Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2012

01-08-2012 | Gynecologic Oncology

Retroperitoneal vascular aberrations increase the risk of vascular injury during lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancers

Authors: Adam Gyimadu, Mehmet Coskun Salman, Musturay Karcaaltincaba, Kunter Yuce

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the frequency of aberrations of retroperitoneal great vessels in patients with gynecologic cancers who were scheduled for pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy, and to document the vascular complications which occurred during lymphadenectomy as well as the relationship of these vascular complications with vascular aberrations.

Methods

Patients with gynecologic cancers underwent a routine preoperative abdominal multi-detector computer tomography, and an intraoperative search for aberrations of the great vessels in the retroperitoneal region was undertaken. Intraoperative vascular complications were recorded and their relations to vascular aberrations were analyzed.

Results

The rate of vascular aberrations detected preoperatively by multi-detector computed tomography was 24.3 %. Vascular injuries occurred in six patients (16.2 %) during lymphadenectomy. Rate of intraoperative vascular injuries was significantly higher in patients who had vascular aberrations of retroperitoneal great vessels (44.4 vs. 7.1 %, p = 0.022).

Conclusions

Aberrations of retroperitoneal vessels are not uncommon and may increase the risk of vascular complications during lymphadenectomy. The risk of these complications may be decreased if aberrations are detected preoperatively.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zivanovic O, Sheinfeld J, Abu-Rustum NR (2008) Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). Gynecol Oncol 111(2 Suppl):S66–S69PubMedCrossRef Zivanovic O, Sheinfeld J, Abu-Rustum NR (2008) Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). Gynecol Oncol 111(2 Suppl):S66–S69PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ben-Shachar I, Pavelka J, Cohn DE, Copeland LJ, Ramirez N, Manolitsas T, Fowler JM (2005) Surgical staging for patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 105:487–493PubMedCrossRef Ben-Shachar I, Pavelka J, Cohn DE, Copeland LJ, Ramirez N, Manolitsas T, Fowler JM (2005) Surgical staging for patients presenting with grade 1 endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 105:487–493PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goff BA, Muntz HG, Paley PJ, Tamimi HK, Koh WJ, Greer BE (1999) Impact of surgical staging in women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 74:436–442PubMedCrossRef Goff BA, Muntz HG, Paley PJ, Tamimi HK, Koh WJ, Greer BE (1999) Impact of surgical staging in women with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 74:436–442PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Larson DM, Johnson K, Olson KA (1992) Pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol 79:998–1001PubMed Larson DM, Johnson K, Olson KA (1992) Pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol 79:998–1001PubMed
5.
go back to reference Homesley HD, Kadar N, Barrett RJ, Lentz SS (1992) Selective pelvic and periaortic lymphadenectomy does not increase morbidity in surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167:1225–1230PubMed Homesley HD, Kadar N, Barrett RJ, Lentz SS (1992) Selective pelvic and periaortic lymphadenectomy does not increase morbidity in surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167:1225–1230PubMed
6.
go back to reference Everett E, Tamimi H, Greer B, Swisher E, Paley P, Mandel L, Goff B (2003) The effect of body mass index on clinical/pathologic features, surgical morbidity, and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 90:150–157PubMedCrossRef Everett E, Tamimi H, Greer B, Swisher E, Paley P, Mandel L, Goff B (2003) The effect of body mass index on clinical/pathologic features, surgical morbidity, and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 90:150–157PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kilgore LC, Partridge EE, Alvarez RD, Austin JM, Shingleton HM, Noojin F 3rd, Conner W (1995) Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: survival comparisons of patients with and without pelvic node sampling. Gynecol Oncol 56:29–33PubMedCrossRef Kilgore LC, Partridge EE, Alvarez RD, Austin JM, Shingleton HM, Noojin F 3rd, Conner W (1995) Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: survival comparisons of patients with and without pelvic node sampling. Gynecol Oncol 56:29–33PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ayhan A, Tuncer ZS, Yarali H (1991) Complications of radical hysterectomy in women with early stage cervical cancer: clinical analysis of 270 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol 17:492–494PubMed Ayhan A, Tuncer ZS, Yarali H (1991) Complications of radical hysterectomy in women with early stage cervical cancer: clinical analysis of 270 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol 17:492–494PubMed
9.
go back to reference Bartle EJ, Pearce WH, Sun JH, Rutherford RB (1987) Infrarenal venous anomalies and aortic surgery: avoiding vascular injury. J Vasc Surg 6:590–593PubMed Bartle EJ, Pearce WH, Sun JH, Rutherford RB (1987) Infrarenal venous anomalies and aortic surgery: avoiding vascular injury. J Vasc Surg 6:590–593PubMed
10.
go back to reference Aljabri B, MacDonald PS, Satin R, Stein LS, Obrand DI, Steinmetz OK (2001) Incidence of major venous and renal anomalies relevant to aortoiliac surgery as demonstrated by computed tomography. Ann Vasc Surg 15:615–618PubMedCrossRef Aljabri B, MacDonald PS, Satin R, Stein LS, Obrand DI, Steinmetz OK (2001) Incidence of major venous and renal anomalies relevant to aortoiliac surgery as demonstrated by computed tomography. Ann Vasc Surg 15:615–618PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Scambia G, Greggi S, Mancuso S (1994) Anatomic abnormalities of the retroperitoneum encountered during aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(1 Pt 1):111–116PubMed Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Scambia G, Greggi S, Mancuso S (1994) Anatomic abnormalities of the retroperitoneum encountered during aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(1 Pt 1):111–116PubMed
12.
go back to reference Koc Z, Ulusan S, Oguzkurt L, Tokmak N (2007) Venous variants and anomalies on routine abdominal multi-detector row CT. Eur J Radiol 61:267–278PubMedCrossRef Koc Z, Ulusan S, Oguzkurt L, Tokmak N (2007) Venous variants and anomalies on routine abdominal multi-detector row CT. Eur J Radiol 61:267–278PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Downey RS, Sicard GA, Anderson CB (1989) Major retroperitoneal venous anomalies: surgical considerations. Surgery 107:359–365 Downey RS, Sicard GA, Anderson CB (1989) Major retroperitoneal venous anomalies: surgical considerations. Surgery 107:359–365
14.
go back to reference Fishman EK (2001) CT angiography: clinical applications in the abdomen. Radiographics 21:453–516 Fishman EK (2001) CT angiography: clinical applications in the abdomen. Radiographics 21:453–516
15.
go back to reference Guven K, Acunas B (2004) Multidetector computed tomography angiography of the abdomen. Eur J Radiol 52:44–55PubMedCrossRef Guven K, Acunas B (2004) Multidetector computed tomography angiography of the abdomen. Eur J Radiol 52:44–55PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Reed MD, Friedman AC, Nealey P (1982) Anomalies of the left renal vein: analysis of 433 CT scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 6:1124–1126PubMedCrossRef Reed MD, Friedman AC, Nealey P (1982) Anomalies of the left renal vein: analysis of 433 CT scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 6:1124–1126PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Trigaux JP, Vandroogenbroek S, De Wispelaere JF, Lacrosse M, Jamart J (1998) Congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava and left renal vein: evaluation with spiral CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:339–345PubMedCrossRef Trigaux JP, Vandroogenbroek S, De Wispelaere JF, Lacrosse M, Jamart J (1998) Congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava and left renal vein: evaluation with spiral CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:339–345PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Giordano JM, Trout HH (1986) Anomalies of the inferior vena cava. J Vasc Surg 3:924–928PubMed Giordano JM, Trout HH (1986) Anomalies of the inferior vena cava. J Vasc Surg 3:924–928PubMed
19.
go back to reference Vidal V, Monnet O, Jacquier A, Bartoli JM, Tropiano P (2010) Accessory iliac vein: surgical implications. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:398–403PubMedCrossRef Vidal V, Monnet O, Jacquier A, Bartoli JM, Tropiano P (2010) Accessory iliac vein: surgical implications. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:398–403PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Morrow CP, Curtin JP (1996) Gynecologic cancer surgery., Surgical anatomyChurchill Livingstone, New York, pp 97–109 Morrow CP, Curtin JP (1996) Gynecologic cancer surgery., Surgical anatomyChurchill Livingstone, New York, pp 97–109
21.
go back to reference Eitan R, Abu-Rustum NR, Walker JL, Barakat RR (2003) Ligation of an anatomic variant of renal vasculature during laparoscopic periaortic lymph node dissection: a cause of postoperative renal infarction. Gynecol Oncol 91:416–420PubMedCrossRef Eitan R, Abu-Rustum NR, Walker JL, Barakat RR (2003) Ligation of an anatomic variant of renal vasculature during laparoscopic periaortic lymph node dissection: a cause of postoperative renal infarction. Gynecol Oncol 91:416–420PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Retroperitoneal vascular aberrations increase the risk of vascular injury during lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancers
Authors
Adam Gyimadu
Mehmet Coskun Salman
Musturay Karcaaltincaba
Kunter Yuce
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2285-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2012 Go to the issue