Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Surgical Endoscopy
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2017

01-07-2017

Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in obese patients: a case-matched series

Authors: Jeffrey N. Harr, Samuel Luka, Aman Kankaria, Yen-Yi Juo, Samir Agarwal, Vincent Obias

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Reports demonstrate laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese patients is associated with higher conversion to laparotomy and complication rates. While several advantages of robotic-assisted surgery have been reported, outcomes in obese patients have not been adequately studied. Therefore, this study compares outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery in non-obese and obese patients.

Methods

A retrospective review of 331 consecutive robotic procedures performed at a single institution between 2009 and 2015 was performed. Patients were divided into non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) groups, and were clinically matched by gender, age, and procedure performed. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, operative time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay were examined.

Results

Following matching, each group included 108 patients comprised of 50 men and 58 women. Mean BMI was 24.6 ± 3.15 and 36.2 ± 5.67 kg/m2 (p < 0.0001), and the mean age was 59.2 ± 11.28 years for non-obese patients and 57.1 ± 12.44 for obese patients (p = 0.18). Surgeries included low anterior resection, right colectomy, left colectomy, sigmoid colectomy, excision of rectal endometriosis, total proctocolectomy, APR, subtotal colectomy, ileocecectomy, proctectomy, rectopexy, transanal excision of rectal mass, and colostomy site hernia repair. The mean operative time was 272.69 ± 115.43 and 282.42 ± 120.51 min (p = 0.55), estimated blood loss 195.23 ± 230.37 and 289.19 ± 509.27 mL (p = 0.08), conversion to laparotomy 6.48 and 9.26 % (p = 0.45), and length of stay 5.38 ± 4.94 and 4.56 ± 4.04 days (p = 0.18) for the non-obese and obese groups, respectively. Twenty of the non-obese patients had postoperative complications as compared to 27 of the obese patients (p = 0.30). However, the prevalence of wound complications was higher in obese patients (1.9 vs 9.3 %; p = 0.03).

Conclusion

There is no difference in conversion to laparotomy and overall complication rates in non-obese and obese patients undergoing robotic-assisted colorectal surgery. However, obesity is associated with a higher prevalence of wound complications. Robotic-assisted surgery may minimize conversion to laparotomy and complications typically seen in obese patients due to improved visualization, instrumentation, and ergonomics.
Literature
1.
Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124CrossRefPubMed
2.
Seishima R, Okabayashi K, Hasegawa H, Tsuruta M, Shigeta K, Matsui S, Yamada T, Kitagawa Y (2015) Is laparoscopic colorectal surgery beneficial for elderly patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 19:756–765CrossRefPubMed
3.
Schiphorst AH, Verweij NM, Pronk A, Borel Rinkes IH, Hamaker ME (2015) Non-surgical complications after laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer—A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(9):1118–1127CrossRefPubMed
4.
Laurent C, Leblanc F, Bretagnol F, Capdepont M, Rullier E (2008) Long-term wound advantages of the laparoscopic approach in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:903–908CrossRefPubMed
5.
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
6.
Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Helson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662 (discussion 662–664) CrossRefPubMed
7.
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicenter, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
8.
Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, Colon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRefPubMed
9.
Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, McCarter MD, Bentrem DJ (2009) Effect of body mass index on short-term outcomes after colectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg 208:53–61CrossRefPubMed
10.
Lascano CA, Kaidar-Person O, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R, Wexner SD (2006) Challenges of laparoscopic colectomy in the obese patient: a review. Am J Surg 192:357–365CrossRefPubMed
11.
Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, Frampton CM, Frizelle FA, Rieger NA, Smith JS, Solomon MJ, Stephens JH, Stevenson AR (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248:728–738CrossRefPubMed
12.
Van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed
13.
Yamamoto S, Fukunaga M, Miyajima N, Okuda J, Konishi F, Watanabe M, Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (2009) Impact of conversion on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic operation for rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1,073 patients. J Am Coll Surg 208:383–389CrossRefPubMed
14.
Pikarsky AJ, Saida Y, Yamaguchi T, Martinez S, Chen W, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2002) Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 16:855–858CrossRefPubMed
15.
Senagore A, Delaney C, Madboulay K (2003) Laparocopic colectomy in obese and nonobese patients. J Gastrointest Surg 7:558–561CrossRefPubMed
16.
Bege T, Lelong B, Francon D, Turrini O, Guiramand J, Delpero JR (2009) Impact of obesity on short-term results of laparoscopic rectal cancer resection. Surg Endosc 23:1460–1464CrossRefPubMed
17.
Kamoun S, Alves A, Bretagnol F, Lefevre JH, Valleur P, Panis Y (2009) Outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: a case-matched study of 180 patients. Am J Surg 198:450–455CrossRefPubMed
18.
Harr JN, Juo YY, Luka S, Agarwal S, Brody F, Obias V (2016) Incisional and port-site hernias following robotic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30:3505–3510CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
Khoury W, Kiran RP, Jessie T, Geisler D, Remzi FH (2010) Is the laparoscopic approach to colectomy safe for the morbidly obese? Surg Endosc 24:1336–1340CrossRefPubMed
21.
Dostalik J, Martinek L, Vavra P, Andel P, Gunka I, Gunkova P (2005) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese patients. Obes Surg 15:1328–1331CrossRefPubMed
22.
Healy LA, Ryan AM, Sutton E, Younger K, Mehigan B, Stephens R, Reynolds JV (2010) Impact of obesity on surgical and oncological outcomes in the management of colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:1293–1299CrossRefPubMed
23.
Sarli L, Rollo A, Cecchini S, Regina G, Sansebastiano G, Marchesi F, Veronesi L, Ferro M, Roncoroni L (2009) Impact of obesity on laparoscopic-assisted left colectomy in different stages of the learning curve. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:114–117CrossRefPubMed
24.
Keller DS, Madhoun N, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Ibarra A, Tahilramani R, Haas EM (2016) Effect of BMI on short-term outcomes with robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc 20:488–493
25.
Bhama AR, Obias V, Welch KB, Vandewarker JF, Cleary RK (2016) A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQUIP) database. Surg Endosc 30:1576–1584CrossRefPubMed
26.
Tam MS, Kaoutzanis C, Mullard AJ, Regenbogen SE, Franz MG, Hendren S, Krapohl G, Vanewarker JF, Lampman RM, Cleary RK (2016) A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30:455–463CrossRefPubMed
27.
Park JW, Lim SW, Choi HS, Jeong Sy OhJH, Lim SB (2010) The impact of obesity on outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Asians. Surg Endosc 24:1679–1685CrossRefPubMed
28.
Cecchini S, Cavazzini E, Marchesi F, Sarli L, Roncoroni L (2011) Computed tomography volumetric fat parameters versus body mass index for predicting short-term outcomes of colon surgery. World J Surg 35:415–423CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
Haas EM, Aminian A, Nieto J, Pedraza R, Martinez C, Patel CB, Bartley Pickron T (2013) Minimally invasive colorectal surgery in the morbidly obese: does high body mass index lead to poorer outcomes? Surg Curr Res 3:149
31.
Jimenez-Rodriquez RM, Diaz-Pavon JM, de Juan FDLP, Prendes-Sillero E, Dussort HC, Padillo J (2013) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:815–821CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in obese patients: a case-matched series
Authors
Jeffrey N. Harr
Samuel Luka
Aman Kankaria
Yen-Yi Juo
Samir Agarwal
Vincent Obias
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5291-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2017 Go to the issue

Review

The role of stents in the management of colorectal complications: a systematic review

OriginalPaper

The outcomes of initial endoscopic transluminal drainage are superior to percutaneous drainage for patients with infected pancreatic necrosis: a prospective cohort study

Dynamic Manuscript

Development of a novel simulation model for assessment of laparoscopic camera navigation

OriginalPaper

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy by transabdominal lateral approach: 20 years of experience

OriginalPaper

Evaluation of antibiotic pressurized pulse lavage for contaminated retromuscular abdominal wall reconstruction

OriginalPaper

Visceral to subcutaneous fat ratio predicts acuity of diverticulitis