Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Original Article • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY

Revision knee arthroplasty using a distal femoral replacement prosthesis for periprosthetic fractures in elderly patients

Authors: Ehab Girgis, Christoph McAllen, Jonathan Keenan

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Distal femoral periprosthetic fractures above a total knee replacement in elderly patients are technically challenging to treat. Bone quality is often poor, the fractures comminuted, and post-operative mobilisation is difficult. This study assesses the clinical, radiological and functional outcome of revision knee distal femoral replacement (DFR) in these fractures.

Methods

We identified 14 patients over 70 years of age (70–94) who underwent DFR for periprosthetic fractures above a knee replacement. All the 14 fractures were classified as Su type III. Clinical and radiological records were retrospectively reviewed. The mean of clinical follow-up was 27 months (8–46). Functional outcome was assessed using Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5D (UK English Version) score at a mean time of 35 months (20–65). The Knee Society patient category score was also evaluated.

Results

The median post-operative knee flexion was 100° (range 90°–135°). Nine patients (64%) returned to their pre-fracture level of mobility or better. The median post-operative Oxford Knee Score was 27 (range 4–40). The median EQ-5D was 11 (range 6–12). Cognitive impairment negatively impacted the functional outcome in four patients. One patient died early post-operatively, and two patients had complications.

Conclusions

DFR led to satisfactory outcome in our patients with a relatively low complication rate. In our experience, revision knee distal femoral replacement is an appropriate method to treat elderly patients who sustained periprosthetic Su et al. type III distal femoral fractures in association with poor bone stock, caused by osteoporosis and/or comminution.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Chen F, Mont MA, Bachner RS (1994) Management of ipsilateral supracondylar femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 9:521–526CrossRefPubMed Chen F, Mont MA, Bachner RS (1994) Management of ipsilateral supracondylar femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 9:521–526CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Su ET, DeWal H, Di Cesare PE (2004) Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:12–20CrossRefPubMed Su ET, DeWal H, Di Cesare PE (2004) Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:12–20CrossRefPubMed
6.
9.
go back to reference Saidi K, Ben-Lulu O, Tsuji M, Safir O, Gross AE, Backstein D (2014) Supracondylar periprosthetic fractures of the knee in the elderly patients: a comparison of treatment using allograft-implant composites, standard revision component, distal femoral replacement prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 29:110–114. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.012 CrossRefPubMed Saidi K, Ben-Lulu O, Tsuji M, Safir O, Gross AE, Backstein D (2014) Supracondylar periprosthetic fractures of the knee in the elderly patients: a comparison of treatment using allograft-implant composites, standard revision component, distal femoral replacement prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 29:110–114. doi:10.​1016/​j.​arth.​2013.​04.​012 CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Keenan J, Chakrabarty G, Newman JH (2000) Treatment of supracondylar femoral fracture above total knee replacement by custom made hinged prosthesis. Knee 7:165–170CrossRefPubMed Keenan J, Chakrabarty G, Newman JH (2000) Treatment of supracondylar femoral fracture above total knee replacement by custom made hinged prosthesis. Knee 7:165–170CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Streubel PN, Gardner MJ, Morshed S, Collinge CA, Gallagher B, Ricci WM (2010) Are extreme distal periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur too distal to fix using a lateral locked plate? J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:527–534. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.22996 CrossRefPubMed Streubel PN, Gardner MJ, Morshed S, Collinge CA, Gallagher B, Ricci WM (2010) Are extreme distal periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur too distal to fix using a lateral locked plate? J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:527–534. doi:10.​1302/​0301-620X.​92B3.​22996 CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kim W, Song JH, Kim JJ (2015) Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur following total knee arthroplasty: even very distal fractures can be successfully treated using internal fixation. Int Orthop 39:1951–1957. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2970-9 CrossRefPubMed Kim W, Song JH, Kim JJ (2015) Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur following total knee arthroplasty: even very distal fractures can be successfully treated using internal fixation. Int Orthop 39:1951–1957. doi:10.​1007/​s00264-015-2970-9 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jacofsky DJ, Della Valle CJ, Meneghini RM, Sporer SM, Cercek RM (2010) Revision total knee arthroplasty: what the practicing orthopaedic surgeon needs to know. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1282–1892PubMed Jacofsky DJ, Della Valle CJ, Meneghini RM, Sporer SM, Cercek RM (2010) Revision total knee arthroplasty: what the practicing orthopaedic surgeon needs to know. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1282–1892PubMed
17.
18.
19.
go back to reference Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14 Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14
Metadata
Title
Revision knee arthroplasty using a distal femoral replacement prosthesis for periprosthetic fractures in elderly patients
Authors
Ehab Girgis
Christoph McAllen
Jonathan Keenan
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-2009-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2018 Go to the issue