Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Cardiac

Reproducibility of aortic annulus measurements by computed tomography

Authors: Annika Schuhbaeck, Stephan Achenbach, Tobias Pflederer, Mohamed Marwan, Jasmin Schmid, Holger Nef, Johannes Rixe, Franziska Hecker, Christian Schneider, Michael Lell, Michael Uder, Martin Arnold

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate a systematic approach for measurement of aortic annulus dimensions by cardiac computed tomography.

Methods

CT data sets of 64 patients were evaluated. An oblique cross-section aligned with the aortic root was created by systematically identifying the caudal insertion points of the three aortic cusps and sequentially aligning them in a double oblique plane. Aortic annulus dimensions, distances of coronary ostia and a suitable fluoroscopic projection angle were independently determined by two observers.

Results

Interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for aortic annulus diameters were excellent (ICC 0.89–0.93). Agreement for prosthesis size selection was excellent (ĸ = 0.86 for mean, ĸ = 0.84 for area-derived and ĸ = 0.91 for circumference-derived diameter). Mean distances of the left/right coronary ostium were 13.4 ± 2.4/14.4 ± 2.8 mm for observer 1 and 13.2 ± 2.7/13.5 ± 3.2 mm for observer 2 (p = 0.30 and p = 0.0001, respectively; ICC 0.76/0.77 for left/right coronary artery). A difference of less than 10° for fluoroscopic projection angle was achieved in 84.3 % of patients.

Conclusions

A systematic approach to generate a double oblique imaging plane exactly aligned with the aortic annulus demonstrates high interobserver and intraobserver agreements for derived measurements which are not influenced by aortic root calcification.

Key Points

Systematic approach to generate a double oblique imaging plane for TAVI evaluation.
This method is straightforward and software independent.
An approach with high reproducibility, not influenced by aortic root calcification.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S et al (2012) 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1200–1254PubMedCrossRef Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S et al (2012) 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1200–1254PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Masson JB, Kovac J, Schuler G et al (2009) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: review of the nature, management, and avoidance of procedural complications. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv 2:811–820CrossRef Masson JB, Kovac J, Schuler G et al (2009) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: review of the nature, management, and avoidance of procedural complications. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv 2:811–820CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hayashida K, Bouvier E, Lefèvre T et al (2012) Potential mechanism of annulus rupture during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. doi:10.1002/ccd.24524 Hayashida K, Bouvier E, Lefèvre T et al (2012) Potential mechanism of annulus rupture during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. doi:10.​1002/​ccd.​24524
4.
go back to reference Blanke P, Reinöhl J, Schlensak C et al (2012) Prosthesis oversizing in balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation is associated with contained rupture of the aortic root. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 5:540–548PubMedCrossRef Blanke P, Reinöhl J, Schlensak C et al (2012) Prosthesis oversizing in balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation is associated with contained rupture of the aortic root. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 5:540–548PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Stabile E, Sorropago G, Cioppa A et al (2010) Acute left main obstructions following TAVI. EuroIntervention 6:100–105PubMedCrossRef Stabile E, Sorropago G, Cioppa A et al (2010) Acute left main obstructions following TAVI. EuroIntervention 6:100–105PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gurvitch R, Webb JG, Yuan R et al (2011) Aortic annulus diameter determination by multidetector computed tomography: reproducibility, applicability, and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv 4:1235–1245CrossRef Gurvitch R, Webb JG, Yuan R et al (2011) Aortic annulus diameter determination by multidetector computed tomography: reproducibility, applicability, and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv 4:1235–1245CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jilaihawi H, Kashif M, Fontana G et al (2012) Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1275–1286PubMedCrossRef Jilaihawi H, Kashif M, Fontana G et al (2012) Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1275–1286PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Lehmkuhl L et al (2012) Aortic annulus sizing: echocardiographic vs. computed tomography derived measurements in comparison with direct surgical sizing. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezs064 Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Lehmkuhl L et al (2012) Aortic annulus sizing: echocardiographic vs. computed tomography derived measurements in comparison with direct surgical sizing. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. doi:10.​1093/​ejcts/​ezs064
9.
go back to reference Jabbour A, Ismail TF, Moat N et al (2011) Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:2165–2173PubMedCrossRef Jabbour A, Ismail TF, Moat N et al (2011) Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:2165–2173PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Gurvitch R, LaBounty TM et al (2011) Multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 4:416–429CrossRef Leipsic J, Gurvitch R, LaBounty TM et al (2011) Multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 4:416–429CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Willson AB, Webb JG, LaBounty TM et al (2012) 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography predicts moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter retrospective analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1287–1294PubMedCrossRef Willson AB, Webb JG, LaBounty TM et al (2012) 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography predicts moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter retrospective analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1287–1294PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Binder RK, Webb JG, Willson AB et al (2013) The impact of integration of a multidetector computed tomography annulus area sizing algorithm on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicenter, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.036 Binder RK, Webb JG, Willson AB et al (2013) The impact of integration of a multidetector computed tomography annulus area sizing algorithm on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicenter, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jacc.​2013.​04.​036
13.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Schoenhagen P, Min JK, Leipsic JA (2012) SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6:366–380PubMedCrossRef Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Schoenhagen P, Min JK, Leipsic JA (2012) SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6:366–380PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gurvitch R, Wood DA, Leipsic J et al (2010) Multislice computed tomography for prediction of optimal angiographic deployment projections during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv 3:1157–1165CrossRef Gurvitch R, Wood DA, Leipsic J et al (2010) Multislice computed tomography for prediction of optimal angiographic deployment projections during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv 3:1157–1165CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Binder RK, Leipsic J, Wood D et al (2012) Prediction of optimal deployment projection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: angiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction of the aortic root versus multidetector computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 5:247–252PubMedCrossRef Binder RK, Leipsic J, Wood D et al (2012) Prediction of optimal deployment projection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: angiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction of the aortic root versus multidetector computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 5:247–252PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kurra V, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM et al (2010) Pre-procedural imaging of aortic root orientation and dimensions: comparison between x-ray angiographic planar imaging and 3-dimensional multidetector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv 3:105–113CrossRef Kurra V, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM et al (2010) Pre-procedural imaging of aortic root orientation and dimensions: comparison between x-ray angiographic planar imaging and 3-dimensional multidetector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv 3:105–113CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Arnold M, Achenbach S, Pfeiffer I et al (2012) A method to determine suitable fluoroscopic projections for transcatheter aortic valve implantation by computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6:422–428PubMedCrossRef Arnold M, Achenbach S, Pfeiffer I et al (2012) A method to determine suitable fluoroscopic projections for transcatheter aortic valve implantation by computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6:422–428PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wuest W, Anders K, Schuhbaeck A et al (2012) Dual source multidetector CT-angiography before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using a high-pitch spiral acquisition mode. Eur Radiol 22:51–58PubMedCrossRef Wuest W, Anders K, Schuhbaeck A et al (2012) Dual source multidetector CT-angiography before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using a high-pitch spiral acquisition mode. Eur Radiol 22:51–58PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Schuhbäck A, Min JK, Leipsic J (2013) Determination of the aortic annulus plane in CT imaging-a step-by-step approach. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 6:275–278CrossRef Achenbach S, Schuhbäck A, Min JK, Leipsic J (2013) Determination of the aortic annulus plane in CT imaging-a step-by-step approach. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 6:275–278CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tzikas A, Schultz CJ, Piazza N et al (2011) Assessment of the aortic annulus by multislice computed tomography, contrast aortography, and trans-thoracic echocardiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77:868–875PubMedCrossRef Tzikas A, Schultz CJ, Piazza N et al (2011) Assessment of the aortic annulus by multislice computed tomography, contrast aortography, and trans-thoracic echocardiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77:868–875PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hutter A, Opitz A, Bleiziffer S et al (2010) Aortic annulus evaluation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76:1009–1019PubMedCrossRef Hutter A, Opitz A, Bleiziffer S et al (2010) Aortic annulus evaluation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76:1009–1019PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL et al (2011) Feasibility and accuracy of a comprehensive multidetector computed tomography acquisition for patients referred for balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am Heart J 161:1106–1113PubMedCrossRef Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL et al (2011) Feasibility and accuracy of a comprehensive multidetector computed tomography acquisition for patients referred for balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am Heart J 161:1106–1113PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tamborini G, Fusini L, Gripari P et al (2012) Feasibility and accuracy of 3DTEE versus CT for the evaluation of aortic valve annulus to left main ostium distance before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 5:579–588CrossRef Tamborini G, Fusini L, Gripari P et al (2012) Feasibility and accuracy of 3DTEE versus CT for the evaluation of aortic valve annulus to left main ostium distance before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 5:579–588CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM, Brochet E et al (2010) Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:186–194PubMedCrossRef Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM, Brochet E et al (2010) Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:186–194PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reproducibility of aortic annulus measurements by computed tomography
Authors
Annika Schuhbaeck
Stephan Achenbach
Tobias Pflederer
Mohamed Marwan
Jasmin Schmid
Holger Nef
Johannes Rixe
Franziska Hecker
Christian Schneider
Michael Lell
Michael Uder
Martin Arnold
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3199-5

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

European Radiology 8/2014 Go to the issue