Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 8/2015

01-08-2015 | Original Article – Clinical Oncology

RETRACTED ARTICLE: The prognostic relevance of node metastases in optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer

Authors: Cornelia Bachmann, Sara Y. Brucker, Bernhard Kraemer, Ralf Rothmund, Anette Staebler, Falko Fend, Diethelm Wallwiener, Eva-Maria Grischke

Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To delineate the relevance of pelvic and para-aortic node involvement in optimally cytoreduced (residual tumour <1 cm) stage IIIC ovarian cancer patients.

Methods

Ninety-five consecutive optimally cytoreduced (R ≤ 1 cm) patients with primary stage IIIc ovarian cancer underwent stage-related surgery and got adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Median follow-up: 53.5 months. All patients got systematic lymphadenectomy. On average, 24.7 pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes were removed per patient (range 1–60 nodes). Patients were stratified into three groups to evaluate node involvement (ratio: affected to resected nodes): (1) (=0); (2) (>0–≤0.5) >0 and ≤50 % of affected nodes; (3) (>0.5–≤1) >50 % of affected nodes. Clinical parameters were retrospectively evaluated. Kaplan–Meier survival curve was used to evaluate the prognostic value.

Results

Most often serous histology, histologic grade 3 and a node ratio >0–≤0.5 (61.1 %) were detected. Complete cytoreduction (R = 0 mm) has significant best prognostic impact compared to R > 0 mm–1 cm (OS: p = 0.047, PFS: p = 0.00). Node involvement was associated with serous histology and grade 3. Increasing node ratio leads to significant decreased OS (p = 0.019) and significant best OS was associated with node ratio >0–≤0.5.

Conclusions

The goal is optimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer. More extensive lymphadenectomy seems to play an important role in providing an accurate staging, and the node ratio might give prognostic information. Current prospective studies like the LION study (AGO-Ovar) had to investigate if these data have therapeutic implications and may be considered in future staging.
Literature
go back to reference Abe A, Furumoto H, Irahara M, Ino H, Kamada M, Naka O, Sasaki M, Kagawa T, Okitsu O, Kushiki N (2010) The impact of systematic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with optimally debulked ovarian cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 36(5):1023–1030PubMedCrossRef Abe A, Furumoto H, Irahara M, Ino H, Kamada M, Naka O, Sasaki M, Kagawa T, Okitsu O, Kushiki N (2010) The impact of systematic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with optimally debulked ovarian cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 36(5):1023–1030PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Aletti GD, Dowdy S, Podratz KC et al (2006) Role of lymphadenectomy in the management of grossly apparent advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(6):1862–1868PubMedCrossRef Aletti GD, Dowdy S, Podratz KC et al (2006) Role of lymphadenectomy in the management of grossly apparent advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(6):1862–1868PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bachmann C, Bachmann S, Fehm T, Staebler A, Becker S, Rothmund R, Gardanis C, Grischke EM, Wallwiener D, Solomayer EF (2012) Nodal status—its impact on prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138(2):261–267PubMedCrossRef Bachmann C, Bachmann S, Fehm T, Staebler A, Becker S, Rothmund R, Gardanis C, Grischke EM, Wallwiener D, Solomayer EF (2012) Nodal status—its impact on prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138(2):261–267PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Balbi G, Manganaro MA, Monteverde A, Landino I, Franzese C, Gioia F (2009) Ovarian cancer: lymph node metastases. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 30(3):289–291PubMed Balbi G, Manganaro MA, Monteverde A, Landino I, Franzese C, Gioia F (2009) Ovarian cancer: lymph node metastases. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 30(3):289–291PubMed
go back to reference Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS et al (2002) Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 20(5):1248–1259PubMedCrossRef Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS et al (2002) Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 20(5):1248–1259PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Carnino F, Fuda G et al (1997) Significance of lymph node sampling in epithelial carcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 65(3):467–472PubMedCrossRef Carnino F, Fuda G et al (1997) Significance of lymph node sampling in epithelial carcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 65(3):467–472PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Chan JK, Urban R, Hu JM et al (2007) The potential therapeutic role of lymph node resection in epithelial ovarian cancer: a study of 13918 patients. Br J Cancer 96(12):1817–1822 Epub 2007 May 22PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chan JK, Urban R, Hu JM et al (2007) The potential therapeutic role of lymph node resection in epithelial ovarian cancer: a study of 13918 patients. Br J Cancer 96(12):1817–1822 Epub 2007 May 22PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Chang SJ, Bristow RE, Ryu HS (2012) Prognostic significance of systematic lymphadenectomy as part of primary debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 126(3):381–386PubMedCrossRef Chang SJ, Bristow RE, Ryu HS (2012) Prognostic significance of systematic lymphadenectomy as part of primary debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 126(3):381–386PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Chekerov R, Braicu I, Castillo-Tong DC, Richter R, Cadron I, Mahner S, Woelber L, Marth C, Van Gorp T, Speiser P, Zeillinger R, Vergote I, Sehouli J (2013) Outcome and clinical management of 275 patients with advanced ovarian cancer International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology II to IV inside the European Ovarian Cancer Translational Research Consortium-OVCAD. Int J Gynecol Cancer 23(2):268–275PubMedCrossRef Chekerov R, Braicu I, Castillo-Tong DC, Richter R, Cadron I, Mahner S, Woelber L, Marth C, Van Gorp T, Speiser P, Zeillinger R, Vergote I, Sehouli J (2013) Outcome and clinical management of 275 patients with advanced ovarian cancer International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology II to IV inside the European Ovarian Cancer Translational Research Consortium-OVCAD. Int J Gynecol Cancer 23(2):268–275PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference di Re F, Baiocchi G, Fontanelli R, Grosso G, Cobellis L, Raspagliesi F, di Re E (1996) Systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy for advanced ovarian cancer: prognostic significance of node metastases. Gynecol Oncol 62(3):360–365PubMedCrossRef di Re F, Baiocchi G, Fontanelli R, Grosso G, Cobellis L, Raspagliesi F, di Re E (1996) Systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy for advanced ovarian cancer: prognostic significance of node metastases. Gynecol Oncol 62(3):360–365PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Du Bois A et al (2009) `Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials. Cancer 15:1234–1244CrossRef Du Bois A et al (2009) `Role of surgical outcome as prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a combined exploratory analysis of 3 prospectively randomized phase 3 multicenter trials. Cancer 15:1234–1244CrossRef
go back to reference Harter P, Gnauert K, Hils R et al (2007) Pattern and clinical predictors of lymph node metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17(6):1238–1244. Epub 2007 Apr 12PubMedCrossRef Harter P, Gnauert K, Hils R et al (2007) Pattern and clinical predictors of lymph node metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17(6):1238–1244. Epub 2007 Apr 12PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hoskins McGuir et al (1994) The effect of diameter of largest residual disease on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(4):974–979PubMedCrossRef Hoskins McGuir et al (1994) The effect of diameter of largest residual disease on survival after primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(4):974–979PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mahdi H, Thrall M, Kumar S, Hanna R, Seward S, Lockhart D, Morris RT, Swensen R, Munkarah AR (2011) The prognostic impact of the ratio of positive lymph nodes on survival of epithelial ovarian cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 103(7):724–729PubMedCrossRef Mahdi H, Thrall M, Kumar S, Hanna R, Seward S, Lockhart D, Morris RT, Swensen R, Munkarah AR (2011) The prognostic impact of the ratio of positive lymph nodes on survival of epithelial ovarian cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 103(7):724–729PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nomura H, Tsuda H, Susumu N, Fujii T, Banno K, Kataoka F, Tominaga E, Suzuki A, Chiyoda T, Aoki D (2011) Lymph node metastasis in grossly apparent stages I and II epithelial ovarian cancer. J Surg Oncol Nomura H, Tsuda H, Susumu N, Fujii T, Banno K, Kataoka F, Tominaga E, Suzuki A, Chiyoda T, Aoki D (2011) Lymph node metastasis in grossly apparent stages I and II epithelial ovarian cancer. J Surg Oncol
go back to reference Onda T, Yoshikawa H, Yasugi T et al (1998) Patients with ovarian carcinoma upstaged to stage III after systematic lymphadenctomy have similar survival to Stage I/II patients and superior survival to other Stage III patients. Cancer 83(8):1555–1560PubMedCrossRef Onda T, Yoshikawa H, Yasugi T et al (1998) Patients with ovarian carcinoma upstaged to stage III after systematic lymphadenctomy have similar survival to Stage I/II patients and superior survival to other Stage III patients. Cancer 83(8):1555–1560PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Panici PB, Maggioni A et al (2005) Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(8):560–566PubMedCrossRef Panici PB, Maggioni A et al (2005) Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(8):560–566PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pereira A, Pérez-Medina T, Magrina JF, Magtibay PM, Millan I, Iglesias E (2012) The role of lymphadenectomy in node-positive epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22(6):987–992PubMedCrossRef Pereira A, Pérez-Medina T, Magrina JF, Magtibay PM, Millan I, Iglesias E (2012) The role of lymphadenectomy in node-positive epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22(6):987–992PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Scarabelli C, Gallo A, Visentin MC et al (1997) Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer patients with no residual intraperitoneal disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer 7(1):18–26PubMedCrossRef Scarabelli C, Gallo A, Visentin MC et al (1997) Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer patients with no residual intraperitoneal disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer 7(1):18–26PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Suh DH, Kim TH, Kim JW, Kim SY, Kim HS, Lee TS, Chung HH, Kim YB, Park NH, Song YS (2013) Improvements to the FIGO staging for ovarian cancer: reconsideration of lymphatic spread and intraoperative tumor rupture. J Gynecol Oncol 24(4):352–358PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Suh DH, Kim TH, Kim JW, Kim SY, Kim HS, Lee TS, Chung HH, Kim YB, Park NH, Song YS (2013) Improvements to the FIGO staging for ovarian cancer: reconsideration of lymphatic spread and intraoperative tumor rupture. J Gynecol Oncol 24(4):352–358PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Takeshima N et al (2005) Lymph node metastasis in ovarian cancer: difference between serous and non-serous primary tumours. Gynecol Oncol 99(2):427–431PubMedCrossRef Takeshima N et al (2005) Lymph node metastasis in ovarian cancer: difference between serous and non-serous primary tumours. Gynecol Oncol 99(2):427–431PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ulker V, Kuru O, Numanoglu C, Akbayır O, Polat I, Uhri M (2014) Lymph node metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the ovary: review of a single-institution experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289(5):1087–1092. doi:10.1007/s00404-013-3078-3. Epub 2013 Nov 9PubMedCrossRef Ulker V, Kuru O, Numanoglu C, Akbayır O, Polat I, Uhri M (2014) Lymph node metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the ovary: review of a single-institution experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289(5):1087–1092. doi:10.​1007/​s00404-013-3078-3. Epub 2013 Nov 9PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wimberger P, Lehmann N, Kimmig R, Burges A, Meier W, Du Bois A (2007) Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group. Prognostic factors for complete debulking in advanced ovarian cancer and its impact on survival. An exploratory analysis of a prospectively randomized phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group (AGO-OVAR). Gynecol Oncol 106(1):69–74PubMedCrossRef Wimberger P, Lehmann N, Kimmig R, Burges A, Meier W, Du Bois A (2007) Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group. Prognostic factors for complete debulking in advanced ovarian cancer and its impact on survival. An exploratory analysis of a prospectively randomized phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group (AGO-OVAR). Gynecol Oncol 106(1):69–74PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The prognostic relevance of node metastases in optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer
Authors
Cornelia Bachmann
Sara Y. Brucker
Bernhard Kraemer
Ralf Rothmund
Anette Staebler
Falko Fend
Diethelm Wallwiener
Eva-Maria Grischke
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-1945-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 8/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine