Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2020

01-06-2020 | Original Scientific Report

Report of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Postoperative Complications by Using a Surgical Risk Calculator in a Cohort of General Surgery Patients

Authors: Elisa M. Müller, Eva Herrmann, Thomas Schmandra, Thomas F. Weigel, Ernst Hanisch, Alexander Buia

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The study investigates whether postoperative complications in elective surgery can be reduced by using a risk calculator via raising the awareness of the surgeon in a preoperative briefing. Postoperative complications like wound infections or pneumonia result in a high burden for healthcare systems. Multiple quality improvement programs address this problem like the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator® (SRC).

Methods

To determine whether the preoperative usage of the SRC could reduce inpatient postoperative complications, two groups of 832 patients each were compared using propensity score matching. The SRC was employed retrospectively in the period 2012/2013 in one group (“Retro”) and prospectively in the other group (“Prosp”) in the period 2014/2015. Actual inpatient postoperative complications were classified by SRC complication categories and compared with the Clavien–Dindo complication classification system (Dindo et al. in Ann Surg 240:205–213, 2004).

Results

Comparing SRC “serious complication” and SRC “any complication,” a nonsignificant increase in the “Prosp”-group was apparent (serious complication: 6.6% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.164; any complication: 8.5% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.444).

Conclusion

Use of the SRC neither reduces inpatient postoperative complications nor the severity of complications. The calculations of the SRC rely on a 30-day postoperative follow-up. Poor sensitivity and medium specificity of the SRC showed that the SRC could not make accurate predictions in a short follow-up time averaging 6 days. Alternatively, since the observed complication rate was low in our study, in an environment of already highly implemented risk management tools, reductions in complications are not easily achieved.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. www.thelancet.com. 372:139 Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD et al (2008) An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. www.​thelancet.​com. 372:139
2.
go back to reference Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G et al (2016) Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012. Bull World Health Organ 94:201–209FCrossRef Weiser TG, Haynes AB, Molina G et al (2016) Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012. Bull World Health Organ 94:201–209FCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pearse RM, Clavien PA, Demartines N et al (2016) Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth 117:601–609CrossRef Pearse RM, Clavien PA, Demartines N et al (2016) Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth 117:601–609CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Haugen AS, Søfteland E, Almeland SK et al (2015) Effect of the World Health Organization checklist on patient outcomes: a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 261:821–828CrossRef Haugen AS, Søfteland E, Almeland SK et al (2015) Effect of the World Health Organization checklist on patient outcomes: a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 261:821–828CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Treadwell JR, Lucas S, Tsou AY (2014) Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation. BMJ Qual Saf 23:299–318CrossRef Treadwell JR, Lucas S, Tsou AY (2014) Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation. BMJ Qual Saf 23:299–318CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Howell AM, Panesar SS, Burns EM et al (2014) Reducing the burden of surgical harm: a systematic review of the interventions used to reduce adverse events in surgery. Ann Surg 259:630–641CrossRef Howell AM, Panesar SS, Burns EM et al (2014) Reducing the burden of surgical harm: a systematic review of the interventions used to reduce adverse events in surgery. Ann Surg 259:630–641CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y et al (2010) Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA 304:1693CrossRef Neily J, Mills PD, Young-Xu Y et al (2010) Association between implementation of a medical team training program and surgical mortality. JAMA 304:1693CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nundy S, Mukherjee A, Sexton JB et al (2008) Impact of preoperative briefings on operating room delays. Arch Surg 143:1068CrossRef Nundy S, Mukherjee A, Sexton JB et al (2008) Impact of preoperative briefings on operating room delays. Arch Surg 143:1068CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Salas E, Frush K (2012) Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training. In: Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training, 1st ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 170 Salas E, Frush K (2012) Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training. In: Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training, 1st ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 170
10.
go back to reference Sacks GD, Dawes AJ, Ettner SL et al (2016) Surgeon perception of risk and benefit in the decision to operate. Ann Surg 264:896–903CrossRef Sacks GD, Dawes AJ, Ettner SL et al (2016) Surgeon perception of risk and benefit in the decision to operate. Ann Surg 264:896–903CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 217:833–842.e3CrossRef Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 217:833–842.e3CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vogel P, Vogel DHV (2019) Cognition errors in the treatment course of patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal resection. BMC 6:1–10 Vogel P, Vogel DHV (2019) Cognition errors in the treatment course of patients with anastomotic failure after colorectal resection. BMC 6:1–10
13.
go back to reference Hull L, Arora S, Aggarwal R et al (2012) The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 214:214–230CrossRef Hull L, Arora S, Aggarwal R et al (2012) The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 214:214–230CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D et al (2016) SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process Table 1 Revised Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0) publication guidelines. J Contin Educ Nursing, J Am Coll Surg 25:986–992 Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D et al (2016) SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process Table 1 Revised Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0) publication guidelines. J Contin Educ Nursing, J Am Coll Surg 25:986–992
15.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vanhaecht K, Ovretveit J, Elliott MJ et al (2012) Have we drawn the wrong conclusions about the value of care pathways? Is a cochrane review appropriate? Eval. Heal. Prof. 35:28–42CrossRef Vanhaecht K, Ovretveit J, Elliott MJ et al (2012) Have we drawn the wrong conclusions about the value of care pathways? Is a cochrane review appropriate? Eval. Heal. Prof. 35:28–42CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tevis S (2014) Implications of multiple complications on post-operative recovery in general surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 219:e36CrossRef Tevis S (2014) Implications of multiple complications on post-operative recovery in general surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 219:e36CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schneider EC, Sarnak DO, Squires D et al (2017) Mirror, Mirror 2017: international comparison reflects flaws and opportunities for better U.S. Health Care Schneider EC, Sarnak DO, Squires D et al (2017) Mirror, Mirror 2017: international comparison reflects flaws and opportunities for better U.S. Health Care
19.
go back to reference Sacks GD, Dawes AJ, Ettner SL et al (2016) Impact of a risk calculator on risk perception and surgical decision making: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 264:889–895CrossRef Sacks GD, Dawes AJ, Ettner SL et al (2016) Impact of a risk calculator on risk perception and surgical decision making: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 264:889–895CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Hawn MT, Hosokawa PW et al (2014) Comparison of prospective risk estimates for postoperative complications: human versus computer model. J Am Coll Surg 218:237–245CrossRef Glasgow RE, Hawn MT, Hosokawa PW et al (2014) Comparison of prospective risk estimates for postoperative complications: human versus computer model. J Am Coll Surg 218:237–245CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Markus PM, Martell J, Leister I et al (2005) Predicting postoperative morbidity by clinical assessment. Br J Surg 92:101–106CrossRef Markus PM, Martell J, Leister I et al (2005) Predicting postoperative morbidity by clinical assessment. Br J Surg 92:101–106CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Thompson JS, Baxter BT, Allison JG et al (2003) Temporal patterns of postoperative complications. Arch Surg 138:596–603CrossRef Thompson JS, Baxter BT, Allison JG et al (2003) Temporal patterns of postoperative complications. Arch Surg 138:596–603CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lonjon G, Porcher R, Ergina P et al (2017) Potential pitfalls of reporting and bias in observational studies with propensity score analysis assessing a surgical procedure. Ann Surg 265:901–909CrossRef Lonjon G, Porcher R, Ergina P et al (2017) Potential pitfalls of reporting and bias in observational studies with propensity score analysis assessing a surgical procedure. Ann Surg 265:901–909CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lonjon G, Boutron I, Trinquart L et al (2014) Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures. Ann Surg 259:18–25CrossRef Lonjon G, Boutron I, Trinquart L et al (2014) Comparison of treatment effect estimates from prospective nonrandomized studies with propensity score analysis and randomized controlled trials of surgical procedures. Ann Surg 259:18–25CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Weigel TF, Hanisch E, Hanisch A et al (2019) Power of judgment: the significance of Kant’s philosophy for the medical system today. J Surg Educ 76:4–8CrossRef Weigel TF, Hanisch E, Hanisch A et al (2019) Power of judgment: the significance of Kant’s philosophy for the medical system today. J Surg Educ 76:4–8CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Report of a Quality Improvement Program for Reducing Postoperative Complications by Using a Surgical Risk Calculator in a Cohort of General Surgery Patients
Authors
Elisa M. Müller
Eva Herrmann
Thomas Schmandra
Thomas F. Weigel
Ernst Hanisch
Alexander Buia
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05393-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

World Journal of Surgery 6/2020 Go to the issue