Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Comparative Clinical Pathology 5/2015

01-09-2015 | Editorial

Rhodococcus equi: are phenotypic tests the best method for accurate identification?

Author: Mehdi Fatahi Bafghi

Published in: Comparative Clinical Pathology | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Excerpt

Heidari Sureshjani and colleagues recently reported Isolation of Rhodococcus equi from a mule with cutaneous wound (Sureshjani et al. 2014). In this article, they describe the use of phenotypic testing for identification of species. The genus Rhodococcus is one of the actinomycete families and the name of this genus first used by Zopf. Rhodococcus are Gram-positive, partially acid fast, aerobic, and non-motile bacteria (Bell et al. 1998). Identification of Rhodococcus species using conventional methods is difficult, and the results of these methods are not suitable for accurate identification. There is some published evidence that the identification of Rhodococcus and Gordonia from each other is impossible with phenotypic tests (Blanc et al. 2007). CAMP (Christie-Atkins-Munch-Petersen) test is actually a rapid identification phenotypic marker for R. equi, although this test is also positive in other bacteria such as Rhodococcus erythropolis, Rhodococcus rhodochrous, Dietzia spp., and Mycobacterium spp. (Pd et al. 2012). The use of conventional methods with molecular technique such as polymerase chain reaction (using choE gene) is very important and necessary for accurate identification of R. equi (Pd et al. 2012; Krewer et al. 2008; Ladrón et al. 2003). …
Literature
go back to reference Blanc V, Dalle M, Markarian A, Debunne M, Duplay E, Rodriguez-Nava V et al (2007) Gordonia terrae: a difficult-to-diagnose emerging pathogen? J Clin Microbiol 45(3):1076–1077PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Blanc V, Dalle M, Markarian A, Debunne M, Duplay E, Rodriguez-Nava V et al (2007) Gordonia terrae: a difficult-to-diagnose emerging pathogen? J Clin Microbiol 45(3):1076–1077PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Krewer CC, Spricigo DA, Botton SA, Costa MMD, Schrank I, Vargas ACD (2008) Molecular characterization of Rhodococcus equi isolates of horse breeding farms from an endemic region in south of Brazil by multiplex PCR. Braz J Microbiol 39(1):188–193PubMedCentralCrossRef Krewer CC, Spricigo DA, Botton SA, Costa MMD, Schrank I, Vargas ACD (2008) Molecular characterization of Rhodococcus equi isolates of horse breeding farms from an endemic region in south of Brazil by multiplex PCR. Braz J Microbiol 39(1):188–193PubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Ladrón N, Fernández M, Agüero J, Zörn BG, Vázquez-Boland JA, Navas J (2003) Rapid identification of Rhodococcus equi by a PCR assay targeting the choE gene. J Clin Microbiol 41(7):3241–3245PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ladrón N, Fernández M, Agüero J, Zörn BG, Vázquez-Boland JA, Navas J (2003) Rapid identification of Rhodococcus equi by a PCR assay targeting the choE gene. J Clin Microbiol 41(7):3241–3245PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Silva P, Santos ACB, Sato DN, Silva JO, Medeiros MIC, Carneiro AMM et al (2012) Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Rhodococcus equi isolated from sputum. Braz J Infect Dis 16(5):409–415CrossRefPubMed Silva P, Santos ACB, Sato DN, Silva JO, Medeiros MIC, Carneiro AMM et al (2012) Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Rhodococcus equi isolated from sputum. Braz J Infect Dis 16(5):409–415CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sureshjani MH, Atyabi N, Tazikeh A, Falahatipour SK, Hashemian M (2014) Isolation of Rhodococcus equi from a mule with cutaneous wound. Comp Clin Pathol 24(3):691–693CrossRef Sureshjani MH, Atyabi N, Tazikeh A, Falahatipour SK, Hashemian M (2014) Isolation of Rhodococcus equi from a mule with cutaneous wound. Comp Clin Pathol 24(3):691–693CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rhodococcus equi: are phenotypic tests the best method for accurate identification?
Author
Mehdi Fatahi Bafghi
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Comparative Clinical Pathology / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 1618-5641
Electronic ISSN: 1618-565X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-015-2171-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Comparative Clinical Pathology 5/2015 Go to the issue