Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Spine Journal
Published in: European Spine Journal 9/2016

Open Access 01-09-2016 | Original Article

Reliability among clinicians diagnosing low back-related leg pain

Authors: Siobhán Stynes, Kika Konstantinou, Kate M. Dunn, Martyn Lewis, Elaine M. Hay

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 9/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate agreement and reliability among clinicians when diagnosing low back-related leg pain (LBLP) in primary care consulters.

Methods

Thirty-six patients were assessed by one of six physiotherapists and diagnosed as having either leg pain due to nerve root involvement (sciatica) or referred leg pain. Assessments were video recorded. In part one, the physiotherapists each viewed videos of six patients they had not assessed. In part two, videos were viewed by another six health professionals. All clinicians made an independent differential diagnosis and rated their confidence with diagnosis (range 50–100 %).

Results

In part one agreement was 72 % with fair inter-rater reliability (K = 0.35, 95 % CI 0.07, 0.63). Results for part two were almost identical (K = 0.34, 95 % CI 0.02, 0.69). Agreement and reliability indices improved as diagnostic confidence increased.

Conclusion

Reliability was fair among clinicians from different backgrounds when diagnosing LBLP but improved substantially with high confidence in clinical diagnosis.
Literature
1.
Haswell K, Gilmour J, Moore B (2008) Clinical decision rules for identification of low back pain patients with neurologic involvement in primary care. Spine 33(1):68–73CrossRefPubMed
2.
Bogduk N (2009) On the definitions and physiology of back pain, referred pain, and radicular pain. Pain 147(1–3):17–19CrossRefPubMed
3.
Mannion A, Mutter U, Fekete T, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, Kleinstuck F (2014) Validity of a single-item measure to assess leg or back pain as the predominant symptom in patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 23(4):882–887CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Scholz J, Mannion RJ, Hord DE, Griffin RS, Rawal B, Zheng H, Scoffings D, Phillips A, Guo J, Laing RJC, Abdi S, Decosterd I, Woolf CJ (2009) A novel tool for the assessment of pain: validation in low back pain. PLoS Med 6(4):e1000047CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Vroomen P, de Krom MC, Knottnerus J (1999) Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients with sciatica due to disc herniation; a systematic review. J Neurol 246(10):899–906CrossRefPubMed
6.
van der Windt DA, Simons E, Riphagen I, Ammendolia C, Verhagen AP, Laslett M, Deville W, Deyo RA, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW, Aertgeerts B (2010) Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2(2):CD007431
7.
Jensen M, Brant-Zawadski M, Obuchowski N, Modic M, Malkasian D, Ross J (1994) MRI imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. New Engl J Med 331(2):69–73CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Karppinen J, Malmivaara A, Tervonen O, Pääkkö E, Kurunlahti M, Syrjälä P, Vasari P, Vanharanta H (2001) Severity of symptoms and signs in relation to Magnetic Resonance Imaging findings among sciatic patients. Spine 26(7):E149–E154CrossRefPubMed
10.
Coggon D, Martyn C, Palmer K, Evanoff B (2005) Assessing case definitions in the absence of a diagnostic gold standard. Int J Epidemiol 34(4):949–952CrossRefPubMed
11.
McCarthy CJ, Gittins M, Roberts C, Oldham JA (2007) The reliability of the clinical tests and questions recommended in international guidelines for low back pain. Spine 32(8):921–926CrossRefPubMed
12.
Smart K, Curley A, Blake C, Staines A, Doody C (2010) The reliability of clinical judgments and criteria associated with mechanisms-based classifications of pain in patients with low back pain disorders: a preliminary reliability study. J Manual Manip Therapy 18(2):102–110CrossRef
13.
Vroomen P, de Krom MC, Knottnerus J (2000) Consistency of history taking and physical examination in patients with suspected lumbar nerve root involvement. Spine 25(1):91–96CrossRefPubMed
14.
Busse J, Riva J, Nash J, Hsu S, Fisher C, Wai E, Brunarski D (2013) Surgeon attitudes toward nonphysician screening of low back or low back-related leg pain patients referred for surgical assessment: a survey of Canadian spine surgeons. Spine 38(7):E402–E408CrossRefPubMed
15.
Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hrobjartsson A, Roberts C, Shoukri M, Streiner DL (2011) Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 64(1):96–106CrossRefPubMed
16.
Konstantinou K, Beardmore R, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Hider SL, Sanders T, Jowett S, Somerville S, Stynes S, van der Windt DA, Vogel S, Hay EM (2012) Clinical course, characteristics and prognostic indicators in patients presenting with back and leg pain in primary care, The ATLAS study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:4. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2474-13-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Sim J, Wright C (2005) The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 85(3):257–268PubMed
18.
Konstantinou K, Hider S, Vogel S, Beardmore R, Somerville S (2012) Development of an assessment schedule for patients with low back-associated leg pain in primary care: a Delphi consensus study. Eur Spine J 21(7):1241–1249CrossRefPubMed
19.
Landis JR, Koch GC (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRefPubMed
20.
Dunn KM, Jordan KP, Croft PR (2010) Recall of medication use, self-care activities and pain intensity: a comparison of daily diaries and self-report questionnaires among low back pain patients. Prim Health Care Res Dev 11:93–102CrossRef
21.
Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ, Singer DE, Chapin A, Keller RB (1995) Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine 20(17):1899–1908CrossRefPubMed
22.
Schafer A, Hall TM, Ludtke K, Mallwitz J, Briffa N (2009) Interrater reliability of a new classification system for patients with neural low back-related leg pain. The Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 17(2):109–117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
24.
Vach W (2005) The dependence of Cohen’s kappa on the prevalence does not matter. J Clin Epidemiol 58(7):655–661CrossRefPubMed
25.
Freynhagen R, Rolke R, Baron R, Tolle TR, Rutjes A-K, Schu S, Treede R-D (2008) Pseudoradicular and radicular low-back pain—a disease continuum rather than different entities? Answers from quantitative sensory testing. Pain 135(1–2):65–74CrossRefPubMed
26.
Lin C, Verwoerd A, Maher C, Verhagen A, Pinto R, Luijsterburg P, Hancock M (2014) How is radiating leg pain defined in randomized controlled trials of conservative treatments in primary care? A systematic review. Eur J Pain 18(4):455–464CrossRefPubMed
27.
Coleman T (2000) Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: advantages and limitations. Fam Pract 17(5):422–427CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reliability among clinicians diagnosing low back-related leg pain
Authors
Siobhán Stynes
Kika Konstantinou
Kate M. Dunn
Martyn Lewis
Elaine M. Hay
Publication date
01-09-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4359-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2016

European Spine Journal 9/2016 Go to the issue

Original Article

Red flags presented in current low back pain guidelines: a review

Letter to the Editor

Is duration of preoperative anti-tuberculosis treatment a risk factor for postoperative relapse or non-healing of spinal tuberculosis: response to comments by Li et al.

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor concerning “Validity and reliability of photographic measures to evaluate waistline asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis” by Matamalas A, Bagó J, D Agata E, Pellisé F (2016) Eur Spine J. 2016 Mar 14 [Epub ahead of print]

Original Article

The role of intense athletic activity on structural lumbar abnormalities in adolescent patients with symptomatic low back pain

Original Article

Effect of depression and neuropathic pain using questionnaires on quality of life in patients with low back pain; cross-sectional retrospective study

Original Article

Novel COL2A1 mutations causing spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita in three unrelated Chinese families