Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2013

01-01-2013 | Reply to Letter to the Editor

Reply to Letter to the Editor: Efficacy and Degree of Bias in Knee Injury Prevention Studies: A Systematic Review of RCTs

Authors: Nathan L. Grimm, BS, Kevin G. Shea, MD, Ryan W. Leaver, DPT, Stephen K. Aoki, MD, James L. Carey, MD, MPH

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Excerpt

We appreciate the thoughtful comments of Dr. Berger regarding our recent publication [1]. He focused on the following methodologic points: randomization methods, concealment of allocations, and masking (blinding). Overall, we are in agreement with the position that every action should be taken to minimize susceptibility to bias by using the most appropriate methods for conducting randomized controlled trials. …
Literature
1.
Grimm NL, Shea KG, Leaver RW, Aoki SK, Carey JL. Efficacy and degree of bias in knee injury prevention studies: a systematic review of RCTs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Sep 8. [Epub ahead of print]
2.
Brushoj C, Larsen K, Albrecht-Beste E, Nielsen MB, Løye F, Hölmich P. Prevention of overuse injuries by a concurrent exercise program in subjects exposed to an increase in training load: a randomized controlled trial of 1020 army recruits. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:663–670.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reply to Letter to the Editor: Efficacy and Degree of Bias in Knee Injury Prevention Studies: A Systematic Review of RCTs
Authors
Nathan L. Grimm, BS
Kevin G. Shea, MD
Ryan W. Leaver, DPT
Stephen K. Aoki, MD
James L. Carey, MD, MPH
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2676-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2013 Go to the issue

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society

Failure of Irrigation and Débridement for Early Postoperative Periprosthetic Infection

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society

Predictors of Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Manipulation After TKA

Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Knee Society

The ACL in the Arthritic Knee: How Often Is It Present and Can Preoperative Tests Predict Its Presence?

Clinical Research

Poor Long-term Clinical Results of Saddle Prosthesis After Resection of Periacetabular Tumors

Clinical Research

Is the Damage of Cartilage a Global or Localized Phenomenon in Hip Dysplasia, Measured by dGEMRIC?

Survey

Efficacy and Degree of Bias in Knee Injury Prevention Studies: A Systematic Review of RCTs