Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine 1/2011

01-08-2011 | Original Article

Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-Review Journals: A Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers

Authors: Travis I. Lovejoy, M.S., M.P.H., Tracey A. Revenson, Ph.D., Christopher R. France, Ph.D.

Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The importance of peer review in the furthering of science cannot be overstated. However, most doctoral students and early career professionals receive little formal or informal training in conducting peer reviews.

Purpose

In recognition of this deficit in peer reviewer training, the present article was developed to provide an overview of the peer-review process at Annals of Behavioral Medicine and describe the general and specific elements that should be included in a high-quality review for the journal.

Conclusion

We conclude by offering exemplar reviews of a manuscript that was ultimately accepted for publication in the journal and provide commentary on specific aspects of these reviews.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Suls J, Martin R. The air we breathe: A critical look at practices and alternatives in the peer-review process. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009, 4:40–50.CrossRef
2.
Cooper ML. Problems, pitfalls, and promise of the peer-review process: Commentary on Trafimow & Rice (2009). Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009; 4: 84–90.CrossRef
3.
4.
Diener E. Being a good reviewer. Dialogue. 2006; 21: 23.
5.
Drotar D. Editorial: How to write effective reviews for the Journal of Pediatric Psychology. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009; 34: 113–117.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Frieze IH. Doing an excellent review of a Sex Roles paper. Sex Roles. 2010; 62: 293.CrossRef
7.
Moher D, Jadad AR. How to peer review a manuscript. In: Godlee F, Jefferson T, eds. Peer review in the health sciences. London: BMJ Books; 2003: 183–190.
8.
Tesser A, Martin L. Reviewing empirical submissions to journals. In: Sternberg RJ, ed. Reviewing scientific works in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2005: 3–29.
9.
Fiske DW, Fogg L. But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper! Diversity and uniqueness in reviewer comments. Am Psychol. 1990; 45: 591–598.CrossRef
10.
Epstein S. What can be done to improve the journal review process? Am Psychol. 1995; 50: 883–885.CrossRef
11.
Lewin K. Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1951.
12.
Bogart LM, Wagner GJ, Galvan FH, Klein DJ. Longitudinal relationships between antiretroviral treatment adherence and discrimination due to HIV-serostatus, race, and sexual orientation among African-American men with HIV. Ann Behav Med. 2010; 40: 184–190.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-Review Journals: A Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers
Authors
Travis I. Lovejoy, M.S., M.P.H.
Tracey A. Revenson, Ph.D.
Christopher R. France, Ph.D.
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Electronic ISSN: 1532-4796
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9269-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Annals of Behavioral Medicine 1/2011 Go to the issue

Original Article

Dimensions of Perceived Racism and Self-Reported Health: Examination of Racial/Ethnic Differences and Potential Mediators

Original Article

Sexual HIV Transmission and Antiretroviral Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study of Behavioral Risk Factors Among Men and Women Living with HIV/AIDS

Original Article

The Conjoined Effect of Naturalistic Perceived Available Support and Enacted Support on Cardiovascular Reactivity During a Laboratory Stressor

Original Article

Patterns of Motivation and Ongoing Exercise Activity in Cardiac Rehabilitation Settings: A 24-Month Exploration from the TEACH Study

Rapid Communication

Determinants of Physical Activity Among People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Test of Social Cognitive Theory

Original Article

Children with Diabetes Compared to Peers: Depressed? Distressed?