Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 3/2016

01-03-2016 | Editorial Commentary

Renal background correction and measurement of split renal function: The challenge

Editorial Comment: EJNM-D-15-00322, M Donald Blaufox, MD, PhD

Author: M. Donald Blaufox

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

One of the sources of error in performing quantitative nuclear medicine studies is correction for the presence of background activity surrounding the area of interest. This problem is particularly difficult to resolve in evaluating the kidney because of its location deep within the body surrounded by other highly vascular organs including the liver and spleen. The difficulty in determining quantitative individual renal function measurements accurately and subtracting the correct background activity was noted in a consensus report from the International Society of Radionuclides and Nephrourology (ISCORN) [1]. They stated that “Background subtraction is particularly critical in some methods, since intra- and extravascular activity is rapidly changing (in opposite directions) during the time when individual function is usually calculated and the contribution of each type of activity varies within different regions of interest”. They also pointed out that renal depth may influence the amount of measured activity through attenuation. Taylor et al. [2] suggested improved formulas for correction of renal depth, but there remains an error from this source, which is fortunately small in most patients. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Blaufox MD, Aureli M, Bubeck B, Fommei E, Piepsz A, Russell C, et al. Report of the Radionuclides in Nephrourology Committee on renal clearance. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1883–90.PubMed Blaufox MD, Aureli M, Bubeck B, Fommei E, Piepsz A, Russell C, et al. Report of the Radionuclides in Nephrourology Committee on renal clearance. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1883–90.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Taylor A, Lewis C, Giacometti A, Hall EC, Barefield KP. Improved formulas for the estimation of renal depth in adults. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1766–9.PubMed Taylor A, Lewis C, Giacometti A, Hall EC, Barefield KP. Improved formulas for the estimation of renal depth in adults. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1766–9.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Prigent A, Cosgriff P, Gates GF, Granerus G, Fine EJ, Itoh K, et al. Consensus report on quality control of quantitative measurements of renal function obtained from the renogram: International Consensus Committee from the Scientific Committee of Radionuclides in Nephrourology. Semin Nucl Med. 1999;29:146–59.PubMedCrossRef Prigent A, Cosgriff P, Gates GF, Granerus G, Fine EJ, Itoh K, et al. Consensus report on quality control of quantitative measurements of renal function obtained from the renogram: International Consensus Committee from the Scientific Committee of Radionuclides in Nephrourology. Semin Nucl Med. 1999;29:146–59.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fine EJ, Michael A, Janet G, Khalid S, Donald Blaufox M. Measurement of effective renal plasma flow: a comparison of methods. J Nucl Med. 1987;28:1393–400.PubMed Fine EJ, Michael A, Janet G, Khalid S, Donald Blaufox M. Measurement of effective renal plasma flow: a comparison of methods. J Nucl Med. 1987;28:1393–400.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Rutland MD. A comprehensive analysis of renal DTPA studies. I. Theory and normal values. Nucl Med Commun. 1985;6:11–20.PubMedCrossRef Rutland MD. A comprehensive analysis of renal DTPA studies. I. Theory and normal values. Nucl Med Commun. 1985;6:11–20.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Piepsz A, Dobbeleir A, Ham HR. Effect of background correction on separate technetium-99m-DTPA renal clearance. J NucI Med. 1990;31:430–5. Piepsz A, Dobbeleir A, Ham HR. Effect of background correction on separate technetium-99m-DTPA renal clearance. J NucI Med. 1990;31:430–5.
7.
go back to reference Wesolowski MJ, Conrad GR, Šámal M, Watson G, Wanasundara SN, Babyn P, et al. A simple method for determining split renal function from dynamic 99mTc-MAG3 scintigraphic data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015. doi:10.1007/s00259-015-3216-1.PubMed Wesolowski MJ, Conrad GR, Šámal M, Watson G, Wanasundara SN, Babyn P, et al. A simple method for determining split renal function from dynamic 99mTc-MAG3 scintigraphic data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-015-3216-1.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Durand E. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with radionuclide methods of evaluating the kidney. Semin Nucl Med. 2014;44:82–92.PubMedCrossRef Durand E. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with radionuclide methods of evaluating the kidney. Semin Nucl Med. 2014;44:82–92.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Renal background correction and measurement of split renal function: The challenge
Editorial Comment: EJNM-D-15-00322, M Donald Blaufox, MD, PhD
Author
M. Donald Blaufox
Publication date
01-03-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3253-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 3/2016 Go to the issue