Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Conflict and Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Case study

Researching violence against women and girls in South Sudan: ethical and safety considerations and strategies

Authors: Manuel Contreras-Urbina, Alexandra Blackwell, Maureen Murphy, Mary Ellsberg

Published in: Conflict and Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Globally, it is estimated that at least one out of every three women experiences violence by an intimate partner and/or non-partner throughout their lifetime. Women and girls are at even higher risk of violence in conflict and humanitarian crises. Although effort has expanded to build rigorous evidence and research on violence against women and girls (VAWG) among conflict-affected populations, methodological and ethical challenges remain. Basic ethical research practices are more challenging in conflict-affected populations and therefore require supplementary protections. While it is important to follow international ethical guidelines, in practice it is sometimes difficult depending on the setting. The aim of this paper is to present the main ethical challenges that occur when conducting research on VAWG in conflict and humanitarian settings, as well as potential strategies to address these challenges, based on a recent study carried out in South Sudan in 2016.

Case presentation

This paper provides an analysis utilizing the World Health Organization guidelines on doing research on VAWG and in conflict and humanitarian settings. The paper analyses four main components: the first component is a risk-benefit assessment, which includes identifying the research gap and evaluating feasibility with local stakeholders. The second component is a methodological and conceptual approach, which involves both local stakeholders and external experts in order to develop flexible methods that can be used in a volatile conflict setting. The third component is safety considerations, which emphasizes the importance of collaborating with a partner with strong local networks. The last component is analysis and research uptake. This component describes the importance of developing different research products, and disseminating them in a way to ensure they would be relevant and minimize any risks to the participants.

Conclusions

The study in South Sudan provided an excellent opportunity to put into practice the international ethical guidelines to carry out research on VAWG in conflict and humanitarian settings. The study enabled the research team to reflect on the guidelines and develop strategies to cope with new methodological and ethical challenges that arose in this complex setting, adapting the guidelines, as necessary. It demonstrated the necessity of developing a strong yet adaptable methodology with multiple alternative plans to solve any safety or ethical issues that occur throughout the entirety of the study. It also revealed the importance of collaborating with an implementing partner and gathering input from both local and international stakeholders on research design, analysis and uptake. Most importantly, the study in South Sudan emphasized that this type of complex research requires significant planning, in addition to substantial financial and human resources. Donor buy-in and flexibility is therefore essential.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Devries KM, Mak JY, Garcia-Moreno C, Petzold M, Child JC, Falder G, Lim S, Bacchus LJ, Engell RE, Rosenfeld L, Pallitto C. The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science. 2013;340(6140):1527–8.CrossRef Devries KM, Mak JY, Garcia-Moreno C, Petzold M, Child JC, Falder G, Lim S, Bacchus LJ, Engell RE, Rosenfeld L, Pallitto C. The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science. 2013;340(6140):1527–8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Global Women’s Institute and the International Rescue Committee. No Safe Place: A Lifetime of Violence for Conflict-Affected Women and Girls in South Sudan. Washington DC: George Washington University and London: IRC; 2017. Global Women’s Institute and the International Rescue Committee. No Safe Place: A Lifetime of Violence for Conflict-Affected Women and Girls in South Sudan. Washington DC: George Washington University and London: IRC; 2017.
3.
go back to reference Department of Health E. The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. J Am Coll Dentists. 2014;81(3):4. Department of Health E. The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. J Am Coll Dentists. 2014;81(3):4.
4.
go back to reference Ellsberg M, Heise L. Putting women’s safety first: ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. Ellsberg M, Heise L. Putting women’s safety first: ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
5.
go back to reference World Health Organization. WHO ethical and safety recommendations for researching, documenting and monitoring sexual violence in emergencies. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. World Health Organization. WHO ethical and safety recommendations for researching, documenting and monitoring sexual violence in emergencies. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
6.
go back to reference Sudan Human Security Baseline Assessment. “Women and Armed Violence in South Sudan.” 2012. Sudan Human Security Baseline Assessment. “Women and Armed Violence in South Sudan.” 2012.
7.
go back to reference Deng DK. Challenges of accountability: an assessment of dispute resolution processes in rural South Sudan. South Sudan: South Sudan Law Society (SSLS); 2013. Deng DK. Challenges of accountability: an assessment of dispute resolution processes in rural South Sudan. South Sudan: South Sudan Law Society (SSLS); 2013.
8.
go back to reference Jok JM. Violence and resilience: women, war and the realities of everyday life in Sudan. Ahfad J. 2006;23(2):58. Jok JM. Violence and resilience: women, war and the realities of everyday life in Sudan. Ahfad J. 2006;23(2):58.
9.
go back to reference World Health Organization, 2005. WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: summary report of initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. World Health Organization, 2005. WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: summary report of initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses.
10.
go back to reference Ford N, Mills EJ, Zachariah R, Upshur R. Ethics of conducting research in conflict settings. Confl Heal. 2009 Dec;3(1):7.CrossRef Ford N, Mills EJ, Zachariah R, Upshur R. Ethics of conducting research in conflict settings. Confl Heal. 2009 Dec;3(1):7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Graham A, Powell MA, Taylor N, Anderson D, Fitzgerald R. Ethical Research Involving Children. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti; 2013. Graham A, Powell MA, Taylor N, Anderson D, Fitzgerald R. Ethical Research Involving Children. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti; 2013.
12.
go back to reference Schenk K and Williamson J. Ethical Approaches to Gathering Information from Children and Adolescents in International Settings: Guidelines and Resources. Washington, DC: Population Council. 2005. Schenk K and Williamson J. Ethical Approaches to Gathering Information from Children and Adolescents in International Settings: Guidelines and Resources. Washington, DC: Population Council. 2005.
13.
go back to reference Ellsberg M, Heise L. Bearing witness: ethics in domestic violence research. Lancet. 2002;359(9317):1599–604.CrossRef Ellsberg M, Heise L. Bearing witness: ethics in domestic violence research. Lancet. 2002;359(9317):1599–604.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Researching violence against women and girls in South Sudan: ethical and safety considerations and strategies
Authors
Manuel Contreras-Urbina
Alexandra Blackwell
Maureen Murphy
Mary Ellsberg
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Conflict and Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1752-1505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-019-0239-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Conflict and Health 1/2019 Go to the issue