Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 12/2010

01-12-2010 | Original paper

Research and comprehensive cancer control coalitions

Authors: Cynthia Vinson, Madeline La Porta, William Todd, Neal A. Palafox, Katherine M. Wilson, Temeika Fairley

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 12/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The goal of cancer control research is “to generate basic knowledge about how to monitor and change individual and collective behavior and to ensure that knowledge is translated into practice and policy rapidly, effectively, and efficiently” (Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences in Cancer control framework and synthese rationale, 2010). Research activities span the cancer control continuum from prevention to early detection and diagnosis through treatment and survivorship (Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences in Cancer control framework and synthese rationale, 2010). While significant advancements have been made in understanding, preventing and treating cancer in the past few decades, these benefits have yielded disproportionate results in cancer morbidity and mortality across various socioeconomic and racial/ethnic subgroups (Ozols et al in J Clin Oncol, 25(1):146–1622, 2007). It has been a high priority since the beginning of the Comprehensive Cancer Control (CCC) movement to utilize research in the development and implementation of cancer plans in the states, tribes and tribal organizations, territories and US Pacific Island Jurisdictions. Nevertheless, dissemination and implementation of research in coalition activities has been challenging for many programs. Lessons learned from programs and coalitions in the implementation and evaluation of CCC activities, as well as resources provided by national partners, can assist coalitions with the translation of research into practice.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ozols RF, Herbst RS, Colson YL, Gralow J, Bonner J, Curran WJ Jr et al (2007) Clinical cancer advances 2006: major research advances in cancer treatment, prevention, and screening—a report from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 25(1):146–162CrossRefPubMed Ozols RF, Herbst RS, Colson YL, Gralow J, Bonner J, Curran WJ Jr et al (2007) Clinical cancer advances 2006: major research advances in cancer treatment, prevention, and screening—a report from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 25(1):146–162CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, Eheman C, Zauber AG, Anderson RN et al (2010) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer 116(3):544–573CrossRefPubMed Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, Eheman C, Zauber AG, Anderson RN et al (2010) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer 116(3):544–573CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Emmons KM, Viswanath K, Colditz GA (2008) The role of transdisciplinary collaboration in translating and disseminating health research: lessons learned and exemplars of success. Am J Prev Med 35((2, Supplement 1)):S204–S210CrossRefPubMed Emmons KM, Viswanath K, Colditz GA (2008) The role of transdisciplinary collaboration in translating and disseminating health research: lessons learned and exemplars of success. Am J Prev Med 35((2, Supplement 1)):S204–S210CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Marcus AC, Bull SS, Wilson KM (2004) Disseminating effective cancer screening interventions. Cancer 101(S5):1239–1250CrossRefPubMed Glasgow RE, Marcus AC, Bull SS, Wilson KM (2004) Disseminating effective cancer screening interventions. Cancer 101(S5):1239–1250CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA (1998) Getting research findings into practice: closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ 317(7156):465–468PubMed Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA (1998) Getting research findings into practice: closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ 317(7156):465–468PubMed
7.
go back to reference Haines A, Donald A (1998) Looking forward: getting research findings into practice: making better use of research findings. BMJ 317(7150):72–75PubMed Haines A, Donald A (1998) Looking forward: getting research findings into practice: making better use of research findings. BMJ 317(7150):72–75PubMed
8.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC (2003) Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health 93(8):1261CrossRefPubMed Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC (2003) Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health 93(8):1261CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lenfant C (2003) Clinical research to clinical practice—lost in translation? N Engl J Med 349(9):868–874CrossRefPubMed Lenfant C (2003) Clinical research to clinical practice—lost in translation? N Engl J Med 349(9):868–874CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Bradley EH, Webster TR, Baker F, Schlesinger M, Inouye SK, Barth MC, et al (2004) Translating research into practice: speeding the adoption of innovative health care programs Bradley EH, Webster TR, Baker F, Schlesinger M, Inouye SK, Barth MC, et al (2004) Translating research into practice: speeding the adoption of innovative health care programs
11.
go back to reference Balas EA, Boren SA (2000) Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 65–70 Balas EA, Boren SA (2000) Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 65–70
12.
go back to reference Designing for dissemination: final report (2002) 19–20 Designing for dissemination: final report (2002) 19–20
14.
go back to reference Schmittdiel J, Bodenheimer T, Solomon NA, Gillies RR, Shortell SM (2005) Brief report: the prevalence and use of chronic disease registries in physician organizations. J Gen Intern Med 20(9):855–858CrossRefPubMed Schmittdiel J, Bodenheimer T, Solomon NA, Gillies RR, Shortell SM (2005) Brief report: the prevalence and use of chronic disease registries in physician organizations. J Gen Intern Med 20(9):855–858CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Nass C, Simmons J, Bowen D, Guthrie T (2008) A case study of the south Puget intertribal planning agency’s comprehensive cancer control planning and community mobilization process. Prev Chronic Dis 5(2):A53PubMed Nass C, Simmons J, Bowen D, Guthrie T (2008) A case study of the south Puget intertribal planning agency’s comprehensive cancer control planning and community mobilization process. Prev Chronic Dis 5(2):A53PubMed
16.
go back to reference Ellestad A, Treml K, Remington P, Wegner MV, Baliker M (2009) Wisconsin’s Health Department-University Partnership Model for Comprehensive Cancer Control. Prev Chronic Dis 6(2):A58 Ellestad A, Treml K, Remington P, Wegner MV, Baliker M (2009) Wisconsin’s Health Department-University Partnership Model for Comprehensive Cancer Control. Prev Chronic Dis 6(2):A58
17.
go back to reference Northwest Georgia Regional Cancer Coalition, Inc. Chattooga County Tobacco Education, Awareness, Prevention and Cessation Project 2010:24 Northwest Georgia Regional Cancer Coalition, Inc. Chattooga County Tobacco Education, Awareness, Prevention and Cessation Project 2010:24
18.
go back to reference World Health Organization (2009) World Health Statistics 2009, pp 108–117 World Health Organization (2009) World Health Statistics 2009, pp 108–117
19.
go back to reference Williams R (2010) Cancer prevention and control research network summary progress report: 9-30-04 to 9-29-09 Williams R (2010) Cancer prevention and control research network summary progress report: 9-30-04 to 9-29-09
Metadata
Title
Research and comprehensive cancer control coalitions
Authors
Cynthia Vinson
Madeline La Porta
William Todd
Neal A. Palafox
Katherine M. Wilson
Temeika Fairley
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 12/2010
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9667-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2010

Cancer Causes & Control 12/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine