Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Rhinoplasty | Rhinology

Functional and aesthetic results after septorhinoplasty and concomitant radiofrequency of the inferior turbinate: is there a role for patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)?

Authors: Claudio Parrilla, Antonio Salvati, Rodolfo Francesco Mastrapasqua, Alberto Artuso, Gaetano Paludetti, Jacopo Galli

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Functional and aesthetic results after septorhinoplasty (SRP) are often not clearly demonstrated. There is still an open topic in the literature about analysis of aesthetic, functional results and patients’ satisfaction after SRP. The aim of our study is to determine patients’ satisfaction after SRP and concomitant radiofrequency of the inferior turbinate (RF) regarding nose appearance and improvement of symptoms, using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods

ROE questionnaire and the NOSE scale were used for a retrospective evaluation to assess patient’s satisfaction in 369 patients undergoing SRP surgery from 2003 to 2016. Two additional questions were asked to confirm satisfaction following surgery.

Results

258 patients completed the questionnaires (71.7%). The global average ROE score was 18.14 (75.6%). The percentage of satisfaction of aesthetic result was 87.3%, in particular 10.5% were very happy, 57% very much satisfied and 19.8% moderately satisfied. The global post-operative average NOSE score was 13.1 with the resolution of nasal obstruction in 72.1% cases and a marked improvement in 9.3%. The results of the two additional questions showed that 81% of patients would undergo the procedure again if required and 72.1% of patients were globally satisfied.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates the utility of PROMs in evaluating aesthetic and functional results after SRP and simultaneous RF. In our series, the patients undergoing SRP and RF are generally satisfied by the functional and aesthetic results. This kind of assessments should be the most common post-operative evaluation methods in this surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Meyer L, Jacobsson S (1986) The predictive validity of psychosocial factors for patient acceptance of rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 17:513–520CrossRefPubMed Meyer L, Jacobsson S (1986) The predictive validity of psychosocial factors for patient acceptance of rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 17:513–520CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Andre´ RF, Vuyk HD, Ahmed A, Graamans K, Nolst Trenite´ GJ (2009) Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence. Clin Otolaryngol 34:518–525CrossRefPubMed Andre´ RF, Vuyk HD, Ahmed A, Graamans K, Nolst Trenite´ GJ (2009) Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence. Clin Otolaryngol 34:518–525CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jones AS, Willatt DJ, Durham LM (1989) Nasal airflow: resistance and sensation. J Laryngol Otol 103:909–911CrossRefPubMed Jones AS, Willatt DJ, Durham LM (1989) Nasal airflow: resistance and sensation. J Laryngol Otol 103:909–911CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kim CS, Moon BK, Jung DH, Min YG (1998) Correlation between nasal obstruction symptoms and objective parameters of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Auris Nasus Larynx 25:45–48CrossRefPubMed Kim CS, Moon BK, Jung DH, Min YG (1998) Correlation between nasal obstruction symptoms and objective parameters of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Auris Nasus Larynx 25:45–48CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Andrews PJ, Choudhury N, Takhar A, Poirrier AL, Jacques T, Randhawa PS (2015) The need for an objective measure in septorhinoplasty surgery: are we any closer to finding an answer? Clin Otolaryngol 40:698–703CrossRefPubMed Andrews PJ, Choudhury N, Takhar A, Poirrier AL, Jacques T, Randhawa PS (2015) The need for an objective measure in septorhinoplasty surgery: are we any closer to finding an answer? Clin Otolaryngol 40:698–703CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Alsarraf R (2000) Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions. Aesthet Plast Surg 24:192–197CrossRef Alsarraf R (2000) Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions. Aesthet Plast Surg 24:192–197CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF, Anderson S, Murakami CS, Johnson CM (2001) Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:198–201CrossRefPubMed Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF, Anderson S, Murakami CS, Johnson CM (2001) Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 3:198–201CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT (2004) Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(2):157–163CrossRefPubMed Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT (2004) Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(2):157–163CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(4):1807–1811CrossRefPubMed Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(4):1807–1811CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Izu SC, Kosugi EM, Brandao KV, Lopes AS, Garcia LB, Suguri VM, Gregorio LC (2012) Normal values for the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 78:76–79CrossRefPubMed Izu SC, Kosugi EM, Brandao KV, Lopes AS, Garcia LB, Suguri VM, Gregorio LC (2012) Normal values for the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 78:76–79CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Biggs TC, Fraser LR, Ward MJ, Sunkaraneni VS, Harries PG, Salib RJ (2015) Patient reported outcome measures in septorhinoplasty surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97(1):63–65CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Biggs TC, Fraser LR, Ward MJ, Sunkaraneni VS, Harries PG, Salib RJ (2015) Patient reported outcome measures in septorhinoplasty surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97(1):63–65CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Katz S, Schmelzer B, Vidts G (2000) Treatment of the obstructive nose by CO2-laser reduction of the inferior turbinates: technique and results. Am J Rhinol 14:51–55CrossRefPubMed Katz S, Schmelzer B, Vidts G (2000) Treatment of the obstructive nose by CO2-laser reduction of the inferior turbinates: technique and results. Am J Rhinol 14:51–55CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pirila T, Tikanto J (2001) Unilateral and bilateral effects of nasal septum surgery demonstrated with acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and subjective assessment. Am J Rhinol 15:127–133CrossRefPubMed Pirila T, Tikanto J (2001) Unilateral and bilateral effects of nasal septum surgery demonstrated with acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and subjective assessment. Am J Rhinol 15:127–133CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Passali D, Lauriello M, Anselmi M, Bellussi L (1999) Treatment of hypertrophy of the inferior turbinate: long-term results in 382 patients randomly assigned to therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108:569–575CrossRefPubMed Passali D, Lauriello M, Anselmi M, Bellussi L (1999) Treatment of hypertrophy of the inferior turbinate: long-term results in 382 patients randomly assigned to therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108:569–575CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Jessen M, Malm L (1984) The importance of nasal airway resistance and nasal symptoms in the selection of patients for septoplasty. Rhinology 22:157–164PubMed Jessen M, Malm L (1984) The importance of nasal airway resistance and nasal symptoms in the selection of patients for septoplasty. Rhinology 22:157–164PubMed
16.
go back to reference Carney AS, Bateman ND, Jones NS (2000) Reliable and reproducible anterior active rhinomanometry for the assessment of unilateral nasal resistance. Clin Otolaryngol 25:499–503CrossRefPubMed Carney AS, Bateman ND, Jones NS (2000) Reliable and reproducible anterior active rhinomanometry for the assessment of unilateral nasal resistance. Clin Otolaryngol 25:499–503CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Radulesco T, Penicaud M, Santini L, Thomassin JM, Dessi P, Michel J (2017) Outcomes of septorhinoplasty: a new approach comparing functional and aesthetic results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47(2):175–179CrossRefPubMed Radulesco T, Penicaud M, Santini L, Thomassin JM, Dessi P, Michel J (2017) Outcomes of septorhinoplasty: a new approach comparing functional and aesthetic results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47(2):175–179CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sipila J, Suonpaa J, Silvoniemi P, Laippala P (1995) Correlation between subjective sensation of nasal patency and rhinomanometry in both unilateral and total nasal assessment. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 57(5):260–263CrossRefPubMed Sipila J, Suonpaa J, Silvoniemi P, Laippala P (1995) Correlation between subjective sensation of nasal patency and rhinomanometry in both unilateral and total nasal assessment. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 57(5):260–263CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Bermuller C, Kirsche H, Rettinger G, Riechelmann H (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of peak nasal inspiratory flow and rhinomanometry in functional rhinosurgery. Laryngoscope 118(4):605–610CrossRefPubMed Bermuller C, Kirsche H, Rettinger G, Riechelmann H (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of peak nasal inspiratory flow and rhinomanometry in functional rhinosurgery. Laryngoscope 118(4):605–610CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Starling-Schwanz R, Peake HL, Salome CM et al (2005) Repeatability of peak nasal inspiratory flow measurements and utility for assessing the severity of rhinitis. Allergy 60:795–800CrossRefPubMed Starling-Schwanz R, Peake HL, Salome CM et al (2005) Repeatability of peak nasal inspiratory flow measurements and utility for assessing the severity of rhinitis. Allergy 60:795–800CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Clement PAR, Gordts F (2005) Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Rhinology 43:169–179PubMed Clement PAR, Gordts F (2005) Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Rhinology 43:169–179PubMed
23.
go back to reference Hassan SJ, Weymuller EA (1993) Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck 15:485–496CrossRefPubMed Hassan SJ, Weymuller EA (1993) Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck 15:485–496CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Deleyiannis FW, Weymuller EA, Coltrera MD, Futran N (1999) Quality of life after laryngectomy: are functional disabilities important? Head Neck 21:319–324CrossRefPubMed Deleyiannis FW, Weymuller EA, Coltrera MD, Futran N (1999) Quality of life after laryngectomy: are functional disabilities important? Head Neck 21:319–324CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Rosenfeld RM (1995) Pilot study of outcomes in pediatric rhinosinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:729–736+CrossRefPubMed Rosenfeld RM (1995) Pilot study of outcomes in pediatric rhinosinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:729–736+CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Sinno S, Mehta K, Lee ZH, Kidwai S, Saadeh PB, Lee MR (2016) Inferior turbinate hypertrophy in rhinoplasty: systematic review of surgical techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 138(3):419e–419e29eCrossRefPubMed Sinno S, Mehta K, Lee ZH, Kidwai S, Saadeh PB, Lee MR (2016) Inferior turbinate hypertrophy in rhinoplasty: systematic review of surgical techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 138(3):419e–419e29eCrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Parrilla C, Artuso A, Gallus R, Galli J, Paludetti G (2013) The role of septal surgery in cosmetic rhinoplasty. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 33(3):146–153PubMedPubMedCentral Parrilla C, Artuso A, Gallus R, Galli J, Paludetti G (2013) The role of septal surgery in cosmetic rhinoplasty. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 33(3):146–153PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Saleh AM, Younes A, Friedman O (2012) Cosmetics and function: quality-of-life changes after rhinoplasty surgery. Laryngoscope 122:254–259CrossRefPubMed Saleh AM, Younes A, Friedman O (2012) Cosmetics and function: quality-of-life changes after rhinoplasty surgery. Laryngoscope 122:254–259CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Başer E, Kocagöz GD, Çalim ÖF, Verim A, Yilmaz F, Özturan O (2016) Assessment of patient satisfaction with evaluation methods in open technique septorhinoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 27(2):420–424CrossRefPubMed Başer E, Kocagöz GD, Çalim ÖF, Verim A, Yilmaz F, Özturan O (2016) Assessment of patient satisfaction with evaluation methods in open technique septorhinoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 27(2):420–424CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Functional and aesthetic results after septorhinoplasty and concomitant radiofrequency of the inferior turbinate: is there a role for patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)?
Authors
Claudio Parrilla
Antonio Salvati
Rodolfo Francesco Mastrapasqua
Alberto Artuso
Gaetano Paludetti
Jacopo Galli
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-05269-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 3/2019 Go to the issue