Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 2/2013

01-03-2013 | Original Article

Repair of dental resin-based composites

Authors: Veronika Baur, Nicoleta Ilie

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The study analyzed the reparability and compatibility of light-curing resin-based composites (RBCs) of the categories “microhybrid,” “nanohybrid,” and “packable.”

Materials and methods

Six RBCs with different matrix and filler formulation—purely methacrylate-based composites (MBCs), ormocer-based composites (OBCs), and silorane-based composites (SBCs)—were used for the specimens. Every material was combined with itself and with the other five RBCs, resulting in a total of 36 combination groups (n = 20). The specimens were polymerized, aged for 8 weeks in distilled water at 37 °C, and then repaired by means of a repair kit. Shear bond strength and fracture mode were measured after aging of the specimens, undergoing storage for 24 h in distilled water at 37 °C followed by thermocycling (5,000 cycles, 5–55 °C) and an additional 4-week storage in distilled water at 37 °C.

Results

Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA with TUKEY HSD post hoc test (α = 0.05). On average, the OBC Admira reached the highest value as a substrate material (30.41 MPa), and the SBC Filtek Silorane reached the lowest value (8.14 MPa). Filtek Silorane was identified as the repair material with the highest bond strength value (28.70 MPa), while a packable composite reached the lowest bond strength value (15.55 MPa). The analysis of the break modes showed that adhesive breaks are typical when strength is at its lowest (6.27 MPa). A large number of cohesive fractures are conspicuous when identical materials are used for repair, except Filtek Silorane (2 % cohesive fractures).

Conclusions

The study demonstrated that the effect of the different materials on bond strength varies strongly, depending on whether the material is used as filling or as repair material.

Clinical relevance

It is generally advisable but not compulsory to combine identical RBCs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Krejci I, Lieber CM, Lutz F (1995) Time required to remove totally bonded tooth-colored posterior restorations and related tooth structure loss. Dent Mater 11:34–40PubMedCrossRef Krejci I, Lieber CM, Lutz F (1995) Time required to remove totally bonded tooth-colored posterior restorations and related tooth structure loss. Dent Mater 11:34–40PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutsein R (1997) Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent 77:122–126PubMedCrossRef Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutsein R (1997) Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent 77:122–126PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Magni E, Ferrari M, Papacchini F, Hickel R, Ilie N (2009) Influence of ozone on the composite-to composite bond. Clin Oral Invest 15:249–256CrossRef Magni E, Ferrari M, Papacchini F, Hickel R, Ilie N (2009) Influence of ozone on the composite-to composite bond. Clin Oral Invest 15:249–256CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Özcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GAP, Bottino MA (2007) Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater 23:1276–1282PubMedCrossRef Özcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Galhano GAP, Bottino MA (2007) Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater 23:1276–1282PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Papacchini F, Magni E, Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Polimeni A, Ferrari M (2007) Effect of intermediate agents and pre-heating of repairing resin on composite-repair bonds. Oper Dent 32–4:363–371CrossRef Papacchini F, Magni E, Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Polimeni A, Ferrari M (2007) Effect of intermediate agents and pre-heating of repairing resin on composite-repair bonds. Oper Dent 32–4:363–371CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B (2008) Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Invest 13:317–323CrossRef Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B (2008) Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Invest 13:317–323CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rinastiti M, Özcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ (2012) Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strength of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins. Clin Oral Invest (in press) Rinastiti M, Özcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ (2012) Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strength of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins. Clin Oral Invest (in press)
8.
go back to reference Yesilyurt C, Kusgoz A, Bayram M, Ulker M (2009) Initial repair bond strength of a nano-filled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatments and bonding agents. J Esthet Restor Dent 21:261CrossRef Yesilyurt C, Kusgoz A, Bayram M, Ulker M (2009) Initial repair bond strength of a nano-filled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatments and bonding agents. J Esthet Restor Dent 21:261CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ivanovas S, Hickel R, Ilie N (2011) How to repair fillings made by silorane-based composites. Clin Oral Ivest 15:915–22CrossRef Ivanovas S, Hickel R, Ilie N (2011) How to repair fillings made by silorane-based composites. Clin Oral Ivest 15:915–22CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK (2003) Composite-composite repair bond stregth: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent 31:521–525PubMedCrossRef Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK (2003) Composite-composite repair bond stregth: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent 31:521–525PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hahnel S, Heinrich A, Bürgers R, Handel G, Rosentritt M (2010) Investigation of mechanical properties of modern dental composites after artificial aging for one year. Oper Dent 35–4:412–419CrossRef Hahnel S, Heinrich A, Bürgers R, Handel G, Rosentritt M (2010) Investigation of mechanical properties of modern dental composites after artificial aging for one year. Oper Dent 35–4:412–419CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lührs A, Görmann B, Jacker-Guhr S, Guertsen W (2011) Repairability of dental siloranes in vitro. Dental Mater 27:144–149CrossRef Lührs A, Görmann B, Jacker-Guhr S, Guertsen W (2011) Repairability of dental siloranes in vitro. Dental Mater 27:144–149CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sideridou T, Achilias DS, Kyrikou E (2004) Thermal expansion characteristics of light-cured dental resins and resin composites. Biomaterials 25:3087–3097PubMedCrossRef Sideridou T, Achilias DS, Kyrikou E (2004) Thermal expansion characteristics of light-cured dental resins and resin composites. Biomaterials 25:3087–3097PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Curtis AR, Shortall AC, Marquis PM, Palin WM (2008) Water uptake and strength characteristics of a nano-filled resin-based composite. J Dent 36:186–193PubMedCrossRef Curtis AR, Shortall AC, Marquis PM, Palin WM (2008) Water uptake and strength characteristics of a nano-filled resin-based composite. J Dent 36:186–193PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ilie N, Hickel R (2009) Macro-, micro- and nao-mechanical investigations on silorane and methacrylate-based composites. Dent Mater 25:810–819PubMedCrossRef Ilie N, Hickel R (2009) Macro-, micro- and nao-mechanical investigations on silorane and methacrylate-based composites. Dent Mater 25:810–819PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mjör IA (1993) Repair versus replacement of failed restorations. Int Dent J 43:466–472PubMed Mjör IA (1993) Repair versus replacement of failed restorations. Int Dent J 43:466–472PubMed
17.
go back to reference Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK (2008) Incremental layers bonding of silorane composite: the initial bonding properties. J Dent 36:560–563PubMedCrossRef Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK (2008) Incremental layers bonding of silorane composite: the initial bonding properties. J Dent 36:560–563PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Brendeke J, Ozcan M (2007) Effect of physicochemical aging conditions on the composite-composite repair bond strength. J Adhes Dent 9:399–406PubMed Brendeke J, Ozcan M (2007) Effect of physicochemical aging conditions on the composite-composite repair bond strength. J Adhes Dent 9:399–406PubMed
19.
go back to reference Maneenut C, Sakoolnamarka R, Tyas MJ (2010) The repair potential of resin composite materials. Dent Mater 27:e20–e27PubMedCrossRef Maneenut C, Sakoolnamarka R, Tyas MJ (2010) The repair potential of resin composite materials. Dent Mater 27:e20–e27PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Puckett AD, Holder R, O'Hara JW (1991) Strength of posterior composite repairs using different composite/bonding agent combinations. Oper Dent 16:136–140PubMed Puckett AD, Holder R, O'Hara JW (1991) Strength of posterior composite repairs using different composite/bonding agent combinations. Oper Dent 16:136–140PubMed
21.
go back to reference Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R (2005) Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater 21:68–74PubMedCrossRef Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R (2005) Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater 21:68–74PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Burke FJ, Marquis PM, Randall RC (2005) The influence of short and medium-term water immersion on the hydrolytic stability of novel low-shrink dental composites. Dent Mater 21:852–863PubMedCrossRef Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Burke FJ, Marquis PM, Randall RC (2005) The influence of short and medium-term water immersion on the hydrolytic stability of novel low-shrink dental composites. Dent Mater 21:852–863PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ilie N, Hickel R (2009) Investigations on mechanical behavior of dental composites. Clin Oral Invest 13:427–438CrossRef Ilie N, Hickel R (2009) Investigations on mechanical behavior of dental composites. Clin Oral Invest 13:427–438CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tagtekin DA, Yanikoglu CF, Bozkurt FO, Kologlu B, Sur H (2004) Selected characteristics of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite. Dent Mater 20:487–497PubMedCrossRef Tagtekin DA, Yanikoglu CF, Bozkurt FO, Kologlu B, Sur H (2004) Selected characteristics of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite. Dent Mater 20:487–497PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Loomans BAC, Vivan Cardoso M, Roeters FJM, Opdam NJM, De Munck J, Huysmans MCDNJM, Van Meerbeek B (2011) Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater 27:701–709PubMedCrossRef Loomans BAC, Vivan Cardoso M, Roeters FJM, Opdam NJM, De Munck J, Huysmans MCDNJM, Van Meerbeek B (2011) Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater 27:701–709PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Oilo G (1993) Bond strength testing–what does it mean? Int Dent J 43:492–498PubMed Oilo G (1993) Bond strength testing–what does it mean? Int Dent J 43:492–498PubMed
27.
go back to reference Boaro LC, Goncalves F, Guimarães TC, Ferracane JL, Versluis A, Braga RR (2010) Polymerization stress, shrinkage and elastic modulus of current low-shrinkage restorative composites. Dent Mater 26:1144–1150PubMedCrossRef Boaro LC, Goncalves F, Guimarães TC, Ferracane JL, Versluis A, Braga RR (2010) Polymerization stress, shrinkage and elastic modulus of current low-shrinkage restorative composites. Dent Mater 26:1144–1150PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Repair of dental resin-based composites
Authors
Veronika Baur
Nicoleta Ilie
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0722-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Clinical Oral Investigations 2/2013 Go to the issue