Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2013

01-09-2013 | Rhinology

Rhinoplasty planning with an iPhone app: analysis of otolaryngologists response

Authors: Francesc Larrosa, Maria J. Dura, Josep Roura, Anabella Hernandez

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 9/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The field of medical applications is currently one of the most dynamic in medicine due to the great potential for improving clinical practice they hold. However, clinicians’ opinion around their usability in daily clinical care has not been thoroughly addressed. This study aimed to analyze the otolaryngologists response to a rhinoplasty application. It was designed as a survey of 21 otolaryngologists with regards to a rhinoplasty planning application for the iPhone with the capacity to project potential surgery outcomes through tactile morphing software compared to a photo tracing method used as the gold standard. The participants were asked to rate the usefulness of the two technologies on a visual analog scale from 0–10. Questions addressed included four topics: physician–patient communication; imaging process time; perceived usefulness for preoperative planning; and perceived usefulness for surgery. A one sample t-test was applied to compare the scores of both methods for each question. The test subjects (mean age 43.21 years) rated the utility of the iPhone application as superior to that of the photo tracing method (p < 0.05) concluding that the iPhone application could facilitate an immediate preliminary analysis of the options for nasal improvement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pope L, Silva P, Almeyda R (2010) i-Phone applications for the modern day otolaryngologist. Clin Otolaryngol 35:350–354PubMedCrossRef Pope L, Silva P, Almeyda R (2010) i-Phone applications for the modern day otolaryngologist. Clin Otolaryngol 35:350–354PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Amin K (2011) Smartphone applications for the plastic surgery trainee. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:1255–1257PubMedCrossRef Amin K (2011) Smartphone applications for the plastic surgery trainee. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:1255–1257PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Franko OI, Tirrell TF (2012) Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. J Med Syst 36:3135–3139PubMedCrossRef Franko OI, Tirrell TF (2012) Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. J Med Syst 36:3135–3139PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Buijink AW, Visser BJ, Marshall L (2012) Medical apps for smartphones: lack of evidence undermines quality and safety. Evid Based Med [Epub ahead of print] Buijink AW, Visser BJ, Marshall L (2012) Medical apps for smartphones: lack of evidence undermines quality and safety. Evid Based Med [Epub ahead of print]
6.
go back to reference Palma P, Khodaei I, Tasman AJ (2011) A guide to the assessment and analysis of the rhinoplasty patient. Facial Plast Surg 27:146–159PubMedCrossRef Palma P, Khodaei I, Tasman AJ (2011) A guide to the assessment and analysis of the rhinoplasty patient. Facial Plast Surg 27:146–159PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pedroza F (2002) A 20-year review of the “new domes” technique for refining the drooping nasal tip. Arch Facial Plast Surg 4:157–163PubMedCrossRef Pedroza F (2002) A 20-year review of the “new domes” technique for refining the drooping nasal tip. Arch Facial Plast Surg 4:157–163PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sevin A, Sevin K, Erdogan B, Adanali G, Deren O (2006) A useful method for planning hump resection of deviated nose. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30:433–436PubMedCrossRef Sevin A, Sevin K, Erdogan B, Adanali G, Deren O (2006) A useful method for planning hump resection of deviated nose. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30:433–436PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mühlbauer W, Holm C (2005) Computer imaging and surgical reality in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:2098–2104PubMedCrossRef Mühlbauer W, Holm C (2005) Computer imaging and surgical reality in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:2098–2104PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ewart CJ, Leonard CJ, Harper JG, Yu J (2006) A simple and inexpensive method of preoperative computer imaging for rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 56:46–49PubMedCrossRef Ewart CJ, Leonard CJ, Harper JG, Yu J (2006) A simple and inexpensive method of preoperative computer imaging for rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 56:46–49PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Adelson RT, DeFatta RJ, Bassischis BA (2008) Objective assessment of the accuracy of computer-simulated imaging in rhinoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol 29:151–155 Adelson RT, DeFatta RJ, Bassischis BA (2008) Objective assessment of the accuracy of computer-simulated imaging in rhinoplasty. Am J Otolaryngol 29:151–155
12.
go back to reference Moscatiello F (2010) Herrero Jover J, González Ballester MA, Carreño Hernández E, Piombino P, Califano L. Preoperative digital three-dimensional planning for rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:232–238PubMedCrossRef Moscatiello F (2010) Herrero Jover J, González Ballester MA, Carreño Hernández E, Piombino P, Califano L. Preoperative digital three-dimensional planning for rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:232–238PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Toriumi DM, Dixon TK (2011) Assessment of rhinoplasty techniques by overlay of before-and-after 3D images. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 19:711–723PubMedCrossRef Toriumi DM, Dixon TK (2011) Assessment of rhinoplasty techniques by overlay of before-and-after 3D images. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 19:711–723PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hamilton GS 3rd (2010) Morphing images to demonstrate potential surgical outcomes. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 18:267–282PubMedCrossRef Hamilton GS 3rd (2010) Morphing images to demonstrate potential surgical outcomes. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 18:267–282PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Henderson JL, Larrabee WF Jr, Krieger BD (2005) Photographic standards for facial plastic surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7:331–333PubMedCrossRef Henderson JL, Larrabee WF Jr, Krieger BD (2005) Photographic standards for facial plastic surgery. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7:331–333PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wall S, Kazahaya K, Becker SS, Becker DG (1999) Thirty-five millimetre versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation. Facial Plast Surg 15:101–109PubMedCrossRef Wall S, Kazahaya K, Becker SS, Becker DG (1999) Thirty-five millimetre versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation. Facial Plast Surg 15:101–109PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Galdino GM, DaSilva AD, Gunter JP (2002) Digital photography for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1421–1434PubMedCrossRef Galdino GM, DaSilva AD, Gunter JP (2002) Digital photography for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1421–1434PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Archibald DJ, Carlson ML, Friedman O (2010) Pitfalls of nonstandardized photography. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 18:253–266PubMedCrossRef Archibald DJ, Carlson ML, Friedman O (2010) Pitfalls of nonstandardized photography. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 18:253–266PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Riml S, Piontke A, Larcher L, Kompatscher P (2011) Quantification of faults resulting from disregard of standardised facial photography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:898–901PubMedCrossRef Riml S, Piontke A, Larcher L, Kompatscher P (2011) Quantification of faults resulting from disregard of standardised facial photography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:898–901PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Aitken RC (1969) Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med 62:989–993PubMed Aitken RC (1969) Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med 62:989–993PubMed
21.
go back to reference Gerich J (2007) Visual analogue scales for mode-independent measurement in self-administered questionnaires. Behav Res Methods 39:985–992PubMedCrossRef Gerich J (2007) Visual analogue scales for mode-independent measurement in self-administered questionnaires. Behav Res Methods 39:985–992PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Thomas JR, Freeman MS, Remmler DJ, Ehlert TK (1989) Analysis of patient response to preoperative computerized video imaging. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115:793–796PubMedCrossRef Thomas JR, Freeman MS, Remmler DJ, Ehlert TK (1989) Analysis of patient response to preoperative computerized video imaging. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115:793–796PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Rhinoplasty planning with an iPhone app: analysis of otolaryngologists response
Authors
Francesc Larrosa
Maria J. Dura
Josep Roura
Anabella Hernandez
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2360-0

Other articles of this Issue 9/2013

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2013 Go to the issue