Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2014

01-11-2014 | Gynecologic Oncology

Retrospective comparative study of irinotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for platinum-resistant or -refractory epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma

Authors: Ryoko Ichikawa, Yutaka Torii, Shuko Oe, Kyoko Kawamura, Rina Kato, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Yasuhiro Udagawa

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study was conducted to retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of irinotecan (CPT-11) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with platinum-resistant or -refractory recurrent epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Methods

Nineteen patients who received CPT-11 and eleven patients who received PLD were enrolled. CPT-11 was intravenously administered at a starting dose of 60–100 mg/m2 on day 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days, and PLD was administered at a starting dose of 40–50 mg/m2 on day 1 every 28 days. Primary outcomes were overall response rate (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]), disease control rate (CR + PR + stable disease), and progression-free survival (PFS) in each group. Clinical response was evaluated every two or three cycles using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria; CA125 analysis was not performed.

Results

The overall response rate was 21.1 % (PR, four cases) and 0 % (p = 0.10) in the CPT-11 and PLD groups, respectively, and the disease control rate was 73.7 and 45.5 % (p = 0.12), respectively. Median PFS was 25.3 (range 5.4–69.9) weeks and 12.7 (range 4.0–43.1) weeks in the CPT-11 and PLD groups, respectively; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.064). Major adverse events in the CPT-11 group were neutropenia, nausea, and diarrhea, whereas those in the PLD group included thrombocytopenia, anemia, stomatitis, and hand-foot syndrome.

Conclusions

This retrospective study demonstrated comparable efficacy outcomes for CPT-11 and PLD. The overall response rate, disease control rate, and median PFS were more favorable in the CPT-11 group compared to the PLD group, although the difference was not significant. The adverse event profiles were different between groups. These results suggest that CPT-11 might be a feasible choice as single-agent salvage chemotherapy for platinum-resistant or -refractory recurrent epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma beside established regimen like PLD.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Markman M, Webster K, Zanotti K et al (2004) Survival following the documentation of platinum and taxane resistance in ovarian cancer: a single institution experience involving multiple phase 2 clinical trials. Gynecol Oncol 93:699–701PubMedCrossRef Markman M, Webster K, Zanotti K et al (2004) Survival following the documentation of platinum and taxane resistance in ovarian cancer: a single institution experience involving multiple phase 2 clinical trials. Gynecol Oncol 93:699–701PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gordon AN, Fleagle JT, Guthrie D et al (2001) Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan. J Clin Oncol 19:3312–3322PubMed Gordon AN, Fleagle JT, Guthrie D et al (2001) Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan. J Clin Oncol 19:3312–3322PubMed
3.
go back to reference Gordon AN, Tonda M, Sun S, Rackoff W (2004) Long-term survival advantage for women treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared with topotecan in a phase 3 randomized study of recurrent and refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 95:1–8PubMedCrossRef Gordon AN, Tonda M, Sun S, Rackoff W (2004) Long-term survival advantage for women treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared with topotecan in a phase 3 randomized study of recurrent and refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 95:1–8PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bodurka DC, Levenback C, Wolf JK et al (2003) Phase II trial of irinotecan with metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer or peritoneal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:291–297PubMedCrossRef Bodurka DC, Levenback C, Wolf JK et al (2003) Phase II trial of irinotecan with metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer or peritoneal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:291–297PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Takakura S, Takano M, Takahashi F et al (2010) Randomized phase II trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin therapy versus irinotecan plus cisplatin therapy as first-line chemotherapy for clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary: a JGOG study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:240–247PubMedCrossRef Takakura S, Takano M, Takahashi F et al (2010) Randomized phase II trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin therapy versus irinotecan plus cisplatin therapy as first-line chemotherapy for clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary: a JGOG study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:240–247PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ushijima K, Kamura T, Tamura K et al (2013) Docetaxel/irinotecan combination chemotherapy in platinum/taxane-refractory and-resistant ovarian cancer: JGOG/WJGOG Intergroup Study. Int J Clin Oncol 18(1):126–131PubMedCrossRef Ushijima K, Kamura T, Tamura K et al (2013) Docetaxel/irinotecan combination chemotherapy in platinum/taxane-refractory and-resistant ovarian cancer: JGOG/WJGOG Intergroup Study. Int J Clin Oncol 18(1):126–131PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shoji T, Takatori E, Omi H et al (2011) Phase II clinical study of the combination chemotherapy regimen of irinotecan plus oral etoposide for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit 101 Group Study). Int J Gynecol Oncol 21:44–50CrossRef Shoji T, Takatori E, Omi H et al (2011) Phase II clinical study of the combination chemotherapy regimen of irinotecan plus oral etoposide for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit 101 Group Study). Int J Gynecol Oncol 21:44–50CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Matsumoto K, Katsumata N, Yamanaka Y et al (2006) The safety and efficacy of the weekly dosing of irinotecan for platinum- and taxanes-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 100:412–416PubMedCrossRef Matsumoto K, Katsumata N, Yamanaka Y et al (2006) The safety and efficacy of the weekly dosing of irinotecan for platinum- and taxanes-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 100:412–416PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nomura H, Tsuda H, Kataoka F et al (2012) Retrospective study comparing irinotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in treatment of recurrent platinum-refractory/resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 33:86–89PubMed Nomura H, Tsuda H, Kataoka F et al (2012) Retrospective study comparing irinotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in treatment of recurrent platinum-refractory/resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 33:86–89PubMed
10.
go back to reference Mutch DG, Orlando M, Goss T et al (2007) Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine compared with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:2811–2818PubMedCrossRef Mutch DG, Orlando M, Goss T et al (2007) Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine compared with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:2811–2818PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rose PG, Maxson JH, Fusco N et al (2001) Liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study of single-agent dosages. Gynecol Oncol 82:323–328PubMedCrossRef Rose PG, Maxson JH, Fusco N et al (2001) Liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study of single-agent dosages. Gynecol Oncol 82:323–328PubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Cesano A, Lane SR, Poulin R, Ross G, Fields SZ (1999) Stabilization of disease as a useful predictor of survival following second-line chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer and ovarian cancer patients. Int J Oncol 15:1233–1238PubMed Cesano A, Lane SR, Poulin R, Ross G, Fields SZ (1999) Stabilization of disease as a useful predictor of survival following second-line chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer and ovarian cancer patients. Int J Oncol 15:1233–1238PubMed
14.
go back to reference Tanguay JS, Ansari J, Buckley L, Fernando I (2009) Epithelial ovarian cancer: role of pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin in prolonging the platinum-free interval and cancer antigen 125 trends during treatment. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19:361–366PubMedCrossRef Tanguay JS, Ansari J, Buckley L, Fernando I (2009) Epithelial ovarian cancer: role of pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin in prolonging the platinum-free interval and cancer antigen 125 trends during treatment. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19:361–366PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Oaknin A, Barretina P, Pérez X et al (2010) CA-125 response patterns in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:87–91PubMedCrossRef Oaknin A, Barretina P, Pérez X et al (2010) CA-125 response patterns in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). Int J Gynecol Cancer 20:87–91PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ferrandina G, Ludovisi M, Corrado G et al (2008) Prognostic role of Ca125 response criteria and RECIST criteria: analysis of results from the MITO-3 phase III trial of gemcitabine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 109:187–193PubMedCrossRef Ferrandina G, Ludovisi M, Corrado G et al (2008) Prognostic role of Ca125 response criteria and RECIST criteria: analysis of results from the MITO-3 phase III trial of gemcitabine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 109:187–193PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Katsumata N, Fujiwara Y, Kamura T et al (2008) Phase II clinical trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (JNS002) in Japanese patients with mullerian carcinoma (epithelial ovarian carcinoma, primary carcinoma of fallopian tube, peritoneal carcinoma) having a therapeutic history of platinum-based chemotherapy: a phase II study of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group. Jpn J Clin Oncol 38:777–785PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Katsumata N, Fujiwara Y, Kamura T et al (2008) Phase II clinical trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (JNS002) in Japanese patients with mullerian carcinoma (epithelial ovarian carcinoma, primary carcinoma of fallopian tube, peritoneal carcinoma) having a therapeutic history of platinum-based chemotherapy: a phase II study of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group. Jpn J Clin Oncol 38:777–785PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Retrospective comparative study of irinotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for platinum-resistant or -refractory epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma
Authors
Ryoko Ichikawa
Yutaka Torii
Shuko Oe
Kyoko Kawamura
Rina Kato
Kiyoshi Hasegawa
Yasuhiro Udagawa
Publication date
01-11-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3268-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2014 Go to the issue