Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 12/2014

01-12-2014 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Revision rates and cumulative financial burden in patients treated with hemiarthroplasty compared to cannulated screws after femoral neck fractures

Authors: Edward Shields, Stephen L. Kates

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

This study compares re-operation rates and financial burden following the treatment of femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty compared to non-displaced femoral neck fractures treated with cannulated screws.

Methods

Data was retrospectively analyzed from a prospective database at a university hospital setting on patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fractures and those with non-displaced femoral neck fractures treated with cannulated screws over a 7-year period. Re-operation rates were determined and financial data was analyzed. Charges refer to amounts billed by the hospital to insurance carriers, while costs refer to financial burden carried by the hospital during treatment.

Results

There were 491 femoral neck fractures (475 patients) that underwent hemiarthroplasty (HA) and 120 non-displaced fractures (119 patients) treated with cannulated screw (CannS) fixation. Both groups had similar age, sex, Charlson co-morbidity scores, pre-operative Parker mobility scores, and 12-month mortality. There were 29 (5.9 %) reoperations in the HA group and 16 (13.3 %) in the CannS group (P = 0.007). The majority of re-operations occurred within 12 months for both groups [21/29 (72 %) HA group; 15/16 (94 %) CannS group; P = 0.13]. Average hospital charges per patient for the index procedure were higher in the HA group ($17,880 ± 745) compared to the CannS group ($14,104 ± 5,047; P < 0.001). After accounting for additional procedures related to their initial surgical fixation, average hospital charges and costs remained higher in the HA group.

Conclusion

Patients treated with hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures have lower re-operation rates than patients treated with cannulated screws for non-displaced femoral neck fractures, with 80 % of re-operations occurring in the first 12 months. Hospital charges and costs to the hospital for treating patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty were higher than patients treated with cannulated screws for the index procedure alone, and after accounting for re-operations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brown CA, Starr AZ, Nunley JA (2012) Analysis of past secular trends of hip fractures and predicted number in the future 2010–2050. J Orthop Trauma 26:117–122PubMedCrossRef Brown CA, Starr AZ, Nunley JA (2012) Analysis of past secular trends of hip fractures and predicted number in the future 2010–2050. J Orthop Trauma 26:117–122PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference US Interim Projections by Age, Sex, Race and HO. Washington (DC): US Census Bureau, Population Division, Populations Projection Branch 2010–2050 nd US Interim Projections by Age, Sex, Race and HO. Washington (DC): US Census Bureau, Population Division, Populations Projection Branch 2010–2050 nd
3.
go back to reference Barrett M, Whalen D (2007) HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample Comparison Report. HCUP Methods Series Report# 2010-03 nd Barrett M, Whalen D (2007) HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample Comparison Report. HCUP Methods Series Report# 2010-03 nd
4.
go back to reference Schnell S, Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Bingham KW, Kates SL (2010) The 1-year mortality of patients treated in a hip fracture program for elders. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 1:6–14PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schnell S, Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Bingham KW, Kates SL (2010) The 1-year mortality of patients treated in a hip fracture program for elders. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 1:6–14PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bentley G (1980) Treatment of nondisplaced fractures of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop Relat Res 152:93–101PubMed Bentley G (1980) Treatment of nondisplaced fractures of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop Relat Res 152:93–101PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hansen F (1994) Conservative vs. surgical treatment of impacted, subcapital fractures of the femoral neck. Acta Orthop Scand 256:9 Hansen F (1994) Conservative vs. surgical treatment of impacted, subcapital fractures of the femoral neck. Acta Orthop Scand 256:9
7.
go back to reference Masson M, Parker MJ, Fleischer S (2003) Internal fixation vs. arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD001708 Masson M, Parker MJ, Fleischer S (2003) Internal fixation vs. arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD001708
8.
go back to reference Rödén M, Schön M, Fredin H (2003) Treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomized minimum 5-year follow-up study of screws and bipolar hemiprostheses in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 74:42–44PubMedCrossRef Rödén M, Schön M, Fredin H (2003) Treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomized minimum 5-year follow-up study of screws and bipolar hemiprostheses in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 74:42–44PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Parker MJ, Khan RJK, Crawford J, Pryor GA (2002) Hemiarthroplasty vs. internal fixation for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly. A randomised trial of 455 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:1150–1155PubMedCrossRef Parker MJ, Khan RJK, Crawford J, Pryor GA (2002) Hemiarthroplasty vs. internal fixation for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly. A randomised trial of 455 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:1150–1155PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Parker MJ, Pryor GA (2000) Internal fixation or arthroplasty for displaced cervical hip fractures in the elderly: a randomised controlled trial of 208 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 71:440–446PubMedCrossRef Parker MJ, Pryor GA (2000) Internal fixation or arthroplasty for displaced cervical hip fractures in the elderly: a randomised controlled trial of 208 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 71:440–446PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.
13.
go back to reference Goodman D, Fisher E, Chang C (2011) After Hospitalization: a Dartmouth Atlas report on post-acute care for Medicare beneficiaries. Hanover, NH Dartmouth Goodman D, Fisher E, Chang C (2011) After Hospitalization: a Dartmouth Atlas report on post-acute care for Medicare beneficiaries. Hanover, NH Dartmouth
15.
go back to reference Buecking B, Eschbach D, Koutras C, Kratz T, Balzer-Geldsetzer M, Dodel R et al (2013) Re-admission to level 2 unit after hip-fracture surgery: risk factors, reasons and outcome. Injury 44:1919–1925PubMedCrossRef Buecking B, Eschbach D, Koutras C, Kratz T, Balzer-Geldsetzer M, Dodel R et al (2013) Re-admission to level 2 unit after hip-fracture surgery: risk factors, reasons and outcome. Injury 44:1919–1925PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Boockvar KS, Halm EA, Litke A, Silberzweig SB, McLaughlin M, Penrod JD et al (2003) Hospital readmissions after hospital discharge for hip fracture: surgical and nonsurgical causes and effect on outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:399–403PubMedCrossRef Boockvar KS, Halm EA, Litke A, Silberzweig SB, McLaughlin M, Penrod JD et al (2003) Hospital readmissions after hospital discharge for hip fracture: surgical and nonsurgical causes and effect on outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:399–403PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kates SL, Blake D, Bingham KW, Kates OS, Mendelson DA, Friedman SM (2010) Comparison of an organized geriatric fracture program to US government data. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 1:15–21PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kates SL, Blake D, Bingham KW, Kates OS, Mendelson DA, Friedman SM (2010) Comparison of an organized geriatric fracture program to US government data. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 1:15–21PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Revision rates and cumulative financial burden in patients treated with hemiarthroplasty compared to cannulated screws after femoral neck fractures
Authors
Edward Shields
Stephen L. Kates
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2096-3

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 12/2014 Go to the issue