Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2007

01-06-2007

Relative Implant Volume and Sensibility Alterations After Breast Augmentation

Authors: Ivo Pitanguy, M.D., Michel Vaena, L.H.T., M.D., Henrique N. Radwanski, M.D., Daniel Nunes, M.D., André F. Vargas, M.D.

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Recent studies have provided diverging results regarding the factors that may affect sensibility after primary breast augmentation. Implant volume is believed to be an important factor, but the relation of implant size to breast volume has not been adequately addressed. In addition, the literature shows that a conflict exists when the periareolar and inframammary approaches are compared. This study aimed to refine the volumetric analysis comparing the implant and final breast size as well as the intrinsic association of these two factors with postoperative sensory alteration of the breast.

Methods

A prospective study investigated patients who underwent aesthetic breast augmentation between June 2004 and October 2005 (i.e., a 16-month period) at the Ivo Pitanguy Institute. The sensibility in nine regions of the breast was tested before and after surgery using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Breast sizers were used to compare the pre- and postoperative breast volumes. Statistical analysis of the data took into consideration the relative volume of the implant, the surgical approach, the presence of minor complications, the breast-feeding history, and the subjective evaluation of sensory changes in the patients.

Results

A total of 37 patients who underwent breast augmentation were examined preoperatively. The relative volume of the implant was found to be associated with sensibility alterations. No difference was found between the periareolar and inframammary incision approaches. Other factors such as previous breast-feeding, minor complications, and subjective alterations were not associated with sensory alterations.

Conclusions

The study findings suggest that larger implants and smaller breasts show an increased association with postoperative sensory alterations of the breast. Plastic surgeons and their patients should be aware of this possibility. Implant volume should be considered together with breast size to avoid sensory complications, and this is summarized in the concept of relative volume.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Fiala TGS, Lee WPA, May JW: Augmentation mammaplasty: Results of a patient survey. Ann Plast Surg 30:503, 1993PubMedCrossRef Fiala TGS, Lee WPA, May JW: Augmentation mammaplasty: Results of a patient survey. Ann Plast Surg 30:503, 1993PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hetter GP: Satisfactions and dissatisfactions of patients with augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 64:151, 1979PubMedCrossRef Hetter GP: Satisfactions and dissatisfactions of patients with augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 64:151, 1979PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM: Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:1, 1976PubMedCrossRef Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM: Breast sensation before and after plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:1, 1976PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper ME, Kuzbari R: Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: A prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:743, 2005PubMedCrossRef Schlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper ME, Kuzbari R: Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by reduction mammaplasty: A prospective comparison of five techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:743, 2005PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mofid M, Dellon L, Elias J, Nahabedian M: Quantification of breast sensibility following reduction mammaplasty: A comparison of inferior and medial pedicle techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2283, 2002PubMedCrossRef Mofid M, Dellon L, Elias J, Nahabedian M: Quantification of breast sensibility following reduction mammaplasty: A comparison of inferior and medial pedicle techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2283, 2002PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Terzis JK, Vincent MP, Wilkins LM, Rutledge K, Deane LM: Breast sensibility: A neurophysiological appraisal in the normal breast. Ann Plast Surg 19:318, 1987PubMedCrossRef Terzis JK, Vincent MP, Wilkins LM, Rutledge K, Deane LM: Breast sensibility: A neurophysiological appraisal in the normal breast. Ann Plast Surg 19:318, 1987PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Okwueze MI, Spear ME, Zwyghuizen AM, Braun SA, Ajmal N, Nanney LB, Hagan KF, Wolfort SF, Shack RB: Effect of augmentation mammaplasty on breast sensation. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:73, 2006PubMedCrossRef Okwueze MI, Spear ME, Zwyghuizen AM, Braun SA, Ajmal N, Nanney LB, Hagan KF, Wolfort SF, Shack RB: Effect of augmentation mammaplasty on breast sensation. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:73, 2006PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mofid M, MD, Klatsky S, MD, Singh N, Nahabedian M, MD: Nipple–areola complex sensitivity after primary breast augmentation: A comparison of periareolar and inframammary incision approaches. Plast Reconstr Surg117:1694, 2006 Mofid M, MD, Klatsky S, MD, Singh N, Nahabedian M, MD: Nipple–areola complex sensitivity after primary breast augmentation: A comparison of periareolar and inframammary incision approaches. Plast Reconstr Surg117:1694, 2006
10.
go back to reference Nahabedian MY: Effect of augmentation mammaplasty on breast sensation: Discussion. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:84, 2006CrossRef Nahabedian MY: Effect of augmentation mammaplasty on breast sensation: Discussion. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:84, 2006CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tairych GV, Kuzbari R, Rigel S, Todoroff BP, Schneider B, Deutinger M: Normal cutaneous sensibility of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:701, 1998PubMedCrossRef Tairych GV, Kuzbari R, Rigel S, Todoroff BP, Schneider B, Deutinger M: Normal cutaneous sensibility of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:701, 1998PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gonzalez F, Brown F, Gold M, Walton R, Shafer B: Preoperative and postoperative nipple–areola sensibility in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:809, 1993PubMed Gonzalez F, Brown F, Gold M, Walton R, Shafer B: Preoperative and postoperative nipple–areola sensibility in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 92:809, 1993PubMed
13.
go back to reference Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L, Geigant E, Solders G: Touch sensibility in the breast after subcutaneous and immediate reconstruction with a prosthesis. Br J Plast Surg 50:443, 1997PubMedCrossRef Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L, Geigant E, Solders G: Touch sensibility in the breast after subcutaneous and immediate reconstruction with a prosthesis. Br J Plast Surg 50:443, 1997PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schlenz I, Kuzbari R, Gruber H, Holle J: The sensitivity of the nipple–areola complex: An anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:905, 2000PubMedCrossRef Schlenz I, Kuzbari R, Gruber H, Holle J: The sensitivity of the nipple–areola complex: An anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:905, 2000PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Farina MA, Newby BG, Alani HM: Innervation of the nipple–areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 66:497, 1980PubMedCrossRef Farina MA, Newby BG, Alani HM: Innervation of the nipple–areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 66:497, 1980PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jaspars J, Posma A, Van Immerseel A, Gittenberger-de-Groot A: The cutaneous innervation of the female breast and nipple–areola complex: Implications for surgery. Br J Plast Surg 50:249, 1997PubMedCrossRef Jaspars J, Posma A, Van Immerseel A, Gittenberger-de-Groot A: The cutaneous innervation of the female breast and nipple–areola complex: Implications for surgery. Br J Plast Surg 50:249, 1997PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference França AL, Scevola MC, Fachin SD, França PF, França NC: Mamasize: A new auxiliary instrument in the planning of enlargement mammaplasty (Mamasize: um novo instrumento auxiliar no planejamento das mamoplastias). Rev Soc Bras Cir Plas 20:204, 2005 França AL, Scevola MC, Fachin SD, França PF, França NC: Mamasize: A new auxiliary instrument in the planning of enlargement mammaplasty (Mamasize: um novo instrumento auxiliar no planejamento das mamoplastias). Rev Soc Bras Cir Plas 20:204, 2005
18.
go back to reference Young VL, Nemecek JR, Nemecek DA: The efficacy of breast augmentation: Breast size increase, patient satisfaction, and psychological effects. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:958, 1994PubMedCrossRef Young VL, Nemecek JR, Nemecek DA: The efficacy of breast augmentation: Breast size increase, patient satisfaction, and psychological effects. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:958, 1994PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Spear SL, Matsuba H, Little J III: The medial periareolar approach to submuscular augmentation mammaplasty under local anesthesia. Plast Reconstr Surg 84:599, 1989PubMedCrossRef Spear SL, Matsuba H, Little J III: The medial periareolar approach to submuscular augmentation mammaplasty under local anesthesia. Plast Reconstr Surg 84:599, 1989PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pitanguy I: Transareolar incision for augmentation mammaplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 2:363, 1978CrossRef Pitanguy I: Transareolar incision for augmentation mammaplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 2:363, 1978CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tebbets JB: Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: Long-term follow-up and refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:497, 1980 Tebbets JB: Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: Long-term follow-up and refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:497, 1980
22.
go back to reference Banbury J, Yetman R, Lucas A, et al. Prospective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral breast augmentation: Sensory changes, muscle function, and body image. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:701, 2004PubMedCrossRef Banbury J, Yetman R, Lucas A, et al. Prospective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral breast augmentation: Sensory changes, muscle function, and body image. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:701, 2004PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sarhadi N, Dunn J, Lee F, Soutar D: An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast, including the nipple and areola. Br J Plast Surg 49:156, 1996PubMedCrossRef Sarhadi N, Dunn J, Lee F, Soutar D: An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast, including the nipple and areola. Br J Plast Surg 49:156, 1996PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Relative Implant Volume and Sensibility Alterations After Breast Augmentation
Authors
Ivo Pitanguy, M.D.
Michel Vaena, L.H.T., M.D.
Henrique N. Radwanski, M.D.
Daniel Nunes, M.D.
André F. Vargas, M.D.
Publication date
01-06-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2007
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0173-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2007

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2007 Go to the issue