Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 3/2011

01-03-2011 | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine

Reliability in arthroscopic grading of cartilage lesions: results of a prospective blinded study for evaluation of inter-observer reliability

Authors: Gunter Spahn, Hans Michael Klinger, Mike Baums, Ulrich Pinkepank, Gunther O. Hofmann

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and aim

Arthroscopy is a well-established method for grading cartilage lesions. This study was undertaken to evaluate the inter-observer variance of grading cartilage lesions in a real life operation.

Materials and methods

Four experienced arthroscopic surgeons used diagnostic arthroscopy, one after the other, to grade cartilage lesions in a total of 16 patients who had undergone knee arthroscopy.

Results

In summary, a total of 14 cartilage areas in 16 patients were graded (n = 224). The Cohens (Fleiss) Kappa Index for multiple investigators was κ = 0.052 in the medial, κ = 0.300 in the central, and κ = 0.107 in the lateral surface of the patella. The indices were κ = 0.292 in the medial, κ = 0.0.255 in the central, and κ = 0.234 in the lateral surface of the trochlea. The inter-observer variance was κ = 0.193 in the MFC mean bearing zone, κ = 0.116 in the margin of the MFC, κ = 0.168 in the mean bearing zone of the TM, and κ = 0.164 in the TM margin. In the lateral compartment, the κ-Index was 0.309 in the LFC mean bearing zone, 0.111 in the margin of the LFC, 0.020 in the mean bearing zone of the TL, and 0.085 in the TL margin.

Conclusions

The inter-observer reliability of the arthroscopic grading of cartilage lesions is poor. The major problem is the relatively large variability in differentiating between intact cartilage and lesions that consist of the softening of the cartilage and the differentiation between superficial and deep cartilage lesions. In the future, objective measurements should be developed to solve this problem.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aroen A, Loken S, Heir S, Alvik E, Ekeland A, Granlund OG, Engebretsen L (2004) Articular cartilage lesions in 993 consecutive knee arthroscopies. Am J Sports Med 32:211–215CrossRefPubMed Aroen A, Loken S, Heir S, Alvik E, Ekeland A, Granlund OG, Engebretsen L (2004) Articular cartilage lesions in 993 consecutive knee arthroscopies. Am J Sports Med 32:211–215CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ayral X, Gueguen A, Ike RW, Bonvarlet JP, Frizziero L, Kalunian K, Moreland LW, Myers S, O’Rourke KS, Roos H, Altman R, Dougados M (1998) Inter-observer reliability of the arthroscopic quantification of chondropathy of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 6:160–166CrossRefPubMed Ayral X, Gueguen A, Ike RW, Bonvarlet JP, Frizziero L, Kalunian K, Moreland LW, Myers S, O’Rourke KS, Roos H, Altman R, Dougados M (1998) Inter-observer reliability of the arthroscopic quantification of chondropathy of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 6:160–166CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bortz J, Lienert GA (2008) Statistics for clinical investigation. Springer, Heidelberg Bortz J, Lienert GA (2008) Statistics for clinical investigation. Springer, Heidelberg
4.
go back to reference Brismar BH, Wredmark T, Movin T, Leandersson J, Svensson O (2002) Observer reliability in the arthroscopic classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:42–47CrossRefPubMed Brismar BH, Wredmark T, Movin T, Leandersson J, Svensson O (2002) Observer reliability in the arthroscopic classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:42–47CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Brittberg M, Winalski CS (2003) Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(2):58–69PubMed Brittberg M, Winalski CS (2003) Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(2):58–69PubMed
6.
go back to reference Cameron ML, Briggs KK, Steadman JR (2003) Reproducibility and reliability of the outerbridge classification for grading chondral lesions of the knee arthroscopically. Am J Sports Med 31:83–86PubMed Cameron ML, Briggs KK, Steadman JR (2003) Reproducibility and reliability of the outerbridge classification for grading chondral lesions of the knee arthroscopically. Am J Sports Med 31:83–86PubMed
7.
go back to reference Curl WW, Krome J, Gordon ES, Rushing J, Smith BP, Poehling GG (1997) Cartilage injuries: a review of 31, 516 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 13:456–460CrossRefPubMed Curl WW, Krome J, Gordon ES, Rushing J, Smith BP, Poehling GG (1997) Cartilage injuries: a review of 31, 516 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 13:456–460CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Dougados M, Ayral X, Listrat V, Gueguen A, Bahuaud J, Beaufils P, Beguin JA, Bonvarlet JP, Boyer T, Coudane H (1994) The SFA system for assessing articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy of the knee. Arthroscopy 10:69–77CrossRefPubMed Dougados M, Ayral X, Listrat V, Gueguen A, Bahuaud J, Beaufils P, Beguin JA, Bonvarlet JP, Boyer T, Coudane H (1994) The SFA system for assessing articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy of the knee. Arthroscopy 10:69–77CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Duda GN, Kleemann RU, Bluecher U, Weiler A (2004) A new device to detect early cartilage degeneration. Am J Sports Med 32:693–698CrossRefPubMed Duda GN, Kleemann RU, Bluecher U, Weiler A (2004) A new device to detect early cartilage degeneration. Am J Sports Med 32:693–698CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hjelle K, Solheim E, Strand T, Muri R, Brittberg M (2002) Articular cartilage defects in 1,000 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 18:730–734CrossRefPubMed Hjelle K, Solheim E, Strand T, Muri R, Brittberg M (2002) Articular cartilage defects in 1,000 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy 18:730–734CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Javed A, Siddique M, Vaghela M, Hui AC (2002) Interobserver variations in intra-articular evaluation during arthroscopy of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:48–49CrossRefPubMed Javed A, Siddique M, Vaghela M, Hui AC (2002) Interobserver variations in intra-articular evaluation during arthroscopy of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:48–49CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jerosch J, Castro WH, de Waal Malefijt MC, Busch M, van Kampen A (1997) Interobserver variation in diagnostic arthroscopy of the knee joint. “How really objective are arthroscopic findings?”. Unfallchirurg 100:782–786CrossRefPubMed Jerosch J, Castro WH, de Waal Malefijt MC, Busch M, van Kampen A (1997) Interobserver variation in diagnostic arthroscopy of the knee joint. “How really objective are arthroscopic findings?”. Unfallchirurg 100:782–786CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502 Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502
14.
go back to reference Marx RG, Connor J, Lyman S, Amendola A, Andrish JT, Kaeding C, McCarty EC, Parker RD, Wright RW, Spindler KP (2005) Multirater agreement of arthroscopic grading of knee articular cartilage. Am J Sports Med 33:1654–1657CrossRefPubMed Marx RG, Connor J, Lyman S, Amendola A, Andrish JT, Kaeding C, McCarty EC, Parker RD, Wright RW, Spindler KP (2005) Multirater agreement of arthroscopic grading of knee articular cartilage. Am J Sports Med 33:1654–1657CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Oakley SP, Lassere MN (2003) A critical appraisal of quantitative arthroscopy as an outcome measure in osteoarthritis of the knee. Semin Arthritis Rheum 33:83–105CrossRefPubMed Oakley SP, Lassere MN (2003) A critical appraisal of quantitative arthroscopy as an outcome measure in osteoarthritis of the knee. Semin Arthritis Rheum 33:83–105CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Outerbridge RE (1957) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43:752–757 Outerbridge RE (1957) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43:752–757
17.
go back to reference Spahn G, Klinger HM, Hofmann GO (2009) How valid is the arthroscopic diagnosis of cartilage lesions? Results of an opinion survey among highly experienced arthroscopic surgeons. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:1117–1121CrossRefPubMed Spahn G, Klinger HM, Hofmann GO (2009) How valid is the arthroscopic diagnosis of cartilage lesions? Results of an opinion survey among highly experienced arthroscopic surgeons. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:1117–1121CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Spahn G, Plettenberg H, Kahl E, Klinger HM, Muckley T, Hofmann GO (2007) Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. A new method for arthroscopic evaluation of low grade degenerated cartilage lesions. Results of a pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:47CrossRefPubMed Spahn G, Plettenberg H, Kahl E, Klinger HM, Muckley T, Hofmann GO (2007) Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. A new method for arthroscopic evaluation of low grade degenerated cartilage lesions. Results of a pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:47CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Uchio Y, Ochi M, Adachi N, Kawasaki K, Iwasa J (2002) Arthroscopic assessment of human cartilage stiffness of the femoral condyles and the patella with a new tactile sensor. Med Eng Phys 24:431–435CrossRefPubMed Uchio Y, Ochi M, Adachi N, Kawasaki K, Iwasa J (2002) Arthroscopic assessment of human cartilage stiffness of the femoral condyles and the patella with a new tactile sensor. Med Eng Phys 24:431–435CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reliability in arthroscopic grading of cartilage lesions: results of a prospective blinded study for evaluation of inter-observer reliability
Authors
Gunter Spahn
Hans Michael Klinger
Mike Baums
Ulrich Pinkepank
Gunther O. Hofmann
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1259-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 3/2011 Go to the issue