Top

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Systematic review

Reporting and utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) measures in orthopedic research and practice: a systematic review

Authors: Maggie E. Horn, Emily K. Reinke, Logan J. Couce, Bryce B. Reeve, Leila Ledbetter, Steven Z. George

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | Issue 1/2020

Abstract

Background

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System^Ⓡ (PROMIS^Ⓡ) is a dynamic system of psychometrically sound patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. There has been a recent increase in the use of PROMIS measures, yet little has been written about the reporting of these measures in the field of orthopedics. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to determine the uptake of PROMIS measures across orthopedics and to identify the type of PROMIS measures and domains that are most commonly used in orthopedic research and practice.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using keywords and database-specific subject headings to capture orthopedic studies reporting PROMIS measures through November 2018. Our inclusion criteria were use of PROMIS measures as an outcome or used to describe a population of patients in an orthopedic setting in patients ≥ 18 years of age. We excluded non-quantitative studies, reviews, and case reports.

Results

Our final search yielded 88 studies published from 2013 through 2018, with 57% (50 studies) published in 2018 alone. By body region, 28% (25 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, hand), 36% (32 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle, foot), 19% (17 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the spine, 10% (9 studies) reported PROMIS measures in trauma patients, and 6% (5 studies) reported PROMIS measures in general orthopedic patients. The majority of studies reported between one and three PROMIS domains (82%, 73 studies). The PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) approach was most commonly used (81%, 72 studies). The most frequently reported PROMIS domains were physical function (81%, 71 studies) and pain interference (61%, 54 studies).

Conclusion

Our review found an increase in the reporting of PROMIS measures over the recent years. Utilization of PROMIS measures in orthopedic populations is clinically appropriate and can facilitate communication of outcomes across different provider types and with reduced respondent burden.

Registration

The protocol for this systematic review was designed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and is registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42018088260).

Available only for authorised users

Jones RS, Stukenborg GJ. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) use in surgical care: a scoping study. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(3):245–54.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.11.015.CrossRefPubMed

Nelson EC, Eftimovska E, Lind C, Hager A, Wasson JH, Lindblad S. Patient reported outcome measures in practice. BMJ. 2015;350:g7818. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7818.CrossRefPubMed

Hung M, Stuart AR, Higgins TF, Saltzman CL, Kubiak EN. Computerized adaptive testing using the PROMIS physical function item bank reduces test burden with less ceiling effects compared with the short musculoskeletal function assessment in orthopaedic trauma patients. 2014;28:J Orthopaedic Trauma, 439–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000000059.

Brodke DJ, Saltzman CL, Brodke DS. PROMIS for orthopaedic outcomes measurement. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24(11):744–9. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00404.CrossRefPubMed

Ader DN. Developing the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Med Care. 2007;45:S1–2. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000260537.45076.74.CrossRef

Cella D, Gershon R, Lai J-S, Choi S. The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(Suppl 1):133–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-007-9204-6.CrossRefPubMed

Gulledge CM, Lizzio VA, Smith DG, Guo E, Makhni EC. What are the floor and ceiling effects of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system computer adaptive test domains in orthopaedic patients? A systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.022.

Makhni EC, Meadows M, Hamamoto JT, Higgins JD, Romeo AA, Verma NN. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in the upper extremity: the future of outcomes reporting? J Shoulder Elbow Surg [Internet]. 2017 Feb;26(2):352–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.054.CrossRefPubMed

Finkelstein JA, Schwartz CE. Patient-reported outcomes in spine surgery: past, current, and future directions. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;31(2):155–64. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.1.SPINE18770.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Hunt KJ, Lakey E. Patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle surgery. Orthop Clin North Am [Internet]. 2018;49(2):277–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2017.11.014.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Sideri S, Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T. Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;100:103–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.003.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Innovation VH. Covidence systematic review software. Veritas Health Innovation Melbourne, VIC; 2017.

14.

Modesti PA, Reboldi G, Cappuccio FP, Agyemang C, Remuzzi G, Rapi S, et al. Panethnic differences in blood pressure in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147601. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147601.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:603–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Islam MM, Iqbal U, Walther B, Atique S, Dubey NK, Nguyen P-A, et al. Benzodiazepine use and risk of dementia in the elderly population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology. 2016;47(3-4):181–91. https://doi.org/10.1159/000454881.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Hung M, Baumhauer JF, Latt LD, Saltzman CL, SooHoo NF, Hunt KJ, et al. Validation of PROMIS ® physical function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(11):3466–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3097-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Hung M, Baumhauer JF, Brodsky JW, Cheng C, Ellis SJ, Franklin JD, et al. Psychometric comparison of the PROMIS physical function CAT with the FAAM and FFI for measuring patient-reported outcomes. Foot Ankle Int [Internet]. 2014;35(6):592–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100714528492.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Hung M, Franklin JD, Hon SD, Cheng C, Conrad J, Saltzman CL. Time for a paradigm shift with computerized adaptive testing of general physical function outcomes measurements. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713507905.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Hunt KJ, Alexander I, Baumhauer J, Brodsky J, Chiodo C, Daniels T, et al. The Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Outcomes Research (OFAR) network: feasibility of a multicenter network for patient outcomes assessment in foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(9):847–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100714544157.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Papuga MO, Beck CA, Kates SL, Schwarz EM, Maloney MD. Validation of GAITRite and PROMIS as high-throughput physical function outcome measures following ACL reconstruction. J Orthop Res. 2014;32(6):793–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22591.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Tyser AR, Beckmann J, Franklin JD, Cheng C, Hon SD, Wang A, et al. Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(10):2047–51.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.130.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Mellema JJ, O’Connor CM, Overbeek CL, Hageman MG, Ring D. The effect of feedback regarding coping strategies and illness behavior on hand surgery patient satisfaction and communication: a randomized controlled trial. Hand. 2015;10(3):503–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-015-9742-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Beckmann JT, Hung M, Bounsanga J, Wylie JD, Granger EK, Tashjian RZ. Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test in comparison to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Simple Shoulder Test in patients with rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(12):1961–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.025.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Morgan JH, Kallen MA, Okike K, Lee OC, Vrahas MS. PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test compared with other upper extremity outcome measures in the evaluation of proximal humerus fractures in patients older than 60 years. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(6):257–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000280.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Stuart AR, Higgins TF, Hung M, Weir CR, Kubiak EN, Rothberg DL, et al. Reliability in measuring preinjury physical function in orthopaedic trauma. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(12):527–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000392.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Fuchs DJ, Ho BS, LaBelle MW, Kelikian AS. Effect of arthroscopic evaluation of acute ankle fractures on PROMIS intermediate-term functional outcomes. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(1):51–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100715597657.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Ho B, Houck JR, Flemister AS, Ketz J, Oh I, DiGiovanni BF, et al. Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(9):911–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100716665113.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Beckmann JT, Hung M, Voss MW, Crum AB, Bounsanga J, Tyser AR. Evaluation of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system upper extremity computer adaptive test. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41(7):739–44.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.04.025.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Nota SPFT, Spit SA, Oosterhoff TCH, Hageman MGJS, Ring DC, Vranceanu A-M. Is social support associated with upper extremity disability? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(8):1830–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4892-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Parrish RC 2nd, Menendez ME, Mudgal CS, Jupiter JB, Chen NC, Ring D. Patient satisfaction and its relation to perceived visit duration with a hand surgeon. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41(2):257–62.e1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.11.015.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Peters RM, Menendez ME, Mellema JJ, Ring D, Vranceanu A-M. Sleep disturbance and upper-extremity disability. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016;4(1):35–40 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26894216.PubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Dasa V, Lensing G, Parsons M, Harris J, Volaufova J, Bliss R. Percutaneous freezing of sensory nerves prior to total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2016;23(3):523–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.011.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Oak SR, Strnad GJ, Bena J, Farrow LD, Parker RD, Jones MH, et al. Responsiveness comparison of the EQ-5D, PROMIS Global Health, and VR-12 Questionnaires in knee arthroscopy. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(12):2325967116674714. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116674714.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Papuga MO, Mesfin A, Molinari R, Rubery PT. Correlation of PROMIS physical function and pain CAT instruments with Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index in spine patients. Spine. 2016;41(14):1153–1159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001518.

36.

van Leeuwen WF, van der Vliet QMJ, Janssen SJ, Heng M, Ring D, Vranceanu A-M. Does perceived injustice correlate with pain intensity and disability in orthopaedic trauma patients? Injury. 2016;47(6):1212–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.02.018.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Hermanussen HH, Menendez ME, Chen NC, Ring D, Vranceanu A-M. Predictors of upper-extremity physical function in older adults. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016;4(4):359–65 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847850.PubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Koltsov JCB, Greenfield ST, Soukup D, Do HT, Ellis SJ. Validation of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system computerized adaptive tests against the foot and ankle outcome score for 6 common foot and ankle pathologies. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(8):870–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717709573.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Nixon DC, McCormick JJ, Johnson JE, Klein SE. PROMIS pain interference and physical function scores correlate with the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) in patients with hallux valgus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(11):2775–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5476-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Oh Y, Drijkoningen T, Menendez ME, Claessen FMAP, Ring D. The influence of psychological factors on the Michigan Hand Questionnaire. Hand. 2017 Mar;12(2):197–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944716642765.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Beleckas CM, Padovano A, Guattery J, Chamberlain AM, Keener JD, Calfee RP. Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) versus physical function (PF) computer adaptive tests (CATs) in upper extremity clinics. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(11):867–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Sheean AJ, Schmitz MR, Ward CL, Barrow AE, Tennent DJ, Roach CJ, et al. Assessment of disability related to femoroacetabular impingement syndrome by use of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System (PROMIS) and objective measures of physical performance. Am J Sports Med [Internet]. 2017 Sep;45(11):2476–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517708793.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Hancock KJ, Glass N, Anthony CA, Hettrich CM, Albright J, Amendola A, et al. Performance of PROMIS for healthy patients undergoing meniscal surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jun 7;99(11):954–8. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00848.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Hung M, Saltzman CL, Greene T, Voss MW, Bounsanga J, Gu Y, et al. Evaluating instrument responsiveness in joint function: the HOOS JR, the KOOS JR, and the PROMIS PF CAT. J Orthop Res. 2018;36(4):1178–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23739.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Anthony CA, Glass N, Hancock K, Bollier M, Hettrich CM, Wolf BR. Preoperative performance of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system in patients with rotator cuff pathology. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(10):1770–4.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.04.018.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Anthony CA, Glass NA, Hancock K, Bollier M, Wolf BR, Hettrich CM. Performance of PROMIS instruments in patients with shoulder instability. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(2):449–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516668304.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Dowdle SB, Glass N, Anthony CA, Hettrich CM. Use of PROMIS for patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(9):2325967117726044. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117726044.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Owen RJ, Zebala LP, Peters C, McAnany S. PROMIS physical function correlation with NDI and mJOA in the surgical cervical myelopathy patient population. Spine [Internet]. 2018;43(8):550–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002373.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Purvis TE, Andreou E, Neuman BJ, Riley LH 3rd, Skolasky RL. Concurrent validity and responsiveness of PROMIS health domains among patients presenting for anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine. 2017;42(23):E1357–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002347.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Kleimeyer JP, Wood KB, Lønne G, Herzog T, Ju K, Beyer L, et al. Surgery for refractory coccygodynia: operative versus nonoperative treatment. Spine. 2017;42(16):1214–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002053.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Merrill RK, Zebala LP, Peters C, Qureshi SA, McAnany SJ. Impact of depression on patient-reported outcome measures after lumbar spine decompression. Spine. 2018;43(6):434–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002329.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Kaat AJ, Rothrock NE, Vrahas MS, OʼToole RV, Buono SK, Zerhusen T Jr, et al. Longitudinal validation of the PROMIS physical function item bank in upper extremity trauma. J Orthop Trauma [Internet]. 2017 Oct;31(10):e321–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000924.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Henn RF 3rd, Dubina AG, Jauregui JJ, Smuda MP, Tracy JK. The Maryland Orthopaedic Registry (MOR): design and baseline characteristics of a prospective registry. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017;8(4):301–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.04.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Kazmers NH, Hung M, Rane AA, Bounsanga J, Weng C, Tyser AR. Association of physical function, anxiety, and pain interference in nonshoulder upper extremity patients using the PROMIS platform. J Hand Surg Am [Internet]. 2017;42(10):781–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.05.008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

St John MJ, Mitten D, Hammert WC. Efficacy of PROMIS pain interference and Likert pain scores to assess physical function. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(9):705–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.004.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Boody BS, Bhatt S, Mazmudar AS, Hsu WK, Rothrock NE, Patel AA. Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerized adaptive tests in cervical spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;28(3):268–79. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.7.SPINE17661.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Stoop N, Menendez ME, Mellema JJ, Ring D. The PROMIS Global Health Questionnaire correlates with the QuickDASH in patients with upper extremity illness. Hand. 2018;13(1):118–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944717691127.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Beleckas CM, Wright M, Prather H, Chamberlain A, Guattery J, Calfee RP. Relative prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with upper extremity conditions. J Hand Surg Am. 2018;43(6):571.e1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.12.006.CrossRef

59.

Fischerauer SF, Talaei-Khoei M, Vissers FL, Chen N, Vranceanu A-M. Pain anxiety differentially mediates the association of pain intensity with function depending on level of intolerance of uncertainty. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;97:30–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.11.006.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Hung M, Voss MW, Bounsanga J, Gu Y, Granger EK, Tashjian RZ. Psychometrics of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function instrument administered by computerized adaptive testing and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand in the orthopedic elbow patient population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(3):515–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Haskell A, Kim T. Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System data collection in a private orthopedic surgery practice. Foot Ankle Int [Internet]. 2018 May;39(5):517–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717753967.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Vincent HK, Hagen JE, Zdziarski-Horodyski LA, Patrick M, Sadasivan KK, Guenther R, et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System outcome measures and mental health in orthopaedic trauma patients during early recovery. J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Sep;32(9):467–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001245.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Schwartz CE, Zhang J, Rapkin BD, Finkelstein JA. Reconsidering the minimally important difference: evidence of instability over time and across groups. Spine J. 2019;19(4):726–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.09.010.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Rubery PT, Houck J, Mesfin A, Molinari R, Papuga MO. Preoperative Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores assist in predicting early postoperative success in lumbar discectomy. Spine [Internet]. 2019;44(5):325–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002823.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Raad M, Jain A, Huang M, Skolasky RL, Sciubba DM, Kebaish KM, et al. Validity and responsiveness of PROMIS in adult spinal deformity: the need for a self-image domain. Spine J. 2019 Jan;19(1):50–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.07.014.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Purvis TE, Neuman BJ, Riley LH 3rd, Skolasky RL. Discriminant ability, concurrent validity, and responsiveness of PROMIS health domains among patients with lumbar degenerative disease undergoing decompression with or without arthrodesis. Spine. 2018;43(21):1512–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002661.CrossRefPubMed

67.

Patton RS, Runner RP, Lyons RJ, Bradbury TL. Clinical outcomes of patients with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury after direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(9):2919–26.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.032.CrossRefPubMed

68.

Patterson BM, Orvets ND, Aleem AW, Keener JD, Calfee RP, Nixon DC, et al. Correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores with legacy patient-reported outcome scores in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(6S):S17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.023.CrossRefPubMed

69.

Patel AA, Dodwad S-NM, Boody BS, Bhatt S, Savage JW, Hsu WK, et al. Validation of Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive tests (CATs) in the surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 2018;43(21):1521–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002648.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Nixon DC, Cusworth BM, McCormick JJ, Johnson JE, Klein SE. Patient-reported allergies do not predict poorer PROMIS function, pain, and depression scores following foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(8):949–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718769667.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Meredith SJ, Nadarajah V, Jauregui JJ, Smuda MP, Medina SH, Bennett CH, et al. Preoperative opioid use in knee surgery patients. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(7):630–6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1666868.CrossRefPubMed

72.

Medina SH, Nadarajah V, Jauregui JJ, Smuda MP, Foster M, Meredith SJ, et al. Orthopaedic surgery patients who use recreational marijuana have less pre-operative pain. Int Orthop. 2019;43(2):283–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4101-x.CrossRefPubMed

73.

Kootstra TJM, Wilkens SC, Menendez ME, Ring D. Is physician empathy associated with differences in pain and functional limitations after a hand surgeon visit? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Apr;476(4):801–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999.0000000000000077.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

74.

Kohring JM, Pelt CE, Anderson MB, Peters CL, Gililland JM. Press Ganey Outpatient Medical Practice Survey scores do not correlate with patient-reported outcomes after primary joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(8):2417–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.044.CrossRefPubMed

75.

Kohring JM, Erickson JA, Anderson MB, Gililland JM, Peters CL, Pelt CE. Treated versus untreated depression in total joint arthroplasty impacts outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(7S):S81–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.065.CrossRefPubMed

76.

Kleimeyer JP, Cheng I, Alamin TF, Hu SS, Cha T, Yanamadala V, et al. Selective anterior lumbar interbody fusion for low back pain associated with degenerative disc disease versus nonsurgical management. Spine. 2018;43(19):1372–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002630.CrossRefPubMed

77.

Khechen B, Haws BE, Patel DV, Bawa MS, Elboghdady IM, Lamoutte EH, et al. PROMIS physical function score strongly correlates with legacy outcome measures in minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy. Spine. 2019;44(6):442–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002841.CrossRefPubMed

78.

Karns MR, Jones DL, Todd DC, Maak TG, Aoki SK, Burks RT, et al. Patient- and procedure-specific variables driving total direct costs of outpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(8):2325967118788543. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118788543.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

79.

Kagan R, Anderson MB, Christensen JC, Peters CL, Gililland JM, Pelt CE. The recovery curve for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system patient-reported physical function and pain interference computerized adaptive tests after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(8):2471–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.020.CrossRefPubMed

80.

Kadri O, Jildeh TR, Meldau JE, Blanchett J, Borowsky P, Muh S, et al. How long does it take for patients to complete PROMIS scores?: an assessment of PROMIS CAT Questionnaires administered at an ambulatory sports medicine clinic. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(8):2325967118791180. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118791180.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

81.

Hung M, Saltzman CL, Voss MW, Bounsanga J, Kendall R, Spiker R, et al. Responsiveness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) instruments in patients with spinal disorders. Spine J. 2019;19(1):34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.06.355.CrossRefPubMed

82.

Hung M, Saltzman CL, Kendall R, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Lawrence B, et al. What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI instruments among patients with spinal conditions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(10):2027–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000419.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

83.

Hung M, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Saltzman CL. Establishing minimum clinically important difference values for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction in orthopaedics. World J Orthop. 2018;9(3):41–9. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

84.

Hung M, Baumhauer JF, Licari FW, Voss MW, Bounsanga J, Saltzman CL. PROMIS and FAAM minimal clinically important differences in foot and ankle orthopedics. Foot Ankle Int [Internet]. 2019;40(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718800304.CrossRefPubMed

85.

Hung M, Baumhauer JF, Licari FW, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Saltzman CL. Responsiveness of the PROMIS and FAAM instruments in foot and ankle orthopedic population. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(1):56–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718799758.CrossRefPubMed

86.

Haws BE, Khechen B, Guntin JA, Cardinal KL, Bohl DD, Singh K. Validity of PROMIS in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary evaluation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;29(1):28–33. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.11.SPINE17989.CrossRefPubMed

87.

Hancock KJ, Glass N, Anthony CA, Wolf BR, Hettrich CM, Albright J, et al. PROMIS: a valid and efficient outcomes instrument for patients with ACL tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(1):100–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5034-z.CrossRefPubMed

88.

Gausden EB, Levack AE, Sin DN, Nwachukwu BU, Fabricant PD, Nellestein AM, et al. Validating the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerized adaptive tests for upper extremity fracture care. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(7):1191–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.014.CrossRefPubMed

89.

Gausden EB, Levack A, Nwachukwu BU, Sin D, Wellman DS, Lorich DG. Computerized adaptive testing for patient reported outcomes in ankle fracture surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(10):1192–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718782487.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

90.

Fram B, Wall LB, Gelberman RH, Goldfarb CA. Surgical transposition for chronic instability of the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018;43(9):925–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193418773036.CrossRefPubMed

91.

Crijns TJ, Bernstein DN, Ring D, Gonzalez R, Wilbur D, Hammert WC. Factors associated with a discretionary upper-extremity surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2019;44(2):155.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.04.028.CrossRef

92.

Chen RE, Papuga MO, Voloshin I, Nicandri GT, Goldblatt JP, Bronstein RD, et al. Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative outcomes after primary ACL reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(5):2325967118771286. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118771286.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

93.

Cavallero M, Rosales R, Caballero J, Virkus WW, Kempton LB, Gaski GE. Locking plate fixation in a series of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures raises treatment costs without clinical benefit. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(7):333–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001188.CrossRefPubMed

94.

Bhatt S, Boody BS, Savage JW, Hsu WK, Rothrock NE, Patel AA. Validation of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system computer adaptive tests in lumbar disk herniation surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(3):95–103. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

95.

Bernstein DN, Kelly M, Houck JR, Ketz JP, Flemister AS, DiGiovanni BF, et al. PROMIS pain interference is superior vs numeric pain rating scale for pain assessment in foot and ankle patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(2):139–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718803314.CrossRefPubMed

96.

Bernholt D, Wright RW, Matava MJ, Brophy RH, Bogunovic L, Smith MV. Patient reported outcomes measurement information system scores are responsive to early changes in patient outcomes following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(4):1113–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.047.CrossRefPubMed

97.

Beleckas CM, Prather H, Guattery J, Wright M, Kelly M, Calfee RP. Anxiety in the orthopedic patient: using PROMIS to assess mental health. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(9):2275–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1867-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

98.

Beleckas CM, Guattery J, Chamberlain AM, Khan T, Kelly MP, Calfee RP. Using Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures to understand the relationship between improvement in physical function and depressive symptoms. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(24):e511–8. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00039.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

99.

Austin DC, Torchia MT, Moschetti WE, Jevsevar DS, Keeney BJ. Patient outcomes after total knee arthroplasty in patients older than 80 years. J Arthroplasty [Internet]. 2018;33(11):3465–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.012.CrossRefPubMed

100.

Anderson MR, Houck JR, Saltzman CL, Hung M, Nickisch F, Barg A, et al. Validation and generalizability of preoperative PROMIS scores to predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(7):763–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718765225.CrossRefPubMed

101.

Anderson MR, Baumhauer JF, DiGiovanni BF, Flemister S, Ketz JP, Oh I, et al. Determining success or failure after foot and ankle surgery using Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS). Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(8):894–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718769666.CrossRefPubMed

102.

Alvarez-Nebreda ML, Heng M, Rosner B, McTague M, Javedan H, Harris MB, et al. Reliability of proxy-reported Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information system physical function and pain interference responses for elderly patients with musculoskeletal injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(4):e156–65. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00644.CrossRefPubMed

103.

Overbeek CL, Nota SPFT, Jayakumar P, Hageman MG, Ring D. The PROMIS physical function correlates with the QuickDASH in patients with upper extremity illness. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(1):311–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3840-2.CrossRefPubMed

104.

Wagner LI, Schink J, Bass M, Patel S, Diaz MV, Rothrock N, et al. Bringing PROMIS to practice: brief and precise symptom screening in ambulatory cancer care. Cancer. 2015;121(6):927–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29104.CrossRefPubMed

105.

Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

106.

Fidai MS, Saltzman BM, Meta F, Lizzio VA, Stephens JP, Bozic KJ, et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and legacy patient-reported outcome measures in the field of orthopaedics: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2018;34:605–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.07.030.CrossRefPubMed

107.

Brodke DS, Goz V, Voss MW, Lawrence BD, Spiker WR, Hung M. PROMIS PF CAT outperforms the ODI and SF-36 physical function domain in spine patients. Spine. 2017;42(12):921–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001965.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

108.

O’Hara NN, Richards JT, Overmann A, Slobogean GP, Klazinga NS. Is PROMIS the new standard for patient-reported outcomes measures in orthopaedic trauma research? Injury [Internet]; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.076.CrossRef

109.

Shalhoub H, Reaney M. PROMIS® tools as endpoints in clinical trials: what should you know? A review of PROMIS® capabilities and the current regulatory space. Int J Clin Trials. 2016;3(4):174–9 Available from: http://www.ijclinicaltrials.com/index.php/ijct/article/view/146. [cited 2020 Jun 17].CrossRef

110.

Pennestrì F, Lippi G, Banfi G. Pay less and spend more-the real value in healthcare procurement. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(22):688. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.10.93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

111.

Makhni EC, Padaki AS, Petridis PD, Steinhaus ME, Ahmad CS, Cole BJ, et al. High variability in outcome reporting patterns in high-impact ACL literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am [Internet]. 2015;97(18):1529–42. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.O.00155.CrossRefPubMed

112.

Galeoto G, Piepoli V, Ciccone E, Mollica R, Federici C, Magnifica F, et al. Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire: translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version (MSK-HQ-I). Muscles Ligaments Tendons J (MLTJ). 2019;9(2). https://doi.org/10.32098/mltj.02.2019.20.

Title: Reporting and utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) measures in orthopedic research and practice: a systematic review
Authors: Maggie E. Horn
Emily K. Reinke
Logan J. Couce
Bryce B. Reeve
Leila Ledbetter
Steven Z. George
Publication date: 01-12-2020
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1749-799X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02068-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Reporting and utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) measures in orthopedic research and practice: a systematic review

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Accuracy and safety of C2 pedicle or pars screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Correction to: Treatment comparison of femoral shaft with femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis

Can nasal Staphylococcus aureus screening and decolonization prior to elective total joint arthroplasty reduce surgical site and prosthesis-related infections? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Outpatient total knee arthroplasty leads to a higher number of complications: a meta-analysis

BM-MSCs differentiated to chondrocytes for treatment of full-thickness cartilage defect of the knee

Three-dimensional morphological analysis of the femoral neck torsion angle—an anatomical study