Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Religion and Health 2/2020

01-04-2020 | Rhinoplasty | Original Paper

The Effect of Religious Beliefs on the Attitude of Aesthetic Surgery Operation in Islam

Authors: Ümran Muslu, Emre Demir

Published in: Journal of Religion and Health | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationship between individuals’ attitudes about acceptance of aesthetic surgery (e.g. rhinoplasty, autoplasty, blepharoplasty, and mammaplasty) and some of the worship practices in Islamic religion such as performing prayer, fasting, and going to pilgrimage. Although many people think that aesthetic surgery is inappropriate in Islamic religion, no studies in the literature were found to have investigated this issue. This study collected data through a questionnaire administered to 96 patients who applied to our Plastic Surgery Clinic and underwent various surgical operations and 96 patients who were recommended plastic surgery but rejected to have one; the questionnaire aimed to identify the participants’ frequency of religious worship practices and appropriateness of aesthetic surgery to their beliefs. The participants responded on the frequency of religious worship levels according to the options in the questionnaire. The “Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale” was utilized in order to identify their attitudes towards aesthetic surgery. Levels of performing prayers, fasting, and going to pilgrimage in the groups that accepted surgery and in the groups that rejected surgery were significantly different (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, p < 0.001). In two different groups, the Acceptance of Aesthetic Surgery Scale scores were significantly different within the prayer groups and fasting groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p < 0.001). While the group that accepted surgery indicated no significant differences between those who thought about going to pilgrimage and who did not (p = 0.650), there was a significant difference in the group that rejected surgery (p < 0.001). While 14.6% of the participants in the group that accepted surgery considered aesthetic surgery a sin, this proportion was 56.3% in the group that rejected surgery, and this difference was significant (p < 0.001). In both surgery groups, there were differences in the scale scores of those who considered aesthetic surgery a sin and those who did not (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). There was a significant relationship between worship practices, one of the biggest indicators of the level of belief in Islamic religion, and aesthetic surgery attitudes. However, despite the fact that belief levels affect the decision of having an operation in plastic surgery, in case of serious health problems, the decision of having an operation becomes more important religious beliefs.
Literature
go back to reference Adamson, P. A., & Litner, J. A. (2007). Otoplasty technique. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America,40, 305–318.CrossRef Adamson, P. A., & Litner, J. A. (2007). Otoplasty technique. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America,40, 305–318.CrossRef
go back to reference Atiyeh, B. S., Kadry, M., Hayek, S. N., & Musharafieh, R. S. (2008). Aesthetic surgery and religion: Islamic law perspective. Aesth Plast Surg,32, 1–10.CrossRef Atiyeh, B. S., Kadry, M., Hayek, S. N., & Musharafieh, R. S. (2008). Aesthetic surgery and religion: Islamic law perspective. Aesth Plast Surg,32, 1–10.CrossRef
go back to reference Bakhshaee, M., Asghari, M., Sharifian, M. R., Ashtiyani, S. J., & Rasoulian, B. (2018). Islamic attitudes and rhinoplasty. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology,30(2), 91–96.PubMedPubMedCentral Bakhshaee, M., Asghari, M., Sharifian, M. R., Ashtiyani, S. J., & Rasoulian, B. (2018). Islamic attitudes and rhinoplasty. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology,30(2), 91–96.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Coştu, Yakup. (2009). Approach to religion by the normative and popular: “A test on the religious orientation scale”. Journal of Divinity Faculty of Hitit University,8(15), 119–139. Coştu, Yakup. (2009). Approach to religion by the normative and popular: “A test on the religious orientation scale”. Journal of Divinity Faculty of Hitit University,8(15), 119–139.
go back to reference Damiano, R. F., Costa, L. A., Viana, M. T. S. A., Moreira-Almeida, A., Lucchetti, A. L. G., & Lucchetti, G. (2016). Brazilian scientific articles on “Spirituality, Religion and Health”. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo),43(1), 11–16.CrossRef Damiano, R. F., Costa, L. A., Viana, M. T. S. A., Moreira-Almeida, A., Lucchetti, A. L. G., & Lucchetti, G. (2016). Brazilian scientific articles on “Spirituality, Religion and Health”. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo),43(1), 11–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Ellison, C. G., & Levin, J. S. (1998). The religion-health connection: Evidence, theory, and future directions. Health Education & Behavior,25, 700–720.CrossRef Ellison, C. G., & Levin, J. S. (1998). The religion-health connection: Evidence, theory, and future directions. Health Education & Behavior,25, 700–720.CrossRef
go back to reference Fromm, Erich. (1976). To have or to be?. New York: Harper & Row. Fromm, Erich. (1976). To have or to be?. New York: Harper & Row.
go back to reference Henderson-King, D., & Henderson-King, E. (2005). Acceptances of cosmetic surgery: Scale development and validation. Body Image,2, 137–149.CrossRef Henderson-King, D., & Henderson-King, E. (2005). Acceptances of cosmetic surgery: Scale development and validation. Body Image,2, 137–149.CrossRef
go back to reference Karaca, S., Karakoç, A., Onan, N., & Kadıoğlu, H. (2017). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale (ACSS). Journal of Psychiatric Nursing,8(1), 17–22. Karaca, S., Karakoç, A., Onan, N., & Kadıoğlu, H. (2017). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Acceptance of Cosmetic Surgery Scale (ACSS). Journal of Psychiatric Nursing,8(1), 17–22.
go back to reference Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Handbook of religion and health. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Handbook of religion and health. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Lucchetti, G., & Lucchetti, A. L. (2014). Spirituality, religion, and health: Over the last 15 years of field research (1999–2013). The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine,48(3), 199–215.CrossRef Lucchetti, G., & Lucchetti, A. L. (2014). Spirituality, religion, and health: Over the last 15 years of field research (1999–2013). The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine,48(3), 199–215.CrossRef
go back to reference Muslu, Ü. (2018). The evolution of breast reduction publications: A bibliometric analysis. Aesth Plast Surg.,42(3), 679–691.CrossRef Muslu, Ü. (2018). The evolution of breast reduction publications: A bibliometric analysis. Aesth Plast Surg.,42(3), 679–691.CrossRef
go back to reference Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New York: Guilford. Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New York: Guilford.
go back to reference Sloan, R. P., Bagiella, E., & Powell, T. (1999). Religion, spirituality, and medicine. Lancet,353, 664–667.CrossRef Sloan, R. P., Bagiella, E., & Powell, T. (1999). Religion, spirituality, and medicine. Lancet,353, 664–667.CrossRef
go back to reference Sönmez, A. Ö. (2016). The religiosity scales developed on the measurability of religiosity. SEFAD,36, 557–578.CrossRef Sönmez, A. Ö. (2016). The religiosity scales developed on the measurability of religiosity. SEFAD,36, 557–578.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Effect of Religious Beliefs on the Attitude of Aesthetic Surgery Operation in Islam
Authors
Ümran Muslu
Emre Demir
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00767-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Journal of Religion and Health 2/2020 Go to the issue