Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Literature
1.
2.
Ryu A, Kim T, Lee H (2010) Evaluation of risk factors for the postpartum depression with Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Score. Korean J Perinatol 21:74–80
3.
Hein A, Rauh C, Engel A et al (2014) Socioeconomic status and depression during and after pregnancy in the Franconian Maternal Health Evaluation Studies (FRAMES). Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:755–763CrossRef
4.
Goecke TW, Reulach U, Lux MP et al (2009) Pre-, peri-and postpartum depression. Implications for clinical practice. Findings from FRAMES (Franconian Maternal Health Ecaluation Studies). Geburtsh Frauenheilk 69:740–741
5.
Mehta D, Quast C, Fasching PA et al (2012) The 5-HTTLPR polymorphism modulates the influence on environmental stressors on peripartum depression symptoms. J Affect Disord 136:1192–1197PubMedCrossRef
6.
Fasching PA, Faschingbauer F, Goecke TW et al (2012) Genetic variants in the tryptophan hydroxylase 2 gene (TPH2) and depression during and after pregnancy. J Psychiatr Res 46:1109–1117PubMedCrossRef
7.
Rauh C, Beetz A, Burger P et al (2012) Delivery mode and the course of pre- and postpartum depression. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:1407–1412PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Response to “Screening depression during and after pregnancy using the EPDS”
Authors
Alexander Hein
Peter A. Fasching
Tamme W. Goecke
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3337-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2014 Go to the issue

News and Views

Is transdermal menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) associated with an increased cardiovascular risk?

Letter to the Editor

“Win not by numbers, but by skill”: Tchartchian G, Hackethal A, Herrmann A, Bojahr B, Wallwiener C, Ohlinger R, Ebert AD, De Wilde RL. Evaluation of SprayShield™ adhesion barrier in a single center: randomized controlled study in 15 women undergoing reconstructive surgery after laparoscopic myomectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Apr 30. [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 24781718

Reply

Response to: Microsurgical principles should be considered in studies addressing adhesion prevention: Çağlar et al. (2014)

General Gynecology

Does Cabergoline help in decreasing endometrioma size compared to LHRH agonist? A prospective randomized study

Gynecologic Oncology

Construction of breast cancer gene regulatory networks and drug target optimization

Review

Ovary hyperstimulation syndrome accompanying molar pregnancy: case report and review of the literature