Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3/2011

01-08-2011 | Scientific Contribution

Respect for cultural diversity in bioethics. Empirical, conceptual and normative constraints

Author: Tomislav Bracanovic

Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

In contemporary debates about the nature of bioethics there is a widespread view that bioethical decision making should involve certain knowledge of and respect for cultural diversity of persons to be affected. The aim of this article is to show that this view is untenable and misleading. It is argued that introducing the idea of respect for cultural diversity into bioethics encounters a series of conceptual and empirical constraints. While acknowledging that cultural diversity is something that decision makers in bioethical contexts should try to understand and, when possible, respect, it is argued that this cultural turn ignores the typically normative role of bioethics and thus threatens to undermine its very foundations.
Literature
go back to reference Appel, J.M. 2005. Defining death: when physicians and families differ. Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 641–642.PubMedCrossRef Appel, J.M. 2005. Defining death: when physicians and families differ. Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 641–642.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Barkow, J.H., L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby (eds.). 1992. The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Barkow, J.H., L. Cosmides, and J. Tooby (eds.). 1992. The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Boyd, R., and P.J. Richerson. 1985. Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Boyd, R., and P.J. Richerson. 1985. Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Brandt, R. 1967. Ethical relativism. In The encyclopedia of philosophy, vol. 3, ed. Paul Edwards, 75–78. New York: Macmillan. Brandt, R. 1967. Ethical relativism. In The encyclopedia of philosophy, vol. 3, ed. Paul Edwards, 75–78. New York: Macmillan.
go back to reference Brody, H. 1997. Medical bioethics and cultural diversity. Indian Journal of Pediatrics 64: 277–284.PubMedCrossRef Brody, H. 1997. Medical bioethics and cultural diversity. Indian Journal of Pediatrics 64: 277–284.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Callahan, D. 2003. Bioethics. In Encyclopedia of bioethics, 3rd ed, ed. S.G. Post, 278–287. New York: Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference. Callahan, D. 2003. Bioethics. In Encyclopedia of bioethics, 3rd ed, ed. S.G. Post, 278–287. New York: Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference.
go back to reference Carese, J.A., and J. Sugarman. 2006. The inescapable relevance of bioethics for the practicing clinician. Chest 130: 1864–1872.CrossRef Carese, J.A., and J. Sugarman. 2006. The inescapable relevance of bioethics for the practicing clinician. Chest 130: 1864–1872.CrossRef
go back to reference Childress, J.F. 2007. Methods in bioethics. In The Oxford handbook of bioethics, ed. B. Steinbock, 15–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Childress, J.F. 2007. Methods in bioethics. In The Oxford handbook of bioethics, ed. B. Steinbock, 15–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Coward, H., and T. Sidhu. 2008. Hindu and Sikh bioethics. In The Cambridge textbook of bioethics, ed. P.A. Singer, and A.M. Viens, 403–407. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Coward, H., and T. Sidhu. 2008. Hindu and Sikh bioethics. In The Cambridge textbook of bioethics, ed. P.A. Singer, and A.M. Viens, 403–407. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Durham, W.H. 1991. Coevolution: Genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Durham, W.H. 1991. Coevolution: Genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
go back to reference Dworkin, R. 1993. Life’s dominion: An argument about abortion, euthanasia, and individual freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Dworkin, R. 1993. Life’s dominion: An argument about abortion, euthanasia, and individual freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
go back to reference Häyry, H. 1998. Should the decisions of ethics committees be based on community values? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1: 57–60. Häyry, H. 1998. Should the decisions of ethics committees be based on community values? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1: 57–60.
go back to reference Hedgecoe, A.M. 2004. Critical bioethics: Beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. Bioethics 18: 120–143.PubMedCrossRef Hedgecoe, A.M. 2004. Critical bioethics: Beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. Bioethics 18: 120–143.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Irvine, R., J. McPhee, and I.H. Kerridge. 2002. The challenge of cultural and ethical pluralism to medical practice. Medical Journal of Australia 176: 174–175.PubMed Irvine, R., J. McPhee, and I.H. Kerridge. 2002. The challenge of cultural and ethical pluralism to medical practice. Medical Journal of Australia 176: 174–175.PubMed
go back to reference Koenig, B.A., and P.A. Marshall. 2003. Anthropology and bioethics. In Encyclopedia of bioethics, 3rd ed, ed. S.G. Post, 215–225. New York: Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference. Koenig, B.A., and P.A. Marshall. 2003. Anthropology and bioethics. In Encyclopedia of bioethics, 3rd ed, ed. S.G. Post, 215–225. New York: Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference.
go back to reference Kopelman, L.M. 1994. Female circumcision/genital mutilation and ethical relativism. Second Opinion 20: 55–71.PubMed Kopelman, L.M. 1994. Female circumcision/genital mutilation and ethical relativism. Second Opinion 20: 55–71.PubMed
go back to reference Kroeber, A.L., and C. Kluckhohn. 1952. Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum. Kroeber, A.L., and C. Kluckhohn. 1952. Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum.
go back to reference McNaughton, D. 1988. Moral vision: An introduction to ethics. Oxford: Blackwell. McNaughton, D. 1988. Moral vision: An introduction to ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
go back to reference Moody-Adams, M. 1997. Fieldwork in familiar places: morality, culture, and philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Moody-Adams, M. 1997. Fieldwork in familiar places: morality, culture, and philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Muramoto, O. 2008. Jehovah’s Witness bioethics. In The Cambridge textbook of bioethics, ed. P.A. Singer, and A.M. Viens, 416–423. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Muramoto, O. 2008. Jehovah’s Witness bioethics. In The Cambridge textbook of bioethics, ed. P.A. Singer, and A.M. Viens, 416–423. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Pellegrino, E.D. 2007. Introduction: Culture and bioethics: Where ethics and mores meet. In African American bioethics: Culture, race, and identity, ed. L.J. Prograis Jr., and E.D. Pellegrino, ix–xxi. Washington D.C: Georgetown University Press. Pellegrino, E.D. 2007. Introduction: Culture and bioethics: Where ethics and mores meet. In African American bioethics: Culture, race, and identity, ed. L.J. Prograis Jr., and E.D. Pellegrino, ix–xxi. Washington D.C: Georgetown University Press.
go back to reference Pence, G. 1993. Virtue theory. In A companion to ethics, ed. P. Singer, 249–258. Oxford: Blackwell. Pence, G. 1993. Virtue theory. In A companion to ethics, ed. P. Singer, 249–258. Oxford: Blackwell.
go back to reference Rachels, J. 2003. The elements of moral philosophy, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. Rachels, J. 2003. The elements of moral philosophy, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Singer, P. 1993. Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Singer, P. 1993. Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Singer, P.A., and A.M. Viens (eds.). 2008. The Cambridge textbook of bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Singer, P.A., and A.M. Viens (eds.). 2008. The Cambridge textbook of bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (ed.). 2008a. Moral psychology, vol. 1: The evolution of morality: Adaptations and innateness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (ed.). 2008a. Moral psychology, vol. 1: The evolution of morality: Adaptations and innateness. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
go back to reference Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (ed.). 2008b. Moral psychology, vol. 3: The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (ed.). 2008b. Moral psychology, vol. 3: The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
go back to reference Sutton, M.Q., and E.N. Anderson. 2010. Introduction to cultural ecology. Lanham: Altamira Press. Sutton, M.Q., and E.N. Anderson. 2010. Introduction to cultural ecology. Lanham: Altamira Press.
go back to reference Thomson, J.J. 1971. A defense of abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1: 47–66. Thomson, J.J. 1971. A defense of abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1: 47–66.
go back to reference Triandis, H.C. 2007. Culture and psychology: A history of the study of their relationship. In Handbook of cultural psychology, ed. S. Kitayama, and D. Cohen, 59–76. New York: The Guilford Press. Triandis, H.C. 2007. Culture and psychology: A history of the study of their relationship. In Handbook of cultural psychology, ed. S. Kitayama, and D. Cohen, 59–76. New York: The Guilford Press.
go back to reference Tylor, E.B. 1871. Primitive culture. New York: Harper. Tylor, E.B. 1871. Primitive culture. New York: Harper.
go back to reference Veatch, R.M. 1999. The conscience clause: how much individual choice in defining death can our society tolerate? In The definition of death: Contemporary controversies, ed. S.J. Youngner, R.M. Arnold, and R. Schapiro, 137–160. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Veatch, R.M. 1999. The conscience clause: how much individual choice in defining death can our society tolerate? In The definition of death: Contemporary controversies, ed. S.J. Youngner, R.M. Arnold, and R. Schapiro, 137–160. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
go back to reference Williams, G.C. 1996. Plan and purpose in nature: The limits of Darwinian evolution. London: Phoenix. Williams, G.C. 1996. Plan and purpose in nature: The limits of Darwinian evolution. London: Phoenix.
Metadata
Title
Respect for cultural diversity in bioethics. Empirical, conceptual and normative constraints
Author
Tomislav Bracanovic
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1386-7423
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8633
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-010-9299-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3/2011 Go to the issue

Scientific Contribution

Evidence and the end of medicine