossRefPubMed Cai X, Wang Y, Yu H et al (2007) Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: a feasibility and safety study in 29 patients. Surg Endosc 21:1074–1078CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Strasberg SM (2005) Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:351–355CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM (2005) Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:351–355CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Namgoong JM, Kim KH et al (2014) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open left hemihepatectomy for left-sided hepatolithiasis. Int J Med Sci 11:127–133CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Namgoong JM, Kim KH et al (2014) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open left hemihepatectomy for left-sided hepatolithiasis. Int J Med Sci 11:127–133CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Ye X, Ni K, Zhou X et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open left hemihepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. J Surg Res 199:402–406CrossRefPubMed Ye X, Ni K, Zhou X et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open left hemihepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. J Surg Res 199:402–406CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ding G, Cai W, Qin M (2015) Pure laparoscopic versus open liver resection in treatment of hepatolithiasis within the left lobes: a randomized trial study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percut Tech 25:392–394CrossRef Ding G, Cai W, Qin M (2015) Pure laparoscopic versus open liver resection in treatment of hepatolithiasis within the left lobes: a randomized trial study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percut Tech 25:392–394CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robotic Liver Resection For Primary Hepatolithiasis: Is It Beneficial?
Authors
Kit-fai Lee
Anthony K. W. Fong
Charing C. N. Chong
Sunny Y. S. Cheung
John Wong
Paul B. S. Lai
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3528-8

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

World Journal of Surgery 10/2016 Go to the issue