Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2017

01-05-2017 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Risk factors and peripartum outcomes of failed epidural: a prospective cohort study

Authors: Carmen Bucstain, Gali Garmi, Noah Zafran, Sivan Zuarez-Easton, Julia Carmeli, Raed Salim

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Awareness to rate, risk factors, and the associated peripartum outcomes of failed epidural analgesia (FEA) may improve expectations and labor management. We aimed to identify risk factors for FEA and to examine peripartum outcomes associated with failure.

Methods

A prospective cohort study conducted between March 2015 and August 2015, at a single university medical center. Laboring women at ≥34 weeks, receiving epidural analgesia, were eligible. Pain was evaluated using a 0–10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). FEA was defined as VAS score ≥5, 30 min after the loading dose. The primary outcome was to identify risk factors for FEA. In addition, second-stage duration and operative vaginal delivery rate were also examined. Univariate logistic regression and stepwise multivariate logistic regression were performed to estimate the predictors for FEA.

Results

Of all 414 women included, 35 (8.5%) had FEA. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression revealed that fetal head station 1 cm above the ischial spines (p = 0.002, adjusted OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.9–16.0), oxytocin use (p = 0.026, adjusted OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1–6.8), and seniority of the anesthesiologist (p = 0.046, adjusted OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.93–0.99) at epidural insertion were found as significant variables associated with FEA. Second-stage duration and operative vaginal delivery rate did not differ significantly between women with failed and successful epidural.

Conclusion

Higher fetal head station and oxytocin use may be associated with higher failure rate. Labor outcomes related to epidural use, occurred at comparable rates, among women with failed and successful epidural.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia (2007) Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology 106:843–863CrossRef American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia (2007) Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology 106:843–863CrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Cruchley PM, Rose K (1994) Supplemental analgesic requirements with continuous epidural infusion: patient profiles. Can J Anaesth 41:A30CrossRef Cruchley PM, Rose K (1994) Supplemental analgesic requirements with continuous epidural infusion: patient profiles. Can J Anaesth 41:A30CrossRef
4.
go back to reference D’Angelo R, Foss ML, Livesay CH (1997) A comparison of multiport and uniport epidural catheters in laboring patients. Anesth Analg 84:1276–1279CrossRefPubMed D’Angelo R, Foss ML, Livesay CH (1997) A comparison of multiport and uniport epidural catheters in laboring patients. Anesth Analg 84:1276–1279CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sivaprakasam J, Purva M (2010) Cusum analysis to assess competence: what failure rate is acceptable? Clin Teach 7:257–261CrossRefPubMed Sivaprakasam J, Purva M (2010) Cusum analysis to assess competence: what failure rate is acceptable? Clin Teach 7:257–261CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pan PH, Bogard TD, Owen MD (2004) Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries. Int J Obstet Anesth 13:227–233CrossRefPubMed Pan PH, Bogard TD, Owen MD (2004) Incidence and characteristics of failures in obstetric neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a retrospective analysis of 19,259 deliveries. Int J Obstet Anesth 13:227–233CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ducrow M (1971) The occurrence of unblocked segments during continuous lumbar epidural analgesia for relief of pain in labour. Br J Anaesth 43:1172–1173CrossRefPubMed Ducrow M (1971) The occurrence of unblocked segments during continuous lumbar epidural analgesia for relief of pain in labour. Br J Anaesth 43:1172–1173CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Michael S, Richmond MN, Birks RJ (1989) A comparison between open-end (single-hole) and closed-end (three lateral holes) epidural catheters. Anaesthesia 44:578–580CrossRefPubMed Michael S, Richmond MN, Birks RJ (1989) A comparison between open-end (single-hole) and closed-end (three lateral holes) epidural catheters. Anaesthesia 44:578–580CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Le Coq G, Ducot B, Benhamou D (1998) Risk factors of inadequate pain relief during epidural analgesia for labour and delivery. Can J Anaesth 45:719–723CrossRefPubMed Le Coq G, Ducot B, Benhamou D (1998) Risk factors of inadequate pain relief during epidural analgesia for labour and delivery. Can J Anaesth 45:719–723CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Debon R, Chassard D, Duflo F, Boselli E, Bryssine B, Allaouchiche B (2002) Chronobiology of epidural ropivacaine: variations in the duration of action related to the hour of administration. Anesthesiolology 96:542–545CrossRef Debon R, Chassard D, Duflo F, Boselli E, Bryssine B, Allaouchiche B (2002) Chronobiology of epidural ropivacaine: variations in the duration of action related to the hour of administration. Anesthesiolology 96:542–545CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Agaram R, Douglas MJ, McTaggart RA, Gunka V (2009) Inadequate pain relief with labor epidurals: a multivariate analysis of associated factors. Int J Obstet Anesth 18:10–14CrossRefPubMed Agaram R, Douglas MJ, McTaggart RA, Gunka V (2009) Inadequate pain relief with labor epidurals: a multivariate analysis of associated factors. Int J Obstet Anesth 18:10–14CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Thangamuthu A, Russell IF, Purva M (2013) Epidural failure rate using a standardised definition. Int J Obstet Anesth 22:310–315CrossRefPubMed Thangamuthu A, Russell IF, Purva M (2013) Epidural failure rate using a standardised definition. Int J Obstet Anesth 22:310–315CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S (2007) Expectant fathers’ experience during labor with or without epidural analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 16:110–115CrossRefPubMed Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S (2007) Expectant fathers’ experience during labor with or without epidural analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 16:110–115CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wiklund I, Norman M, Uvnas-Moberg K, Ransjo-Arvidson AB, Andolf E (2009) Epidural analgesia: breast-feeding success and related factors. Midwifery 25:e31–e38CrossRefPubMed Wiklund I, Norman M, Uvnas-Moberg K, Ransjo-Arvidson AB, Andolf E (2009) Epidural analgesia: breast-feeding success and related factors. Midwifery 25:e31–e38CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Beilin Y, Bodian CA, Weiser J, Hossain S, Arnold I, Feierman DE, Martin G, Holzman I (2005) Effect of labor epidural analgesia with and without fentanyl on infant breastfeeding: a prospective, randomized, double- blind study. Anesthesiology 103:1211–1217CrossRefPubMed Beilin Y, Bodian CA, Weiser J, Hossain S, Arnold I, Feierman DE, Martin G, Holzman I (2005) Effect of labor epidural analgesia with and without fentanyl on infant breastfeeding: a prospective, randomized, double- blind study. Anesthesiology 103:1211–1217CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Volmanen P, Valanne J, Alahuhta S (2004) Breast-feeding problems after epidural analgesia for labour: a retrospective cohort study of pain, obstetrical procedures and breast-feeding practices. Int J Obstet Anesth 13:25–29CrossRefPubMed Volmanen P, Valanne J, Alahuhta S (2004) Breast-feeding problems after epidural analgesia for labour: a retrospective cohort study of pain, obstetrical procedures and breast-feeding practices. Int J Obstet Anesth 13:25–29CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Risk factors and peripartum outcomes of failed epidural: a prospective cohort study
Authors
Carmen Bucstain
Gali Garmi
Noah Zafran
Sivan Zuarez-Easton
Julia Carmeli
Raed Salim
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4337-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2017 Go to the issue

Images in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Vesico-uterine fistula in pregnancy