Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 11/2017

Open Access 01-11-2017 | Original Scientific Report

Retrospective Study of the Correlation Between Pathological Tumor Size and Survival After Curative Resection of T3 Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Proposal for Reclassification of the Tumor Extending Beyond the Pancreas Based on Tumor Size

Authors: Masanao Kurata, Goro Honda, Yoshiaki Murakami, Kenichiro Uemura, Sohei Satoi, Fuyuhiko Motoi, Masayuki Sho, Ippei Matsumoto, Manabu Kawai, Hiroaki Yanagimoto, Takumi Fukumoto, Minako Nagai, Masahiko Gosho, Michiaki Unno, Hiroki Yamaue, for the Multicenter Study Group of Pancreatobiliary Surgery (MSG-PBS)

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Even though most patients who undergo resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma have T3 disease with extra-pancreatic tumor extension, T3 disease is not currently classified by tumor size. The aim of this study was to modify the current TNM classification of pancreatic adenocarcinoma to reflect the influence of tumor size.

Methods

A total of 847 consecutive pancreatectomy patients were recruited from multiple centers. Optimum tumor size cutoff values were calculated by receiver operating characteristics analysis for tumors limited to the pancreas (T1/2) and for T3 tumors. In our modified TNM classification, stage II was divided into stages IIA (T3aN0M0), IIB (T3bN0M0), and IIC (T1-3bN1M0) using tumor size cutoff values. The usefulness of the new classification was compared with that of the current classification using Akaike’s information criterion (AIC).

Results

The optimum tumor size cutoff value distinguishing T1 and T2 was 2 cm, while T3 was divided into T3a and T3b at a tumor size of 3 cm. The median survival time of the stages IIA, IIB, and IIC were 44.7, 27.6, and 20.3 months, respectively. There were significant differences of survival between stages IIA and IIB (P = 0.02) and between stages IIB and IIC (P = 0.03). The new classification showed better performance compared with the current classification based on the AIC value.

Conclusions

This proposed new TNM classification reflects the influence of tumor size in patients with extra-pancreatic tumor extension (T3 disease), and the classification is useful for predicting mortality.
Literature
1.
3.
4.
go back to reference Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sano T et al (2006) Prognostic factors after distal pancreatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for invasive pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail. Surgery 139:288–295CrossRefPubMed Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sano T et al (2006) Prognostic factors after distal pancreatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for invasive pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail. Surgery 139:288–295CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Franko J, Hugec V, Lopes TL et al (2013) Survival among pancreaticoduodenectomy patients treated for pancreatic head cancer < 1 or 2 cm. Ann Surg Oncol 20:357–361CrossRefPubMed Franko J, Hugec V, Lopes TL et al (2013) Survival among pancreaticoduodenectomy patients treated for pancreatic head cancer < 1 or 2 cm. Ann Surg Oncol 20:357–361CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nitecki SS, Sarr MG, Colby TV et al (1996) Long term survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: is it really improving? Ann Surg 221:59–66CrossRef Nitecki SS, Sarr MG, Colby TV et al (1996) Long term survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: is it really improving? Ann Surg 221:59–66CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fortner JG, Klimstra DS, Seine RT et al (1996) Tumor size is the primary prognosticator for pancreatic cancer after regional pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 223:147–153CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fortner JG, Klimstra DS, Seine RT et al (1996) Tumor size is the primary prognosticator for pancreatic cancer after regional pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 223:147–153CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Benassai G, Mastrorilli M, Quarto G et al (2000) Factors influencing survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. J Surg Oncol 73:212–218CrossRefPubMed Benassai G, Mastrorilli M, Quarto G et al (2000) Factors influencing survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. J Surg Oncol 73:212–218CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lim EL, Chien MW, Earle CC (2003) Prognostic factors following curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma a population-based, linked database analysis of 396 patients. Ann Surg 237:74–85CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lim EL, Chien MW, Earle CC (2003) Prognostic factors following curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma a population-based, linked database analysis of 396 patients. Ann Surg 237:74–85CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Moon HJ, An JY, Heo JS et al (2006) Predicting survival after surgical resection for pancreatic ductal carcinoma. Pancreas 32:37–43CrossRefPubMed Moon HJ, An JY, Heo JS et al (2006) Predicting survival after surgical resection for pancreatic ductal carcinoma. Pancreas 32:37–43CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Geer RJ, Brennan MF (1993) Prognostic indicators for survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 165:68–72CrossRefPubMed Geer RJ, Brennan MF (1993) Prognostic indicators for survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 165:68–72CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Meyer W, Jurowich C, Reichel M et al (2000) Pathological and histological prognostic factors in curatively resected ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Surg Today 30:582–587CrossRefPubMed Meyer W, Jurowich C, Reichel M et al (2000) Pathological and histological prognostic factors in curatively resected ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Surg Today 30:582–587CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199–1210CrossRefPubMed Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199–1210CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Wittekind CH (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Wiley, New York Sobin LH, Wittekind CH (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Wiley, New York
15.
go back to reference Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al (eds) (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al (eds) (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York
18.
go back to reference Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723CrossRef Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U et al (2011) Pancreatic cancer surgery in the new millennium: better prediction of outcome. Ann Surg 254:311–319CrossRefPubMed Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U et al (2011) Pancreatic cancer surgery in the new millennium: better prediction of outcome. Ann Surg 254:311–319CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Boeck S, Stieber P, Holdenrieder S et al (2006) Prognostic and therapeutic significance of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as tumor marker in patients with pancreatic cancer. Oncology 70:255–264CrossRefPubMed Boeck S, Stieber P, Holdenrieder S et al (2006) Prognostic and therapeutic significance of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as tumor marker in patients with pancreatic cancer. Oncology 70:255–264CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Takahashi S, Kinoshita T, Konishi M et al (2011) Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: rationale for multidisciplinary treatment. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:567–574CrossRefPubMed Takahashi S, Kinoshita T, Konishi M et al (2011) Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: rationale for multidisciplinary treatment. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:567–574CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference De Rosa A, Cameron IC, Gomez D (2016) Indications for staging laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer. HPB 18:13–20CrossRefPubMed De Rosa A, Cameron IC, Gomez D (2016) Indications for staging laparoscopy in pancreatic cancer. HPB 18:13–20CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Retrospective Study of the Correlation Between Pathological Tumor Size and Survival After Curative Resection of T3 Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Proposal for Reclassification of the Tumor Extending Beyond the Pancreas Based on Tumor Size
Authors
Masanao Kurata
Goro Honda
Yoshiaki Murakami
Kenichiro Uemura
Sohei Satoi
Fuyuhiko Motoi
Masayuki Sho
Ippei Matsumoto
Manabu Kawai
Hiroaki Yanagimoto
Takumi Fukumoto
Minako Nagai
Masahiko Gosho
Michiaki Unno
Hiroki Yamaue
for the Multicenter Study Group of Pancreatobiliary Surgery (MSG-PBS)
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4077-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

World Journal of Surgery 11/2017 Go to the issue