Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2017

01-08-2017 | Dynamic Manuscript

Robotic cholecystectomy using Revo-i Model MSR-5000, the newly developed Korean robotic surgical system: a preclinical study

Authors: Jin Hong Lim, Woo Jung Lee, Dong Won Park, Hye Jin Yea, Se Hoon Kim, Chang Moo Kang

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard option for gastrointestinal surgeries. However, laparoscopic procedures require extended training times and are difficult for inexperienced surgeons. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery facilitates easy adaptation of laparoscopic procedures, but robotic surgical systems are expensive. In addition, their cost has remained high because there is currently only one manufacturer of commercially available systems. Recently, a new Korean robotic surgical system, Revo-i, has been developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of Revo-i by performing robotic cholecystectomy in a porcine model.

Methods

After approval by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Yonsei University Health System, cholecystectomy was performed in four pigs using the Revo-i robotic surgical system. Operative time and perioperative complications were recorded, and all animals were observed for postoperative complications for 2 weeks after surgery

Results

Robotic cholecystectomy was completed successfully and without gallbladder perforation in all cases. The mean operative time was 78 ± 12 min, the mean docking time was 4.5 ± 2.52 min, and the mean console time was 49.8 ± 14.17 min. There were no perioperative complications, and none of the animal used for the in vivo models exhibited abnormal behavior during the postoperative observation period.

Conclusions

These preliminary results verify the safety and efficacy of robotic cholecystectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system. Human trials are slated to begin accordingly.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Cioffi L, Langella S, Russolillo N, Belli A (2007) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results. Surg Endosc 21(11):2004–2011CrossRefPubMed Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Cioffi L, Langella S, Russolillo N, Belli A (2007) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results. Surg Endosc 21(11):2004–2011CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mochiki E, Nakabayashi T, Kamimura H, Haga N, Asao T, Kuwano H (2002) Gastrointestinal recovery and outcome after laparoscopy-assisted versus conventional open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. World J Surg 26(9):1145–1149CrossRefPubMed Mochiki E, Nakabayashi T, Kamimura H, Haga N, Asao T, Kuwano H (2002) Gastrointestinal recovery and outcome after laparoscopy-assisted versus conventional open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. World J Surg 26(9):1145–1149CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Zhang RC, Zhou YC, Mou YP, Huang CJ, Jin WW, Yan JF, Wang YX, Liao Y (2015) Laparoscopic versus open enucleation for pancreatic neoplasms: clinical outcomes and pancreatic function analysis. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4538-6 PubMedCentral Zhang RC, Zhou YC, Mou YP, Huang CJ, Jin WW, Yan JF, Wang YX, Liao Y (2015) Laparoscopic versus open enucleation for pancreatic neoplasms: clinical outcomes and pancreatic function analysis. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-015-4538-6 PubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, Lei WZ, Yu YY, Cheng Z, Li L, Shu Y, Wang TC (2004) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18(8):1211–1215CrossRefPubMed Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, Lei WZ, Yu YY, Cheng Z, Li L, Shu Y, Wang TC (2004) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18(8):1211–1215CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hawasli A, Lloyd LR (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The learning curve: report of 50 patients. Am Surg 57(8):542–544 (discussion 545) PubMed Hawasli A, Lloyd LR (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The learning curve: report of 50 patients. Am Surg 57(8):542–544 (discussion 545) PubMed
6.
go back to reference Jordan JA, Gallagher AG, McGuigan J, McClure N (2000) Randomly alternating image presentation during laparoscopic training leads to faster automation to the “fulcrum effect”. Endoscopy 32(4):317–321CrossRefPubMed Jordan JA, Gallagher AG, McGuigan J, McClure N (2000) Randomly alternating image presentation during laparoscopic training leads to faster automation to the “fulcrum effect”. Endoscopy 32(4):317–321CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nio D, Bemelman WA, Busch OR, Vrouenraets BC, Gouma DJ (2004) Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 18(3):379–382CrossRefPubMed Nio D, Bemelman WA, Busch OR, Vrouenraets BC, Gouma DJ (2004) Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 18(3):379–382CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O, Izizaw R, Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Capelluto E, Bruyns J (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25(11):1467–1477PubMed Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O, Izizaw R, Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Capelluto E, Bruyns J (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25(11):1467–1477PubMed
9.
go back to reference Fanfani F, Monterossi G, Fagotti A, Rossitto C, Alletti SG, Costantini B, Gallotta V, Selvaggi L, Restaino S, Scambia G (2015) The new robotic TELELAP ALF-X in gynecological surgery: single-center experience. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4187-9 PubMed Fanfani F, Monterossi G, Fagotti A, Rossitto C, Alletti SG, Costantini B, Gallotta V, Selvaggi L, Restaino S, Scambia G (2015) The new robotic TELELAP ALF-X in gynecological surgery: single-center experience. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-015-4187-9 PubMed
10.
go back to reference Yi B, Wang G, Li J, Jiang J, Son Z, Su H, Zhu S (2015) The first clinical use of domestically produced Chinese minimally invasive surgical robot system “Micro Hand S”. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4506-1 Yi B, Wang G, Li J, Jiang J, Son Z, Su H, Zhu S (2015) The first clinical use of domestically produced Chinese minimally invasive surgical robot system “Micro Hand S”. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-015-4506-1
11.
go back to reference Kang CM, Chi HS, Hyeung WJ, Kim KS, Choi JS, Lee WJ, Kim BR (2007) The first korean experience of telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the da vinci system. Yonsei Med J 48(3):540–545CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kang CM, Chi HS, Hyeung WJ, Kim KS, Choi JS, Lee WJ, Kim BR (2007) The first korean experience of telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the da vinci system. Yonsei Med J 48(3):540–545CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Schostek S, Binser MJ, Rieber F, Ho CN, Schurr MO, Buess GF (2010) Artificial tactile feedback can significantly improve tissue examination through remote palpation. Surg Endosc 24(9):2299–2307CrossRefPubMed Schostek S, Binser MJ, Rieber F, Ho CN, Schurr MO, Buess GF (2010) Artificial tactile feedback can significantly improve tissue examination through remote palpation. Surg Endosc 24(9):2299–2307CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Robotic cholecystectomy using Revo-i Model MSR-5000, the newly developed Korean robotic surgical system: a preclinical study
Authors
Jin Hong Lim
Woo Jung Lee
Dong Won Park
Hye Jin Yea
Se Hoon Kim
Chang Moo Kang
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5357-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2017 Go to the issue