Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 10/2011

01-10-2011 | Reports of Original Investigations

Risk factors associated with maternal satisfaction during childbirth: a retrospective cohort study

Authors: Béatrice Gil-Wey, BSc, Georges L. Savoldelli, MD, Christian Kern, MD, Guy Haller, MD, PhD

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 10/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Factors associated with maternal satisfaction of anesthetic management during labour and delivery are poorly known. The purpose of this study was to assess these factors.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study on parturients admitted between January 2004 and December 2008. Data on patients’ demographics, comorbidities, procedures performed and various aspects of their anesthetic experience were retrieved from the anesthetic records. Maternal satisfaction was measured using a numerical scale from 0 to 10 (0 = not satisfied at all, 10 = very satisfied). A cutoff of ≤ 6 was taken as poor satisfaction. We performed a multivariate analysis to identify the different predictors of maternal satisfaction and more specifically those related to pain, overall experience with the technique, delays, and presence of anesthetic, obstetrical and neonatal complications.

Results

There were 15,386 parturients admitted during the study period. Of these, 10,034 had complete information in the chart and 761 (7.6%) parturients were dissatisfied with their anesthetic care. Factors decreasing patient satisfaction were high risk pregnancy [odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 (0.34-1.02)] and difficult delivery [OR (95% CI) 0.62 (0.52-0.74)]. Pain, a negative experience of the procedure, delays, poor coordination in management, and the presence of complications decreased patient satisfaction [OR (95% CI) 0.07 to 0.71]; P < 0.001.

Conclusion

Maternal satisfaction with anesthesia care is largely determined by the effectiveness and correct performance of the procedure carried from the technical and human point of view. However, other factors such as a good coordination in patient management and the absence of complications also influence maternal satisfaction.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW, Athanasiou T. Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery 2009; 146: 435-43.PubMedCrossRef Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW, Athanasiou T. Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery 2009; 146: 435-43.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Deutsch N, Wu CL. Patient outcomes following ambulatory anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2003; 21: 403-15.PubMedCrossRef Deutsch N, Wu CL. Patient outcomes following ambulatory anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2003; 21: 403-15.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Eagle CJ, Davies JM. Current models of “quality”–an introduction for anaesthetists. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 851-62.PubMedCrossRef Eagle CJ, Davies JM. Current models of “quality”–an introduction for anaesthetists. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 851-62.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Le May S, Hardy JF, Taillefer MC, Dupuis G. Patient satisfaction with anesthesia services. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 153-61.PubMedCrossRef Le May S, Hardy JF, Taillefer MC, Dupuis G. Patient satisfaction with anesthesia services. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 153-61.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ross A. Maternal satisfaction with labour analgesia. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 12: 499-512.PubMedCrossRef Ross A. Maternal satisfaction with labour analgesia. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 12: 499-512.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gredilla E, Perez Ferrer A, Martinez B, Alonso E, Diez J, Gilsanz F. Maternal satisfaction with the quality of epidural analgesia for pain relief in labor (Spanish). Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2008; 55: 160-4.PubMed Gredilla E, Perez Ferrer A, Martinez B, Alonso E, Diez J, Gilsanz F. Maternal satisfaction with the quality of epidural analgesia for pain relief in labor (Spanish). Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2008; 55: 160-4.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kannan S, Jamison RN, Datta S. Maternal satisfaction and pain control in women electing natural childbirth. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001; 26: 468-72.PubMed Kannan S, Jamison RN, Datta S. Maternal satisfaction and pain control in women electing natural childbirth. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001; 26: 468-72.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Morgan PJ, Halpern S, Lam-McCulloch J. Comparison of maternal satisfaction between epidural and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Can J Anesth 2000; 47: 956-61.PubMedCrossRef Morgan PJ, Halpern S, Lam-McCulloch J. Comparison of maternal satisfaction between epidural and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Can J Anesth 2000; 47: 956-61.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Paech MJ. The King Edward Memorial Hospital 1, 000 mother survey of methods of pain relief in labour. Anaesth Intensive Care 1991; 19: 393-9.PubMed Paech MJ. The King Edward Memorial Hospital 1, 000 mother survey of methods of pain relief in labour. Anaesth Intensive Care 1991; 19: 393-9.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Hudak PL, Wright JG. The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 3167-77.CrossRef Hudak PL, Wright JG. The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 3167-77.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Angle P, Landy CK, Charles C, et al. Phase 1 development of an index to measure the quality of neuraxial labour analgesia: exploring the perspectives of childbearing women. Can J Anesth 2010; 57: 468-78.PubMedCrossRef Angle P, Landy CK, Charles C, et al. Phase 1 development of an index to measure the quality of neuraxial labour analgesia: exploring the perspectives of childbearing women. Can J Anesth 2010; 57: 468-78.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Collis RE, Davies DW, Aveling W. Randomised comparison of combined spinal-epidural and standard epidural analgesia in labour. Lancet 1995; 345: 1413-6.PubMedCrossRef Collis RE, Davies DW, Aveling W. Randomised comparison of combined spinal-epidural and standard epidural analgesia in labour. Lancet 1995; 345: 1413-6.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Murphy JD, Henderson K, Bowden MI, Lewis M, Cooper GM. Bupivacaine versus bupivacaine plus fentanyl for epidural analgesia: effect on maternal satisfaction. BMJ 1991; 302: 564-7.PubMedCrossRef Murphy JD, Henderson K, Bowden MI, Lewis M, Cooper GM. Bupivacaine versus bupivacaine plus fentanyl for epidural analgesia: effect on maternal satisfaction. BMJ 1991; 302: 564-7.PubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Climie CR, Cope TI, Stevens LH, et al. Consumer satisfaction in the labour ward. Med J Aust 1973; 2: 1081-4.PubMed Climie CR, Cope TI, Stevens LH, et al. Consumer satisfaction in the labour ward. Med J Aust 1973; 2: 1081-4.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Shields D. Nursing care in labour and patient satisfaction: a descriptive study. J Adv Nurs 1978; 3: 535-50.PubMedCrossRef Shields D. Nursing care in labour and patient satisfaction: a descriptive study. J Adv Nurs 1978; 3: 535-50.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Butani P, Hodnett E. Mothers’ perceptions of their labor experiences. Matern Child Nurs J 1980; 9: 73-82.PubMed Butani P, Hodnett E. Mothers’ perceptions of their labor experiences. Matern Child Nurs J 1980; 9: 73-82.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Fung D, Cohen MM. Measuring patient satisfaction with anesthesia care: a review of current methodology. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 1089-98.PubMed Fung D, Cohen MM. Measuring patient satisfaction with anesthesia care: a review of current methodology. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 1089-98.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Katz D, Foxman B. How well do prediction equations predict? Using receiver operating characteristic curves and accuracy curves to compare validity and generalizability. Epidemiology 1993; 4: 319-26.PubMedCrossRef Katz D, Foxman B. How well do prediction equations predict? Using receiver operating characteristic curves and accuracy curves to compare validity and generalizability. Epidemiology 1993; 4: 319-26.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Brown S, Lumley J. Changing childbirth: lessons from an Australian survey of 1336 women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 143-55.PubMedCrossRef Brown S, Lumley J. Changing childbirth: lessons from an Australian survey of 1336 women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 143-55.PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs 2004; 46: 212-9.PubMedCrossRef Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs 2004; 46: 212-9.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sullivan DA, Beeman R. Satisfaction with maternity care: a matter of communication and choice. Med Care 1982; 20: 321-30.PubMedCrossRef Sullivan DA, Beeman R. Satisfaction with maternity care: a matter of communication and choice. Med Care 1982; 20: 321-30.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hodnett ED. Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S160-72.PubMed Hodnett ED. Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S160-72.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Risk factors associated with maternal satisfaction during childbirth: a retrospective cohort study
Authors
Béatrice Gil-Wey, BSc
Georges L. Savoldelli, MD
Christian Kern, MD
Guy Haller, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-011-9550-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2011

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 10/2011 Go to the issue