Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2010

01-07-2010

Risk-Adapted Anastomosis for Partial Pancreaticoduodenectomy Reduces the Risk of Pancreatic Fistula: A Pilot Study

Authors: Marco Niedergethmann, Niloufar Dusch, Rizky Widyaningsih, Christel Weiss, Peter Kienle, Stefan Post

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 7/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pancreatic fistula (PF) is the main cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality after pancreatectomy. Two reasons for PF are a “soft” pancreatic texture and a narrow pancreatic duct (high-risk gland). Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) may lead to a higher fistula rate in such glands. In the literature there are no data available on risk-adapted assignment of pancreatogastrostomy (PG) in a high-risk gland. Therefore, an observational pilot study was conducted to address this issue.

Methods

Since January 2007 the concept of a “risk-adapted pancreatic anastomosis” (RAP) was introduced (PG for high-risk glands). The PF rate, morbidity, and mortality during this period (January 2007 to December 2008, n = 74) were compared to those between January 2004 and December 2006 (n = 119, only PJ). PF was defined according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery.

Results

Through RAP the PF rate was reduced from 22 to 11% (P = 0.0503). Grade C PF rate was reduced from 6.7 to 1.4% (P = 0.1569) and grade A PF from 6 to 1.4% (P = 0.2537). The PF-associated mortality was reduced from 3.4 to 1.4%. PG revealed a PF rate of 7% and PJ accounted for 19% of PFs (P = 0.1765). There was no incidence of grade C PF following PG. The incidence of intraluminal hemorrhage (P = 0.0422) and delayed gastric emptying (P = 0.0572) was higher following PG.

Conclusions

The rate of PF could be significantly reduced with the use of RAP. One should be cautious about the indication for PG, since it is associated with a higher rate of intraluminal hemorrhage and delayed gastric emptying. There are no long-term results on PG with respect to its durability and function. A general recommendation for its use cannot currently be made.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Callery MP, Pratt WB, Vollmer CM (2009) Prevention and management of pancreatic fistula. J Gastrointest Surg 13:163–173CrossRefPubMed Callery MP, Pratt WB, Vollmer CM (2009) Prevention and management of pancreatic fistula. J Gastrointest Surg 13:163–173CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Niedergethmann M, Farag Soliman M, Post S (2004) Postoperative complications of pancreatic cancer surgery. Minerva Chir 59:175–183PubMed Niedergethmann M, Farag Soliman M, Post S (2004) Postoperative complications of pancreatic cancer surgery. Minerva Chir 59:175–183PubMed
3.
go back to reference Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW et al (2003) Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg 27:324–329CrossRefPubMed Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW et al (2003) Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg 27:324–329CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Clavien PA et al (2007) Proposal for definition and severity grading of pancreatic anastomosis failure and pancreatic occlusion failure. Surgery 141:420–426CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Clavien PA et al (2007) Proposal for definition and severity grading of pancreatic anastomosis failure and pancreatic occlusion failure. Surgery 141:420–426CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Reid-Lombardo KM, Farnell MB, Crippa S et al (2007) Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1, 507 patients: a report from the pancreatic anastomotic leak study group. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1451–1458 (discussion 1459)CrossRefPubMed Reid-Lombardo KM, Farnell MB, Crippa S et al (2007) Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1, 507 patients: a report from the pancreatic anastomotic leak study group. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1451–1458 (discussion 1459)CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Shinchi H, Wada K, Traverso LW (2006) The usefulness of drain data to identify a clinically relevant pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy? J Gastrointest Surg 10:490–498CrossRefPubMed Shinchi H, Wada K, Traverso LW (2006) The usefulness of drain data to identify a clinically relevant pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy? J Gastrointest Surg 10:490–498CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Traverso LW (2006) Pancreatic cancer: surgery alone is not sufficient. Surg Endosc 20(Suppl 2):S446–S449CrossRefPubMed Traverso LW (2006) Pancreatic cancer: surgery alone is not sufficient. Surg Endosc 20(Suppl 2):S446–S449CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yang YM, Tian XD, Zhuang Y et al (2005) Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 11:2456–2461PubMed Yang YM, Tian XD, Zhuang Y et al (2005) Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 11:2456–2461PubMed
9.
go back to reference Bartoli FG, Arnone GB, Ravera G et al (1991) Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature. Anticancer Res 11:1831–1848PubMed Bartoli FG, Arnone GB, Ravera G et al (1991) Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature. Anticancer Res 11:1831–1848PubMed
10.
go back to reference Suc B, Msika S, Fingerhut A et al (2003) Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 237:57–65CrossRefPubMed Suc B, Msika S, Fingerhut A et al (2003) Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 237:57–65CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Goldsmith HS, Ghosh BC, Huvos AG (1971) Ligation versus implantation of the pancreatic duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 132:87–92PubMed Goldsmith HS, Ghosh BC, Huvos AG (1971) Ligation versus implantation of the pancreatic duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 132:87–92PubMed
12.
go back to reference Papachristou DN, Fortner JG (1981) Pancreatic fistula complicating pancreatectomy for malignant disease. Br J Surg 68:238–240CrossRefPubMed Papachristou DN, Fortner JG (1981) Pancreatic fistula complicating pancreatectomy for malignant disease. Br J Surg 68:238–240CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Mokadam NA et al (2002) Prospective trial of a blood supply-based technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: effect on anastomotic failure in the Whipple procedure. J Am Coll Surg 194:746–758 (discussion 759-760)CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Mokadam NA et al (2002) Prospective trial of a blood supply-based technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: effect on anastomotic failure in the Whipple procedure. J Am Coll Surg 194:746–758 (discussion 759-760)CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Kim MP et al (2004) Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 8:766–772 (discussion 772-764)CrossRefPubMed Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Kim MP et al (2004) Does fibrin glue sealant decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Gastrointest Surg 8:766–772 (discussion 772-764)CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Murr MM, Nagorney DM (1999) An end-to-end pancreaticojejunostomy using a mechanical purse-string device. Am J Surg 177:340–341CrossRefPubMed Murr MM, Nagorney DM (1999) An end-to-end pancreaticojejunostomy using a mechanical purse-string device. Am J Surg 177:340–341CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Landen S (1998) Consolidation of a friable pancreas for pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. Dig Surg 15:297–298CrossRefPubMed Landen S (1998) Consolidation of a friable pancreas for pancreaticojejunal anastomosis. Dig Surg 15:297–298CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Aranha GV, Aaron JM, Shoup M (2006) Critical analysis of a large series of pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 141:574–579 (discussion 579-580)CrossRefPubMed Aranha GV, Aaron JM, Shoup M (2006) Critical analysis of a large series of pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 141:574–579 (discussion 579-580)CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM et al (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222:580–588 (discussion 588-592)PubMed Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM et al (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222:580–588 (discussion 588-592)PubMed
20.
go back to reference Rosso E, Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E et al (2006) Toward zero pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy. Am J Surg 191:726–732 (discussion 733-724)CrossRefPubMed Rosso E, Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E et al (2006) Toward zero pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy. Am J Surg 191:726–732 (discussion 733-724)CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E et al (2008) Pancreatogastrostomy as a salvage procedure to treat severe postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 143:966–970 (discussion 971)CrossRefPubMed Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E et al (2008) Pancreatogastrostomy as a salvage procedure to treat severe postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 143:966–970 (discussion 971)CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S et al (2005) A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 189:720–729CrossRefPubMed Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S et al (2005) A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 189:720–729CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E et al (2005) Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 242:767–771 (discussion 771-763)CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E et al (2005) Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 242:767–771 (discussion 771-763)CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Muller MW et al (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 193:171–183CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Muller MW et al (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 193:171–183CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Niedergethmann M, Grutzmann R, Hildenbrand R et al (2008) Outcome of invasive and noninvasive intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMN): a 10-year experience. World J Surg 32:2253–2260CrossRefPubMed Niedergethmann M, Grutzmann R, Hildenbrand R et al (2008) Outcome of invasive and noninvasive intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMN): a 10-year experience. World J Surg 32:2253–2260CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Niedergethmann M, Shang E, Farag Soliman M et al (2006) Early and enduring nutritional and functional results of pylorus preservation vs classic Whipple procedure for pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391:195–202CrossRefPubMed Niedergethmann M, Shang E, Farag Soliman M et al (2006) Early and enduring nutritional and functional results of pylorus preservation vs classic Whipple procedure for pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391:195–202CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Dinter DJ, Aramin N, Weiss C et al (2009) Prediction of anastomotic leakage after pancreatic head resections by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI). J Gastrointest Surg 13:735–744CrossRefPubMed Dinter DJ, Aramin N, Weiss C et al (2009) Prediction of anastomotic leakage after pancreatic head resections by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI). J Gastrointest Surg 13:735–744CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Yeo CJ (1995) Management of complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Clin North Am 75:913–924PubMed Yeo CJ (1995) Management of complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Clin North Am 75:913–924PubMed
32.
go back to reference Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F et al (2008) The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:459–471CrossRefPubMed Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F et al (2008) The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:459–471CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Tanaka M (2004) Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: diagnosis and treatment. Pancreas 28:282–288CrossRefPubMed Tanaka M (2004) Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: diagnosis and treatment. Pancreas 28:282–288CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Jang JY, Kim SW, Park SJ et al (2002) Comparison of the functional outcome after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy. World J Surg 26:366–371CrossRefPubMed Jang JY, Kim SW, Park SJ et al (2002) Comparison of the functional outcome after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy. World J Surg 26:366–371CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Rault A, SaCunha A, Klopfenstein D et al (2005) Pancreaticojejunal anastomosis is preferable to pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for long-term outcomes of pancreatic exocrine function. J Am Coll Surg 201:239–244CrossRefPubMed Rault A, SaCunha A, Klopfenstein D et al (2005) Pancreaticojejunal anastomosis is preferable to pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for long-term outcomes of pancreatic exocrine function. J Am Coll Surg 201:239–244CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Lemaire E, O’Toole D, Sauvanet A et al (2000) Functional and morphological changes in the pancreatic remnant following pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastric anastomosis. Br J Surg 87:434–438CrossRefPubMed Lemaire E, O’Toole D, Sauvanet A et al (2000) Functional and morphological changes in the pancreatic remnant following pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastric anastomosis. Br J Surg 87:434–438CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Konishi M, Ryu M, Kinoshita T et al (1999) Pathophysiology after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: a comparative study of pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy. Hepatogastroenterology 46:1181–1186PubMed Konishi M, Ryu M, Kinoshita T et al (1999) Pathophysiology after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: a comparative study of pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy. Hepatogastroenterology 46:1181–1186PubMed
38.
go back to reference Delcore R, Thomas JH, Pierce GE et al (1990) Pancreatogastrostomy: a safe drainage procedure after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 108:641–645 (discussion 645-647)PubMed Delcore R, Thomas JH, Pierce GE et al (1990) Pancreatogastrostomy: a safe drainage procedure after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 108:641–645 (discussion 645-647)PubMed
39.
go back to reference Wellner U, Makowiec F, Fischer E et al (2009) Reduced postoperative pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:745–751CrossRefPubMed Wellner U, Makowiec F, Fischer E et al (2009) Reduced postoperative pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:745–751CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 246:269–280CrossRefPubMed Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 246:269–280CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Aranha GV, Hodul P, Golts E et al (2003) A comparison of pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 7:672–682CrossRefPubMed Aranha GV, Hodul P, Golts E et al (2003) A comparison of pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 7:672–682CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP et al (2009) Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg 208:738–747 (discussion 747-739)CrossRefPubMed Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP et al (2009) Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg 208:738–747 (discussion 747-739)CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Risk-Adapted Anastomosis for Partial Pancreaticoduodenectomy Reduces the Risk of Pancreatic Fistula: A Pilot Study
Authors
Marco Niedergethmann
Niloufar Dusch
Rizky Widyaningsih
Christel Weiss
Peter Kienle
Stefan Post
Publication date
01-07-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 7/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0521-5

Other articles of this Issue 7/2010

World Journal of Surgery 7/2010 Go to the issue