Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2019

01-01-2019 | Original Article • KNEE - SPORT

Revision ACL reconstruction with autograft: long-term functional outcomes and influencing factors

Authors: Connor Boyle, Ravikanth Pagoti, Khemerin Hun Eng, Samuel E. McMahon, Richard Nicholas

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To present the long-term functional outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with autograft and factors that influence the outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective study of 51 consecutive revision ACL reconstructions performed using autograft under the care of a single surgeon with interference screw fixation. Bone-patellar tendon-bone graft was used in 35 (69%) and hamstring tendons in 16 (31%). The subjective IKDC activity level and Lysholm Knee functional scores were collected at mean follow-up of 9.0 years (range 5.17–14.75 years).

Results

Five (9.8%) had re-ruptured and one patient had a total knee replacement. Functional scores were available for 43 patients (84.3%). Twenty-eight had IKDC activity level I or II (65%), level III in 12 (28%) and level IV in 3 (7%). The average Lysholm score was 86.2 ± 12.88, and there is a statistically significant relationship with age (95% CI: − 0.88, − 0.60) (P < 0.05). For each additional 10 years of age, there is a reduction of 5.18 points. No statistically significant effect of sex has been detected. The mean Lysholm score was lower in patients who had partial medial meniscectomy (77.33), although this was not statistically significant (P = 0.06). Regression analysis of the Lysholm score means by chondral damage category adjusted for age, showed that the Grade 3 or 4 group shows a reduction of about 25 points for every 10 years increase in age (95% CI; P = 0.05).

Conclusion

Revision ACL reconstruction with autograft affords satisfactory long-term outcomes. Expectations should be carefully managed in patients with increasing age associated with severe chondral damage and previous medial meniscectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S et al (2009) Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91(10):2321–2328CrossRef Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S et al (2009) Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91(10):2321–2328CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen AB (2009) The first results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry: epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5818 knee ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:117–124CrossRefPubMed Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen AB (2009) The first results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry: epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5818 knee ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:117–124CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wright RW, Dunn WR, Amendola A et al (2007) Anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction: two-year results from the MOON cohort. J Knee Surg 20:308–311CrossRefPubMed Wright RW, Dunn WR, Amendola A et al (2007) Anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction: two-year results from the MOON cohort. J Knee Surg 20:308–311CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (2001) Revision anterior cruciate surgery with use of bone-patellar tendon-bone autogenous grafts. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83:1131–1143CrossRef Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (2001) Revision anterior cruciate surgery with use of bone-patellar tendon-bone autogenous grafts. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83:1131–1143CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cameron ML, Briggs KK, Steadman JR (2003) Reproducibility and reliability of the outerbridge classification for grading chondral lesions of the knee arthroscopically. Am J Sports Med 31(1):83–86CrossRefPubMed Cameron ML, Briggs KK, Steadman JR (2003) Reproducibility and reliability of the outerbridge classification for grading chondral lesions of the knee arthroscopically. Am J Sports Med 31(1):83–86CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y et al (2009) The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med 37(5):890–897CrossRefPubMed Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y et al (2009) The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med 37(5):890–897CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Southam BR, Colosimo AJ, Grawe B (2018) Underappreciated factors to consider in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—a current concepts review. Orthop J Sports Med 6(1):2325967117751689CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Southam BR, Colosimo AJ, Grawe B (2018) Underappreciated factors to consider in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—a current concepts review. Orthop J Sports Med 6(1):2325967117751689CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Andriolo L, Filardo G, Kon E et al (2015) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(10):2825–2845CrossRefPubMed Andriolo L, Filardo G, Kon E et al (2015) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(10):2825–2845CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wright RW, Gill CS, Chen L et al (2012) Outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94(6):531–536CrossRef Wright RW, Gill CS, Chen L et al (2012) Outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94(6):531–536CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jiang C, Chen G, Chen P et al (2018) Double-bundle revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is effective in rescuing failed primary reconstruction and re-introduction patients to physical exercise. Exp Ther Med 15(2):2074–2080PubMed Jiang C, Chen G, Chen P et al (2018) Double-bundle revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is effective in rescuing failed primary reconstruction and re-introduction patients to physical exercise. Exp Ther Med 15(2):2074–2080PubMed
14.
go back to reference MARS Group (2016) Meniscal and articular cartilage predictors of clinical outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44(7):1671–1679CrossRefPubMedCentral MARS Group (2016) Meniscal and articular cartilage predictors of clinical outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44(7):1671–1679CrossRefPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Webster KE, Feller JA, Kimp A et al (2018) Medial meniscal and chondral pathology at the time of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in inferior mid-term patient-reported outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(4):1059–1064CrossRefPubMed Webster KE, Feller JA, Kimp A et al (2018) Medial meniscal and chondral pathology at the time of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in inferior mid-term patient-reported outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(4):1059–1064CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference MOON Knee Group (2018) Ten-year outcomes and risk factors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a MOON longitudinal prospective cohort study. Am J Sports Med 46(4):815–825CrossRefPubMedCentral MOON Knee Group (2018) Ten-year outcomes and risk factors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a MOON longitudinal prospective cohort study. Am J Sports Med 46(4):815–825CrossRefPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Anand BS, Feller JA, Richmond AK et al (2015) Return-to-sport outcomes after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 44(3):580–584CrossRefPubMed Anand BS, Feller JA, Richmond AK et al (2015) Return-to-sport outcomes after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 44(3):580–584CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Blyth MJG, Gosal HS, Peake WM et al (2003) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over the age of 50 years: 2- to 8-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 11(4):204–211CrossRef Blyth MJG, Gosal HS, Peake WM et al (2003) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over the age of 50 years: 2- to 8-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 11(4):204–211CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Borchers JR, Kaeding CC, Pedroza AD et al (2011) Intra-articular findings in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a comparison of the MOON and MARS study groups. Am J Sports Med 39(9):1889–1893CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Borchers JR, Kaeding CC, Pedroza AD et al (2011) Intra-articular findings in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a comparison of the MOON and MARS study groups. Am J Sports Med 39(9):1889–1893CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Brophy RH, Wright RW, David TS et al (2012) Association between previous meniscal surgery and the incidence of chondral lesions at revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 40(4):808–814CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brophy RH, Wright RW, David TS et al (2012) Association between previous meniscal surgery and the incidence of chondral lesions at revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 40(4):808–814CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Emrani PS, Katz JN, Kessler CL, Reichmann WM et al (2008) Joint space narrowing and Kellgren–Lawrence progression in knee osteoarthritis: an analytic literature synthesis. Osteoarthr Cartil 16(8):873–882CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Emrani PS, Katz JN, Kessler CL, Reichmann WM et al (2008) Joint space narrowing and Kellgren–Lawrence progression in knee osteoarthritis: an analytic literature synthesis. Osteoarthr Cartil 16(8):873–882CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Ajuied A, Wong F, Smith C et al (2013) Anterior cruciate ligament injury and radiologic progression of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 42(9):2242–2252CrossRefPubMed Ajuied A, Wong F, Smith C et al (2013) Anterior cruciate ligament injury and radiologic progression of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 42(9):2242–2252CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Anderson MJ, Browning WM, Urband CE et al (2016) A systematic summary of systematic reviews on the topic of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop J Sports Med 4(3):2325967116634074CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Anderson MJ, Browning WM, Urband CE et al (2016) A systematic summary of systematic reviews on the topic of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop J Sports Med 4(3):2325967116634074CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Grassi A, Nitri M, Moulton SG et al (2017) Does the type of graft affect the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis of 32 studies. Bone Jt J 99-B:714–723CrossRef Grassi A, Nitri M, Moulton SG et al (2017) Does the type of graft affect the outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis of 32 studies. Bone Jt J 99-B:714–723CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Revision ACL reconstruction with autograft: long-term functional outcomes and influencing factors
Authors
Connor Boyle
Ravikanth Pagoti
Khemerin Hun Eng
Samuel E. McMahon
Richard Nicholas
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2277-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2019 Go to the issue