Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2010

01-09-2010 | Symposium: Complications of Hip Arthroplasty

Retrospective Analysis of Infection Rate After Early Reoperation in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Authors: Hussein Darwiche, MD, Wael K. Barsoum, MD, Alison Klika, MS, Viktor E. Krebs, MD, Robert Molloy, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 9/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Infection is a devastating complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Unavoidable reoperation during the acute recovery phase of hip arthroplasty has the potential for an increased infection rate but the risk is not well established nor is the fate of these infected hips.

Questions/purposes

We therefore report the infection rate for patients undergoing THA who returned to the operating room within 90 days of his or her index procedure for any surgical intervention on the same hip.

Methods

We identified 60 patients undergoing THA referred to or treated at our institution who required an unplanned and unavoidable return to the operating room during the acute recovery phase. The complications of the initial surgery that resulted in reoperation included instability, periprosthetic fracture, retained hardware, and nerve exploration. We then retrospectively reviewed the medical records to determine the infection rate and implant survivorship. The minimum followup was 1 month (average, 3.7 years; range, 1 month to 7 years) and included all patients who required resection before a minimum 2-year followup.

Results

The infection rate for this cohort was 20 of 60 (33%). Six of these 20 retained their implants at 2 years after the reoperation and were considered infection-free. Two-stage reimplantation or resection was eventually performed in 14 of the infected patients.

Conclusions

A high percentage of patients undergoing THA developed a deep infection after unavoidable reoperation during the acute recovery phase. The reasons for the reoperations were potentially modifiable complications and situations that deserve further investigation to delineate protocols to minimize the risk of infection in these patients.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:128–133.CrossRefPubMed Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:128–133.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bozic KJ, Ries MD. The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1746–1751.CrossRefPubMed Bozic KJ, Ries MD. The impact of infection after total hip arthroplasty on hospital and surgeon resource utilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1746–1751.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference England SP, Stern SH, Insall JN, Windsor RE. Total knee arthroplasty in diabetes mellitus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;260:130–134.PubMed England SP, Stern SH, Insall JN, Windsor RE. Total knee arthroplasty in diabetes mellitus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;260:130–134.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Galat DD, McGovern SC, Hanssen AD, Larson DR, Harrington JR, Clarke HD. Early return to surgery for evacuation of a postoperative hematoma after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2331–2336.CrossRefPubMed Galat DD, McGovern SC, Hanssen AD, Larson DR, Harrington JR, Clarke HD. Early return to surgery for evacuation of a postoperative hematoma after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2331–2336.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Greene KA, Wilde AH, Stulberg BN. Preoperative nutritional status of total joint patients. Relationship to postoperative wound complications. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6:321–325.CrossRefPubMed Greene KA, Wilde AH, Stulberg BN. Preoperative nutritional status of total joint patients. Relationship to postoperative wound complications. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6:321–325.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hanssen AD, Rand JA. Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:111–122.PubMed Hanssen AD, Rand JA. Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:111–122.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.CrossRefPubMed Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kurtz SM, Lau E, Schmier J, Ong KL, Zhao K, Parvizi J. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:984–991.CrossRefPubMed Kurtz SM, Lau E, Schmier J, Ong KL, Zhao K, Parvizi J. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:984–991.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lai K, Bohm ER, Burnell C, Hedden DR. Presence of medical comorbidities in patients with infected primary hip or knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:651–656.CrossRefPubMed Lai K, Bohm ER, Burnell C, Hedden DR. Presence of medical comorbidities in patients with infected primary hip or knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:651–656.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lie SA, Havelin LI, Furnes ON, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE. Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:504–509.PubMed Lie SA, Havelin LI, Furnes ON, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE. Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:504–509.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lubbeke A, Stern R, Garavaglia G, Zurcher L, Hoffmeyer P. Differences in outcomes of obese women and men undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:327–334.CrossRefPubMed Lubbeke A, Stern R, Garavaglia G, Zurcher L, Hoffmeyer P. Differences in outcomes of obese women and men undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:327–334.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Menashe S, Barrack RL, Bauer TW. Periprosthetic infection: what are the diagnostic challenges? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88 Suppl 4:138–147.CrossRefPubMed Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Menashe S, Barrack RL, Bauer TW. Periprosthetic infection: what are the diagnostic challenges? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88 Suppl 4:138–147.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Poss R, Thornhill TS, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Batte NJ, Sledge CB. Factors influencing the incidence and outcome of infection following total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;182:117–126.PubMed Poss R, Thornhill TS, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Batte NJ, Sledge CB. Factors influencing the incidence and outcome of infection following total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;182:117–126.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Rand JA, Fitzgerald RH, Jr. Diagnosis and management of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1989;20:201–210.PubMed Rand JA, Fitzgerald RH, Jr. Diagnosis and management of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1989;20:201–210.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Eitzen HE, Hart JB, French ML. The surgeon’s garb. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;153:204–209.PubMed Ritter MA, Eitzen HE, Hart JB, French ML. The surgeon’s garb. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;153:204–209.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Salvati EA, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Masri BA, Duncan CP. The infected total hip arthroplasty. Instruc Course Lect. 2003;52:223–245. Salvati EA, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Masri BA, Duncan CP. The infected total hip arthroplasty. Instruc Course Lect. 2003;52:223–245.
18.
go back to reference Sculco TP. The economic impact of infected joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1995;18:871–873.PubMed Sculco TP. The economic impact of infected joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1995;18:871–873.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Soohoo NF, Zingmond DS, Lieberman JR, Ko CY. Optimal timeframe for reporting short-term complication rates after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:705–711.CrossRefPubMed Soohoo NF, Zingmond DS, Lieberman JR, Ko CY. Optimal timeframe for reporting short-term complication rates after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:705–711.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Retrospective Analysis of Infection Rate After Early Reoperation in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Authors
Hussein Darwiche, MD
Wael K. Barsoum, MD
Alison Klika, MS
Viktor E. Krebs, MD
Robert Molloy, MD
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 9/2010
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1325-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2010

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2010 Go to the issue