Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 5/2020

01-10-2020 | Remifentanil | Original Research

Evaluation of Surgical Pleth Index and Analgesia Nociception Index as surrogate pain measures in conscious postoperative patients: an observational study

Authors: Joo-Hyun Lee, Byung-Moon Choi, Yu-Ri Jung, Yong-Hun Lee, Ji-Yeon Bang, Gyu-Jeong Noh

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of the Surgical Plethysmographic Index (SPI) and the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) as surrogate pain measures and determined their respective cut-off values for detecting pain in conscious postoperative patients. In total, 192 patients after elective surgery were enrolled. Baseline SPI and ANI data were acquired for 10 min in the operating room prior to surgery when the patients rated their pain as 0 on the numerical rating scale (NRS). Upon arrival in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) after surgery, SPI and ANI data were recorded for 10 min. The means of the recorded data at OR and PACU were defined as the values representing baseline and postoperative pain, respectively. SPI and ANI data obtained from 189 patients were analysed, who were anesthetized with propofol (n = 149) or sevoflurane (n = 40). Remifentanil was continuously infused intraoperatively in all patients. The values of SPI and ANI were significantly different in conscious patients without (NRS = 0) and with pain (NRS > 0). The areas under the receiver operating curves for SPI and ANI were 0.73 (P < 0.0001) and 0.67 (P < 0.0001), respectively. The cut-off values for SPI and ANI in predicting postoperative pain were 44 (sensitivity: 84%, specificity: 53%) and 63 (sensitivity: 52%, specificity: 82%), respectively, which are different from those suggested by their respective manufacturers for use in intraoperative state under general anaesthesia. The cut-off values of SPI and ANI for detecting pain were similar regardless of the type of anesthesia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gorczyca R, Filip R, Walczak E. Psychological aspects of pain. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;1:23–7. Gorczyca R, Filip R, Walczak E. Psychological aspects of pain. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;1:23–7.
17.
go back to reference Schnider TW, Minto CF, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Shafer SL, Youngs EJ. The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:1170–82.CrossRef Schnider TW, Minto CF, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Shafer SL, Youngs EJ. The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:1170–82.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Youngs EJ. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:1502–16.CrossRef Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Youngs EJ. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:1502–16.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, Youngs E, Lemmens HJ, Gambus PL, Billard V, Hoke JF, Moore KH, Hermann DJ, Muir KT, Mandema JW, Shafer SL. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:10–23.CrossRef Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, Youngs E, Lemmens HJ, Gambus PL, Billard V, Hoke JF, Moore KH, Hermann DJ, Muir KT, Mandema JW, Shafer SL. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:10–23.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Aldrete JA. Modifications to the postanesthesia score for use in ambulatory surgery. J Perianesth Nurs. 1998;13:148–55.CrossRef Aldrete JA. Modifications to the postanesthesia score for use in ambulatory surgery. J Perianesth Nurs. 1998;13:148–55.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Smith WD, Dutton RC, Smith NT. Measuring the performance of anesthetic depth indicators. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:38–51.CrossRef Smith WD, Dutton RC, Smith NT. Measuring the performance of anesthetic depth indicators. Anesthesiology. 1996;84:38–51.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Galletly DC, Buckley DH, Robinson BJ, Corfiatis T. Heart rate variability during propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1994;72:219–20.CrossRef Galletly DC, Buckley DH, Robinson BJ, Corfiatis T. Heart rate variability during propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1994;72:219–20.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 1978;8:283–98.CrossRef Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 1978;8:283–98.CrossRef
34.
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of Surgical Pleth Index and Analgesia Nociception Index as surrogate pain measures in conscious postoperative patients: an observational study
Authors
Joo-Hyun Lee
Byung-Moon Choi
Yu-Ri Jung
Yong-Hun Lee
Ji-Yeon Bang
Gyu-Jeong Noh
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00399-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 5/2020 Go to the issue