Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 4/2012

01-08-2012 | Original article

Retrospective investigation of gingival invaginations

Part I: Clinical findings and presentation of a coding system

Authors: Dr. C. Reichert, L. Gölz, C. Dirk, A. Jäger

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Many orthodontic treatments involve tooth extraction. Gingival invagination is a common side effect after orthodontic extraction space closure leading to compromised oral hygiene and the space closure being hampered. Even the long-term stability of the orthodontic treatment result may be jeopardized. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of gingival invagination and possible implications on oral health and orthodontic treatment results.
A total of 30 patients presenting 101 tooth extractions and subsequent orthodontic space closure were investigated to detect the presence of gingival invagination. The time required until active space closure, the thoroughness of space closure, and probing depths mesial and distal to the extraction site in addition to age, gender and the Periodontal Screening Index were investigated. A new coding system to describe the extent of gingival invagination is introduced for the first time here.
Gingival invagination developed more frequently in the lower jaw (50%) than the upper (30%). Complete penetration occurred in the upper jaw in 6% of the patients and in the lower jaw in 25%. All patients without gingival invagination revealed complete space closure, whereas only 70% in the group with gingival invagination did so. The time until initiation of space closure took significantly longer in patients with gingival invagination (7.5 ± 1.4 months) than in patients without (3.3 ± 0.8 months). Probing depths of the adjacent teeth were significantly greater in regions with invaginations.
Thus, the time required until space closure was initiated and the extraction site are important risk factors for the development of gingival invagination. The consequences of gingival invagination are instable space closure and deeper probing depths mesial and distal to the extractions. However, no statements concerning the mid- to long-term effects on oral health can be made.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Araujo MG, Lindhe J (2005) Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32:212–218PubMedCrossRef Araujo MG, Lindhe J (2005) Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32:212–218PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Hayacibara R et al (2005) Healing of extraction sockets and surgically produced – augmented and non-augmented – defects in the alveolar ridge. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32:435–440PubMedCrossRef Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Hayacibara R et al (2005) Healing of extraction sockets and surgically produced – augmented and non-augmented – defects in the alveolar ridge. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32:435–440PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J (2003) Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 30:809–818PubMedCrossRef Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J (2003) Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 30:809–818PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Diedrich P, Wehrbein H (1997) Orthodontic retraction into recent and healed extraction sites. A histologic study. J Orofac Orthop 58:90–99PubMed Diedrich P, Wehrbein H (1997) Orthodontic retraction into recent and healed extraction sites. A histologic study. J Orofac Orthop 58:90–99PubMed
6.
go back to reference Gölz L, Reichert C, Jäger A (2011) Gingival invagination – a systematic review. J Orofac Orthop 72:409–420PubMedCrossRef Gölz L, Reichert C, Jäger A (2011) Gingival invagination – a systematic review. J Orofac Orthop 72:409–420PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kurol J, Rönnerman A, Heyden G (1982) Long-term gingival conditions after orthodontic closure of extraction sites. Histological and histochemical studies. Eur J Orthod 4:87–92PubMed Kurol J, Rönnerman A, Heyden G (1982) Long-term gingival conditions after orthodontic closure of extraction sites. Histological and histochemical studies. Eur J Orthod 4:87–92PubMed
8.
go back to reference Malkoc S, Buyukyilmaz T, Gelgor I, Gursel M (2004) Comparison of two different gingivectomy techniques for gingival cleft treatment. Angle Orthod 74:375–380PubMed Malkoc S, Buyukyilmaz T, Gelgor I, Gursel M (2004) Comparison of two different gingivectomy techniques for gingival cleft treatment. Angle Orthod 74:375–380PubMed
9.
go back to reference Meyle J, Jepsen S (2000) Der parodontale Screening-Index (PSI). Parodontologie 1:17–21 Meyle J, Jepsen S (2000) Der parodontale Screening-Index (PSI). Parodontologie 1:17–21
10.
go back to reference Parker GR (1972) Transseptal fibers and relapse following bodily retraction of teeth: a histologic study. Am J Orthod 61:331–344PubMedCrossRef Parker GR (1972) Transseptal fibers and relapse following bodily retraction of teeth: a histologic study. Am J Orthod 61:331–344PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pinheiro ML, Moreira TC, Feres-Filho EJ (2006) Guided bone regeneration of a pronounced gingivo-alveolar cleft due to orthodontic space closure. J Periodontol 77:1091–1095PubMedCrossRef Pinheiro ML, Moreira TC, Feres-Filho EJ (2006) Guided bone regeneration of a pronounced gingivo-alveolar cleft due to orthodontic space closure. J Periodontol 77:1091–1095PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM (2007) Orthodontic treatment planning: limitations, controversies, and special problems. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM (eds) Contemporary orthodontics. Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis, MO, USA Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM (2007) Orthodontic treatment planning: limitations, controversies, and special problems. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM (eds) Contemporary orthodontics. Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis, MO, USA
13.
go back to reference Reed BE, Polson AM, Subtelny JD (1985) Long-term periodontal status of teeth moved into extraction sites. Am J Orthod 88:203–208PubMedCrossRef Reed BE, Polson AM, Subtelny JD (1985) Long-term periodontal status of teeth moved into extraction sites. Am J Orthod 88:203–208PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Reichert C, Wenghoefer M, Götz W, Jäger A (2011) Pilot study on orthodontic space closure after guided bone regeneration. J Orofac Orthoped 72:45–50CrossRef Reichert C, Wenghoefer M, Götz W, Jäger A (2011) Pilot study on orthodontic space closure after guided bone regeneration. J Orofac Orthoped 72:45–50CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rivera Circuns AL, Tulloch JF (1983) Gingival invagination in extraction sites of orthodontic patients: their incidence, effects on periodontal health, and orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 83:469–476CrossRef Rivera Circuns AL, Tulloch JF (1983) Gingival invagination in extraction sites of orthodontic patients: their incidence, effects on periodontal health, and orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 83:469–476CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Robertson PB, Schultz LD, Levy BM (1977) Occurrence and distribution of interdental gingival clefts following orthodontic movement into bicuspid extraction sites. J Periodontol 48:232–235PubMed Robertson PB, Schultz LD, Levy BM (1977) Occurrence and distribution of interdental gingival clefts following orthodontic movement into bicuspid extraction sites. J Periodontol 48:232–235PubMed
17.
go back to reference Tiefengraber J, Diedrich P, Fritz U, Lantos P (2002) Orthodontic space closure in combination with membrane supported healing of extraction sockets (MHE) a pilot study. J Orofac Orthop 63:422–428PubMedCrossRef Tiefengraber J, Diedrich P, Fritz U, Lantos P (2002) Orthodontic space closure in combination with membrane supported healing of extraction sockets (MHE) a pilot study. J Orofac Orthop 63:422–428PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wehrbein H, Fuhrmann R, Andreas A, Diedrich P (1993) Die Bedeutung von Gingivaduplikaturen beim orthodontischen Lückenschluß. Eine klinisch-radiologische Studie. Fortschr Kieferorthop 54:231–236PubMedCrossRef Wehrbein H, Fuhrmann R, Andreas A, Diedrich P (1993) Die Bedeutung von Gingivaduplikaturen beim orthodontischen Lückenschluß. Eine klinisch-radiologische Studie. Fortschr Kieferorthop 54:231–236PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Retrospective investigation of gingival invaginations
Part I: Clinical findings and presentation of a coding system
Authors
Dr. C. Reichert
L. Gölz
C. Dirk
A. Jäger
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-012-0082-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 4/2012 Go to the issue

Letter to the editor

Letter to the editor

Informationen

DGKFO-Seiten