Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 5/2011

01-10-2011 | Original Paper

Retrograde transureteral approach: a safe and efficient treatment for recurrent cystine renal stones

Authors: Lorenzo Ruggera, Martina Zanin, Paolo Beltrami, Filiberto Zattoni

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Most patients presenting cystinuria require multiple urological procedures during their lifetime. In this kind of patients the availability of minimally invasive procedure represents an advantage of minimizing the cumulative morbidity of several repeated treatments. Herein we report our experience using ureterorenoscopy (URS) for the treatment of recurrent renal cystine stones. From 2003 to 2007, 10 patients (4 males and 6 females) with one or multiple recurrent renal cystine stones underwent URS. Overall, 21 procedures have been performed. Mean maximum diameter of stones was 11.2 mm (range 5–30 mm). Either 8–9.5 F semirigid or 7.9 F flexible ureteroscopes were used. In 6 cases, stones were removed using a basket; in 9 procedures laser lithotripsy with flexible scope was performed; in 6 cases renal calculi were pulled down in the ureter using flexible instrument and then shattered with laser introduced by semirigid instrument. Stone-free status was defined as the absence of any residual fragment. A complete stone clearance was obtained in 15 out of 21 procedures (71%). In 5 cases (24%) significant residual fragments occurred; in the remaining case (5%) URS was ineffective. In 5 out of these unsuccessful procedures, stone clearance was obtained with auxiliary treatments. The last patient has not been treated yet. No major complications occurred as a result of the procedures. URS offers excellent advantages in case of recurrent hard calculi such as cystine stones. Minimally invasive procedures allow satisfactory outcomes, improving patients’ quality of life.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tiselius HG (2005) Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts? Urol Res 33:185–190PubMedCrossRef Tiselius HG (2005) Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts? Urol Res 33:185–190PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P, Buck C, Conort P, Gallucci M (2001) Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol 40:362–371PubMedCrossRef Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P, Buck C, Conort P, Gallucci M (2001) Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol 40:362–371PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Paik ML, Wainstein MA, Spirnak JP, Hampel N, Resnick MI (1998) Current indications for open stone surgery in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol 159:374–379PubMedCrossRef Paik ML, Wainstein MA, Spirnak JP, Hampel N, Resnick MI (1998) Current indications for open stone surgery in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol 159:374–379PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lingeman JE (1996) Lithotripsy and surgery. Semin Nephrol 16:487–498PubMed Lingeman JE (1996) Lithotripsy and surgery. Semin Nephrol 16:487–498PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lingeman JE, Coury TA, Newman DM, Kahnoski RJ, Mertz JH, Mosbaugh PG, Steele RE, Woods JR (1987) Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 138:485–490PubMed Lingeman JE, Coury TA, Newman DM, Kahnoski RJ, Mertz JH, Mosbaugh PG, Steele RE, Woods JR (1987) Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 138:485–490PubMed
6.
go back to reference Havel D, Saussine C, Fath C, Lang H, Faure F, Jacqmin D (1998) Single stones of the lower pole of the kidney. Comparative results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Eur Urol 33:396–400PubMedCrossRef Havel D, Saussine C, Fath C, Lang H, Faure F, Jacqmin D (1998) Single stones of the lower pole of the kidney. Comparative results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Eur Urol 33:396–400PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference May DJ, Chandhoke PS (1998) Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary lower pole renal calculi. J Urol 159:24–27PubMedCrossRef May DJ, Chandhoke PS (1998) Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary lower pole renal calculi. J Urol 159:24–27PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Graff J, Diederichs W, Schulze H (1988) Long-term follow-up in 1003 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients. J Urol 140:479–483PubMed Graff J, Diederichs W, Schulze H (1988) Long-term follow-up in 1003 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients. J Urol 140:479–483PubMed
9.
go back to reference Schmeller NT, Kersting H, Schuller J, Chaussy C, Schmiedt E (1984) Combination of chemolysis and shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of cystine renal calculi. J Urol 131:434–438PubMed Schmeller NT, Kersting H, Schuller J, Chaussy C, Schmiedt E (1984) Combination of chemolysis and shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of cystine renal calculi. J Urol 131:434–438PubMed
10.
go back to reference Wang LP, Wong HY, Griffith DP (1997) Treatment options in struvite stones. Urol Clin North Am 24:149–162PubMedCrossRef Wang LP, Wong HY, Griffith DP (1997) Treatment options in struvite stones. Urol Clin North Am 24:149–162PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Politis G, Griffith DP (1987) ESWL: stone-free efficacy based upon stone size and location. World J Urol 5:255–258CrossRef Politis G, Griffith DP (1987) ESWL: stone-free efficacy based upon stone size and location. World J Urol 5:255–258CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Netto NR Jr, Claro JFA, Lemos GC, Cortado PL (1991) Renal calculi in lower pole calices: what is the best method of treatment? J Urol 146:721–723PubMed Netto NR Jr, Claro JFA, Lemos GC, Cortado PL (1991) Renal calculi in lower pole calices: what is the best method of treatment? J Urol 146:721–723PubMed
13.
go back to reference Locke DR, Newman RC, Steinbock GS, Finlayson B (1990) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in horseshoe kidneys. Urology 35:407–411PubMedCrossRef Locke DR, Newman RC, Steinbock GS, Finlayson B (1990) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in horseshoe kidneys. Urology 35:407–411PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sampaio FJB, Aragao AHM (1994) Limitations of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower caliceal stones: anatomic insight. J Endourol 8:241–247PubMedCrossRef Sampaio FJB, Aragao AHM (1994) Limitations of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower caliceal stones: anatomic insight. J Endourol 8:241–247PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Elbahnasy AM, Clayman RV, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Chandhoke P, Lingeman JE, Denstedt JD, Kahn R, Assimos DG, Nakada SY (1998) Lower-pole caliceal stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrostolithotomy, and flexible ureteroscopy: impact of radiographic spatial anatomy. J Endourol 12:113–119PubMedCrossRef Elbahnasy AM, Clayman RV, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Chandhoke P, Lingeman JE, Denstedt JD, Kahn R, Assimos DG, Nakada SY (1998) Lower-pole caliceal stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrostolithotomy, and flexible ureteroscopy: impact of radiographic spatial anatomy. J Endourol 12:113–119PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Elashry OM, Smith DS, Mcdougall EM, Clayman RV (1998) Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 159:676–682PubMedCrossRef Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Elashry OM, Smith DS, Mcdougall EM, Clayman RV (1998) Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 159:676–682PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Knoll T, Zöllner A, Wendt-Nordahl G, Michel MS, Alken P (2005) Cystinuria in childhood and adolescence: recommendations for diagnosis, treatment, and follow up. Pediatr Nephrol 20:19–24PubMedCrossRef Knoll T, Zöllner A, Wendt-Nordahl G, Michel MS, Alken P (2005) Cystinuria in childhood and adolescence: recommendations for diagnosis, treatment, and follow up. Pediatr Nephrol 20:19–24PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Yiu MK, Liu PL, Yiu TF, Chan AYT (1996) Clinical experience with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy of ureteral calculi. Lasers Surg Med 19:103–106PubMedCrossRef Yiu MK, Liu PL, Yiu TF, Chan AYT (1996) Clinical experience with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy of ureteral calculi. Lasers Surg Med 19:103–106PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Straub M, Strohmaier WL, Berg W, Beck B, Hoppe B, Laube N, Lahme S, Schmidt M, Hesse A, Koehrmann KU (2005) Diagnosis and metaphylaxis of stone disease Consensus concept of the National Working Committee on Stone Disease for the Upcoming German Urolithiasis Guideline. World J Urol 23:309–323PubMedCrossRef Straub M, Strohmaier WL, Berg W, Beck B, Hoppe B, Laube N, Lahme S, Schmidt M, Hesse A, Koehrmann KU (2005) Diagnosis and metaphylaxis of stone disease Consensus concept of the National Working Committee on Stone Disease for the Upcoming German Urolithiasis Guideline. World J Urol 23:309–323PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Katz G, Lencovsky Z, Pode D, Shapiro A, Caine M (1990) Place of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of cystine calculi. Urology 36:124–128PubMedCrossRef Katz G, Lencovsky Z, Pode D, Shapiro A, Caine M (1990) Place of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of cystine calculi. Urology 36:124–128PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schuster TG, Russell KY, Bloom DA, Koo HP, Faerber GJ (2002) Ureteroscopy for the treatment of urolithiasis in children. J Urol 167:1813PubMedCrossRef Schuster TG, Russell KY, Bloom DA, Koo HP, Faerber GJ (2002) Ureteroscopy for the treatment of urolithiasis in children. J Urol 167:1813PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Streem SB, Yost A, Mascha E (1996) Clinical implications of clinically insignificant stone fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 155:1186–1190PubMedCrossRef Streem SB, Yost A, Mascha E (1996) Clinical implications of clinically insignificant stone fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 155:1186–1190PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Retrograde transureteral approach: a safe and efficient treatment for recurrent cystine renal stones
Authors
Lorenzo Ruggera
Martina Zanin
Paolo Beltrami
Filiberto Zattoni
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0358-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Urolithiasis 5/2011 Go to the issue