Published in:
01-06-2004 | Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care
Respiratory physiotherapy vs. suction: the effects on respiratory function in ventilated infants and children
Authors:
Eleanor Main, Rosemary Castle, Di Newham, Janet Stocks
Published in:
Intensive Care Medicine
|
Issue 6/2004
Login to get access
Abstract
Objective
To assess and compare the effects of physiotherapy and suction on expired tidal volume (VTE), respiratory compliance (Crs), resistance (Rrs) and arterial blood gases.
Design
Randomised cross-over study comparing outcomes after both treatments on the same day.
Setting
Intensive tertiary care units, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London.
Patients
One hundred children on full ventilatory support requiring physiotherapy. Paired measurements were obtained in 90 participants, and 7 others were excluded because of tracheal tube leak.
Interventions
Respiratory physiotherapy and suction.
Measurements and results
Physiotherapy lasted longer and required more saline and catheters per treatment. There were no significant group changes in VTE or Crs after either treatment, but a tendency for Rrs to fall following physiotherapy which reached significance in patients on volume-preset ventilation. There were also small but statistically significant reductions in HCO3
−, base excess and SaO2 after physiotherapy. VTE and Crs increased and Rrs decreased in excess of their 95% limits of agreement for normal variability in approximately twice as many subjects following physiotherapy than suction, these differences being significant for VTE and approaching significance for Crs and Rrs.
Conclusions
Physiotherapy appeared to have an advantage in reducing Rrs in some patients, but also produced changes in derived blood gas parameters. Within individuals, physiotherapy treatments were also more likely to produce improvements in VTE, Crs and Rrs than suction. Further research should identify sensitive patient selection criteria and assess longer-term effects of such treatments.