Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 10/2010

01-10-2010

Reply: Prognostic Significance of Host- and Tumor-related Factors in Patients with Gastric Cancer

Authors: Yasuhiko Mohri, Chikao Miki

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 10/2010

Login to get access

Excerpt

We find Hottenrott’s letter [1] most interesting as he states that lymph node status was one of the prognostic factors in previous reports on gastric cancer. Preoperative lymph node status in the present study was evaluated by endoscopic ultrasonography and computed tomography. The performance found was similar to that of prior studies, in which results ranged from 67 to 90% [2, 3]. The rates of accuracy for depth of tumor and lymph node status in our study were 78 and 71%, respectively. The N/L ratio has been shown to have an independent prognostic value in a variety of cancers, including lung, colorectal, pancreatic, and ovarian cancers and cholangiocarcinomas. Although ours was a retrospective study, our prognostic model is expected to predict cancer-related prognosis of gastric cancer. We will validate how this prognostic model is useful for large prospective studies. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hottenrott C, Katsios C (2010) Prognostic significance of host- and tumor-related factors in patients with gastric cancer. World J Surg. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0554-9 [Epub ahead of print] Hottenrott C, Katsios C (2010) Prognostic significance of host- and tumor-related factors in patients with gastric cancer. World J Surg. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-010-0554-9 [Epub ahead of print]
2.
go back to reference Habermann CR, Weiss F, Riecken R et al (2004) Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology 230:465–471CrossRefPubMed Habermann CR, Weiss F, Riecken R et al (2004) Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology 230:465–471CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Polkowski M, Palucki J, Wronska E et al (2004) Endosonography versus helical computed tomography for locoregional staging of gastric cancer. Endoscopy 36:617–623CrossRefPubMed Polkowski M, Palucki J, Wronska E et al (2004) Endosonography versus helical computed tomography for locoregional staging of gastric cancer. Endoscopy 36:617–623CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gotoda T (2006) Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: the Japanese perspective. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 22:561–569CrossRefPubMed Gotoda T (2006) Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: the Japanese perspective. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 22:561–569CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Winter K, Okawara GS et al (2006) Phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiation in patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma (RTOG 9904): quality of combined modality therapy and pathologic response. J Clin Oncol 24:3953–3958CrossRefPubMed Ajani JA, Winter K, Okawara GS et al (2006) Phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiation in patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma (RTOG 9904): quality of combined modality therapy and pathologic response. J Clin Oncol 24:3953–3958CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mohri Y, Mohri T, Wei W et al (2009) Identification of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and human neutrophil peptide 1–3 as potential biomarkers for gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 101:295–302CrossRefPubMed Mohri Y, Mohri T, Wei W et al (2009) Identification of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and human neutrophil peptide 1–3 as potential biomarkers for gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 101:295–302CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reply: Prognostic Significance of Host- and Tumor-related Factors in Patients with Gastric Cancer
Authors
Yasuhiko Mohri
Chikao Miki
Publication date
01-10-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 10/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0674-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2010

World Journal of Surgery 10/2010 Go to the issue