Top

International Orthopaedics

Published in:

01-03-2017 | Original Paper

Results of primary total hip replacement with first generation Bousquet dual mobility socket with more than twenty five years follow up. About a series of two hundred and twelve hips

Authors: Thomas Neri, Remi Philippot, Frederic Farizon, Bertrand Boyer

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 3/2017

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of our study was to evaluate long-term survival and dislocation rate of this concept.

Methods

It was a retrospective study, on 212 hips using a Bousquet dual mobility Novae® tripodal socket (SERF). Mean follow-up was 25.3 years (95 to 372 months). Mean age at the time of the surgery was 53 years.

Results

Pre-operative mean Harris and PMA scores were respectively 54.14 and 11.2. Their respective last follow-up counterparts were 83.6 and 16.9; 25 year follow-up cup survival rate was 90.6%. No dislocation occurred, 45 hips were revised (including 17 cup aseptic loosenings, ten intra prosthetic dislocations, nine liner changes, seven stem failures, two sepsis).

Conclusion

Dual mobility socket global long term survival rate was comparable to similar cemented or uncemented series. The absence of dislocations proved the interest of dual mobility concept in hip stability. Implant improvements might widen DM socket indication.

Farizon F, de Lavison R, Azoulai JJ, Bousquet G (1998) Results with a cementless alumina-coated cup with dual mobility. A twelve-year follow-up study. Int Orthop 22:219–224CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Charnley J, Kamangar A, Longfield MD (1969) The optimum size of prosthetic heads in relation to the wear of plastic sockets in total replacement of the hip. Med Biol Eng 7:31–39CrossRefPubMed

Caton JH, Prudhon JL, Ferreira A et al (2014) A comparative and retrospective study of three hundred and twenty primary Charnley type hip replacements with a minimum follow up of ten years to assess whether a dual mobility cup has a decreased dislocation risk. Int Orthop 38:1125–1129. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2313-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Callaghan JJ, Templeton JE, Liu SS et al (2004) Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86–A:690–695CrossRefPubMed

Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF (2002) Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84–A:171–177CrossRefPubMed

Kim Y-H, Park J-W, Park J-S (2014) The 27 to 29-year outcomes of the PCA total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years old. J Arthroplasty 29:2256–2261. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.02.011 CrossRefPubMed

Bojescul JA, Xenos JS, Callaghan JJ, Savory CG et al (2003) Results of porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty without cement at fifteen years: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85–A:1079–1083CrossRefPubMed

Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, Farizon F (2012) Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop 36:511–518. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1289-4 CrossRefPubMed

Philippot R, Farizon F, Camilleri J-P et al (2008) Survival of cementless dual mobility socket with a mean 17 years follow-up. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 94:e23–e27. doi:10.1016/j.rco.2007.10.013 CrossRefPubMed

10.

DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121:20–32

11.

Massin P, Schmidt L, Engh CA (1989) Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration. An experimental study. J Arthroplast 4:245–251CrossRef

12.

Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632CrossRefPubMed

13.

Lecuire F, Benareau I, Rubini J, Basso M (2004) Intra-prosthetic dislocation of the Bousquet dual mobility socket. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 90:249–255CrossRefPubMed

14.

Aldinger PR, Jung AW, Pritsch M et al (2009) Uncemented grit-blasted straight tapered titanium stems in patients younger than fifty-five years of age. Fifteen to twenty-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1432–1439. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00297 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Yoon TR, Rowe S-M, Kim M-S et al (2008) Fifteen- to 20-year results of uncemented tapered fully porous-coated cobalt-chrome stems. Int Orthop 32:317–323. doi:10.1007/s00264-007-0337-6 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Grant P, Nordsletten L (2004) Total hip arthroplasty with the Lord prosthesis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86–A:2636–2641CrossRefPubMed

17.

Della Valle CJ, Mesko NW, Quigley L et al (2009) Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1130–1135. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00168 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Wroblewski BM (1986) 15-21-year results of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 211:30–35

19.

Prudhon J-L, Desmarchelier R, Hamadouche M et al (2015) Causes for revision of dual-mobility and standard primary total hip arthroplasty : Matched case–control study based on a prospective multicenter study of two thousand and forty four implants. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-3064-4 PubMed

20.

Geringer J, Boyer B, Farizon F (2011) Understanding the dual mobility concept for total hip arthroplasty. Investigations on a multiscale analysis-highlighting the role of arthrofibrosis. Wear 271:2379–2385. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2011.02.027 CrossRef

21.

Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA (2002) A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:649–661CrossRefPubMed

22.

Imbert L, Geringer J, Boyer B, Farizon F (2012) Wear analysis of hip explants, dual mobility concept: comparison of quantitative and qualitative analyses. Proc Inst Mech Eng J J Eng Tribol 226:838–853. doi:10.1177/1350650112451211 CrossRef

23.

Archibeck MJ, Surdam JW, Schultz SC et al (2006) Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years or younger. J Arthroplasty 21:476–483. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2005.08.011 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Netter JD, Hermida JC, Chen PC et al (2014) Effect of microseparation and third-body particles on dual-mobility crosslinked hip liner wear. J Arthroplasty 29:1849–1853. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.010 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop 471:965–970. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2639-2 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Lautridou C, Lebel B, Burdin G, Vielpeau C (2008) Survival of the cementless Bousquet dual mobility cup: minimum 15-year follow-up of 437 total hip arthroplasties. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 94:731–739. doi:10.1016/j.rco.2008.06.001 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Vermersch T, Viste A, Desmarchelier R, Fessy M-H (2015) Prospective longitudinal study of one hundred patients with total hip arthroplasty using a second-generation cementless dual-mobility cup. Int Orthop 39:2097–2101. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2985-2 CrossRefPubMed

Title: Results of primary total hip replacement with first generation Bousquet dual mobility socket with more than twenty five years follow up. About a series of two hundred and twelve hips
Authors: Thomas Neri
Remi Philippot
Frederic Farizon
Bertrand Boyer
Publication date: 01-03-2017
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: International Orthopaedics / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3373-2

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Results of primary total hip replacement with first generation Bousquet dual mobility socket with more than twenty five years follow up. About a series of two hundred and twelve hips

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation

Total hip arthroplasty instability treatment without dual mobility cups: brief overview and experience of other options

Dual-mobility arthroplasty failure: a rationale review of causes and technical considerations for revision

Early experience with dual mobility acetabular systems featuring highly cross-linked polyethylene liners for primary hip arthroplasty in patients under fifty five years of age: an international multi-centre preliminary study

Total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility cup in osteonecrosis of the femoral head in young patients: over ten years of follow-up

All dual mobility cups are not the same