Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2018

01-09-2018 | Case Report

Robotic left lateral sectionectomy as stepwise approach for cirrhotic liver

Authors: Raphael L. C. Araujo, Luís Antônio de Castro, Fernando E. C. Fellipe, Diego Burgardt, Durval R. Wohnrath

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Laparoscopy is considered the gold standard approach to perform left lateral sectionectomy (LLS). Furthermore, laparoscopy for cirrhotic patients can reduce intraoperative bleeding and postoperative morbidity when compared to open surgery. Although robotic surgery is feasible for both minor and major liver resections, it remains a work in progress and only few series reported this approach for cirrhotic patients. We reported two cases of 62-year-old men, both with hepatitis C virus and alcoholic cirrhosis, but with compensated liver functions (MELD 9–10 and Child–Pugh A5–A6). The patients were diagnosed with a single lesion in the left lobe. Robotic LLS was performed using intraoperative ultrasound to confirm findings of pre-operative image, and linear staplers were used to control left lobe inflow and outflow. The specimens were removed through Pfannenstiel incision in both patients. Both procedures followed the same standardization. The total operative time was 250 and 151 min with estimated blood loss of 100 and 70 ml, respectively, for cases 1 and 2. The procedures were made without Pringle maneuver and postoperative course was uneventful with hospital discharge at third and fourth postoperative day, respectively. The pathology examination confirmed a 2.5- and 4.5-cm hepatocellular carcinoma, respectively; both presented negative margins and cirrhosis. Robotic LLS seems to be as feasible as conventional laparoscopic approach as a stepwise procedure in a robotic learning curve for liver resection. Its benefits can also be offered to selected cirrhotic patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629PubMed Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629PubMed
2.
go back to reference Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Twaij A, Pucher PH, Sodergren MH et al (2014) Laparoscopic vs open approach to resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with known cirrhosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 20:8274–8281CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Twaij A, Pucher PH, Sodergren MH et al (2014) Laparoscopic vs open approach to resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with known cirrhosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 20:8274–8281CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Yin Z, Fan X, Ye H et al (2013) Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1203–1215CrossRefPubMed Yin Z, Fan X, Ye H et al (2013) Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1203–1215CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nota CL, Rinkes IH, Molenaar IQ et al (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review and pooled analysis of minor and major hepatectomies. HPB 18:113–120CrossRefPubMed Nota CL, Rinkes IH, Molenaar IQ et al (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review and pooled analysis of minor and major hepatectomies. HPB 18:113–120CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kamath PS, Kim WR (2007) Advanced liver disease study G: the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Hepatology 45:797–805CrossRefPubMed Kamath PS, Kim WR (2007) Advanced liver disease study G: the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Hepatology 45:797–805CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL et al (1973) Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 60:646–649CrossRefPubMed Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL et al (1973) Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 60:646–649CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263:761–777CrossRefPubMed Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263:761–777CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Robotic left lateral sectionectomy as stepwise approach for cirrhotic liver
Authors
Raphael L. C. Araujo
Luís Antônio de Castro
Fernando E. C. Fellipe
Diego Burgardt
Durval R. Wohnrath
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0730-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2018 Go to the issue