Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Author’s Reply

Reply to correspondence by Smart and Watson

Author: C. Ratto

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

We appreciate the interest shown by Smart and Watson [1] in our article published in Techniques in Coloproctology [2]. Their remarks open a complex debate on the “applicability” of a new specialist technique to the “average” colorectal surgeon. The authors of the letter are skeptical about the ability of the average colorectal specialist to perform an operation for hemorrhoidal disease [e.g., transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD)] with less than a 10% recurrence rate in the medium term. Our 9.5% recurrence rate at 44 ± 29 months mean follow-up should be considered as a realistic percentage of failure when applied to a patient population such as the one in our study. We have been transparent in our patient selection process and treatment algorithms in our study published in Techniques in Coloproctology [2] and more so than many centers that either perform only THD or that perform rubber band ligation (RBL) as a first intervention. Whatever the amount of specialization within “general” surgery toward coloproctology, similar results should be obtainable given adequate training and support. In our institution, we have tried to optimize and standardize the THD procedure as much as possible over a long period of time. We have been able to share our experience through presentations, hands-on courses and publications, including this one published in Techniques in Coloproctology. Sharing this past experience should be regarded as an attempt to help others to achieve the same results as our center rather than be criticized as “excessive self-citations.” We paid a lot of attention to the failure rate and reasons for failures and adapted our technique accordingly, for instance modifying the dearterialization, from proximal to distal, and optimizing the mucopexy technique, reducing recurrence rates. We would hope that Smart and Watson would want to share improvements in technique in a similar way for operations that they have a special interest in, and not deter the surgeon approaching an operation from performing the procedure correctly and achieving similarly good results. …
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ratto C, Campennì P, Papeo F, Donisi L, Litta F, Parello A (2017) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for hemorrhoidal disease: a single-center study on 1000 consecutive cases and a review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol 21(12):953–962CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ratto C, Campennì P, Papeo F, Donisi L, Litta F, Parello A (2017) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for hemorrhoidal disease: a single-center study on 1000 consecutive cases and a review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol 21(12):953–962CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Aigner F, Kronberger I, Oberwalder M et al (2016) Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation with suture mucopexy compared with suture mucopexy alone for the treatment of Grade III haemorrhoids: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 18(7):710–716CrossRefPubMed Aigner F, Kronberger I, Oberwalder M et al (2016) Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation with suture mucopexy compared with suture mucopexy alone for the treatment of Grade III haemorrhoids: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 18(7):710–716CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lehur PA, Didnée AS, Faucheron JL et al (2016) Cost-effectiveness of new surgical treatments for hemorrhoidal disease: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing transanal Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy and circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Ann Surg 264(5):710–716CrossRefPubMed Lehur PA, Didnée AS, Faucheron JL et al (2016) Cost-effectiveness of new surgical treatments for hemorrhoidal disease: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing transanal Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy and circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Ann Surg 264(5):710–716CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Brown SR, Tiernan JP, Watson AJM et al (2016) Haemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree haemorrhoids (HubBLe): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388(10042):356–364 (Erratum in: Lancet. 23;388(10042):342) Brown SR, Tiernan JP, Watson AJM et al (2016) Haemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree haemorrhoids (HubBLe): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388(10042):356–364 (Erratum in: Lancet. 23;388(10042):342)
6.
go back to reference Ratto C (2017) Hemorrhoids and the recurrent attempts to destroy them. Tech Coloproctol 21(1):69–71CrossRefPubMed Ratto C (2017) Hemorrhoids and the recurrent attempts to destroy them. Tech Coloproctol 21(1):69–71CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reply to correspondence by Smart and Watson
Author
C. Ratto
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1763-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Techniques in Coloproctology 3/2018 Go to the issue