Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Relative abdominal adiposity is associated with chronic low back pain: a preliminary explorative study

Authors: Cristy Brooks, Jason C. Siegler, Paul W. M. Marshall

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although previous research suggests a relationship between chronic low back pain (cLBP) and adiposity, this relationship is poorly understood. No research has explored the relationship between abdominal-specific subcutaneous and visceral adiposity with pain and disability in cLBP individuals. The aim of this study therefore was to examine the relationship of regional and total body adiposity to pain and disability in cLBP individuals.

Methods

A preliminary explorative study design of seventy (n = 70) adult men and women with cLBP was employed. Anthropometric and adiposity measures were collected, including body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, total body adiposity and specific ultrasound-based abdominal adiposity measurements. Self-reported pain and disability were measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaires respectively. Relationships between anthropometric and adiposity measures with pain and disability were assessed using correlation and regression analyses.

Results

Significant correlations between abdominal to lumbar adiposity ratio (A-L) variables and the waist-to-hip ratio with self-reported pain were observed. A-L variables were found to predict pain, with 9.1–30.5 % of the variance in pain across the three analysis models explained by these variables. No relationships between anthropometric or adiposity variables to self-reported disability were identified.

Conclusions

The findings of this study indicated that regional distribution of adiposity via the A-L is associated with cLBP, providing a rationale for future research on adiposity and cLBP.
Literature
1.
Walker BF, Muller R, Grant WD. Low back pain in Australian adults: the economic burden. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2003;15:79–87.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
Bener A, Alwash R, Gaber T, et al. Obesity and low back pain. Coll Antropol. 2003;27:95–104.PubMed
4.
Deyo RA, Bass JE. Lifestyle and low-back pain. The influence of smoking and obesity. Spine. 1989;14:501–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Han TS, Schouten JS, Lean ME, et al. The prevalence of low back pain and associations with body fatness, fat distribution and height. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1997;21:600–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Heuch I, Hagen K, Nygaard O, et al. The impact of body mass index on the prevalence of low back pain: the HUNT study. Spine. 2010;35:764–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Leboeuf-Yde C. Body weight and low back pain. A systematic literature review of 56 journal articles reporting on 65 epidemiologic studies. Spine. 2000;25:226–37.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Leboeuf Yde C, Kyvik KO, Bruun NH. Low back pain and lifestyle. Part II--Obesity. Information from a population-based sample of 29,424 twin subjects. Spine. 1999;24:779–83. discussion 783–774.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Mirtz TA, Greene L. Is obesity a risk factor for low back pain? An example of using the evidence to answer a clinical question. Chiropr Osteopat. 2005;13:2.
10.
Nilsen TI, Holtermann A, Mork PJ. Physical exercise, body mass index, and risk of chronic pain in the low back and neck/shoulders: longitudinal data from the Nord-Trondelag Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174:267–73.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Shiri R, Solovieva S, Husgafvel-Pursiainen K, et al. The association between obesity and the prevalence of low back pain in young adults: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:1110–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Urquhart DM, Berry P, Wluka AE, et al. 2011 Young Investigator Award winner: Increased fat mass is associated with high levels of low back pain intensity and disability. Spine. 2011;36:1320–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Mangwani J, Giles C, Mullins M, et al. Obesity and recovery from low back pain: a prospective study to investigate the effect of body mass index on recovery from low back pain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:23–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
WHO. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1–253
16.
Bazzocchi A, Filonzi G, Ponti F, et al. Accuracy, reproducibility and repeatability of ultrasonography in the assessment of abdominal adiposity. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:1133–43.CrossRefPubMed
17.
De Lucia RE, Sleigh A, Finucane FM, et al. Ultrasound measurements of visceral and subcutaneous abdominal thickness to predict abdominal adiposity among older men and women. Obesity. 2010;18:625–31.CrossRef
18.
Eston R, Evans R, Fu F. Estimation of body composition in Chinese and British men by ultrasonographic assessment of segmental adipose tissue volume. Br J Sports Med. 1994;28:9–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Fanelli MT, Kuczmarski RJ. Ultrasound as an approach to assessing body composition. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984;39:703–9.PubMed
20.
21.
Vlachos IS, Hatziioannou A, Perelas A, et al. Sonographic assessment of regional adiposity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:1545–53.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Deschenes D, Couture P, Dupont P, et al. Subdivision of the subcutaneous adipose tissue compartment and lipid-lipoprotein levels in women. Obes Res. 2003;11:469–76.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Fox CS, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, et al. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments: association with metabolic risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2007;116:39–48.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Shuster A, Patlas M, Pinthus JH, et al. The clinical importance of visceral adiposity: a critical review of methods for visceral adipose tissue analysis. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:1–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Ibrahim MM. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: structural and functional differences. Obes Rev. 2010;11:11–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Callaghan JP, McGill SM. Intervertebral disc herniation: studies on a porcine model exposed to highly repetitive flexion/extension motion with compressive force. Clin Biomech. 2001;16:28–37.CrossRef
27.
Boneva-Asiova Z, Boyanov MA. Body composition analysis by leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in non-obese and obese individuals. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008;10:1012–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Chouinard LE, Schoeller DA, Watras AC, et al. Bioelectrical impedance vs. four-compartment model to assess body fat change in overweight adults. Obesity. 2007;15:85–92.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis--part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr. 2004;23:1226–43.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Medrano G, Eitner F, Walter M, et al. Model-based correction of the influence of body position on continuous segmental and hand-to-foot bioimpedance measurements. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010;48:531–41.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Pateyjohns IR, Brinkworth GD, Buckley JD, et al. Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men. Obesity. 2006;14:2064–70.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Ritchie JD, Miller CK, Smiciklas-Wright H. Tanita foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis system validated in older adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105:1617–9.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Rush EC, Crowley J, Freitas IF, et al. Validity of hand-to-foot measurement of bioimpedance: standing compared with lying position. Obesity. 2006;14:252–7.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Thomson R, Brinkworth GD, Buckley JD, et al. Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women. Clin Nutr. 2007;26:771–7.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Bigaard J, Frederiksen K, Tjonneland A, et al. Waist and hip circumferences and all-cause mortality: usefulness of the waist-to-hip ratio? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:741–7.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Peterson MD, Zhang P, Haapala HJ, et al. Greater Adipose Tissue Distribution and Diminished Spinal Musculoskeletal Density in Adults With Cerebral Palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:1828–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Marshall P, Murphy B. Delayed abdominal muscle onsets and self-report measures of pain and disability in chronic low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010;20:833–9.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Marshall PW, Murphy BA. Evaluation of functional and neuromuscular changes after exercise rehabilitation for low back pain using a Swiss ball: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29:550–60.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Marshall PW, Murphy BA. Muscle activation changes after exercise rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1305–13.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:1153–7.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Chapman JR, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, et al. Evaluating common outcomes for measuring treatment success for chronic low back pain. Spine. 2011;36:S54–68.CrossRefPubMed
42.
43.
Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, et al. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63 Suppl 11:S240–52.CrossRef
44.
Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, et al. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983;17:45–56.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25:3115–24.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Egger G, Dixon J. Non-nutrient causes of low-grade, systemic inflammation: Support for a ‘canary in the mineshaft’ view of obesity in chronic disease. Obes Rev. 2011;12:339–45.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Gleeson M, Bishop NC, Stensel DJ, et al. The anti-inflammatory effects of exercise: mechanisms and implications for the prevention and treatment of disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:607–15.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Farquhar-Smith WP. Anatomy, physiology and pharmacology of pain. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008;9:3–7.CrossRef
49.
Briggs MS, Givens DL, Schmitt LC, et al. Relations of C-reactive protein and obesity to the prevalence and the odds of reporting low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:745–52.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Bigaard J, Thomsen BL, Tjonneland A, et al. Does waist circumference alone explain obesity-related health risk? Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:790–1. author reply 791–792.PubMed
51.
Howarth SJ, Callaghan JP. Compressive force magnitude and intervertebral joint flexion/extension angle influence shear failure force magnitude in the porcine cervical spine. J Biomech. 2012;45:484–90.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Brooks C, Siegler JC, Cheema BS, et al. No Relationship Between Body Mass Index and Changes in Pain and Disability After Exercise Rehabilitation for Patients With Mild to Moderate Chronic Low Back Pain. Spine. 2013;38:1–6.CrossRef
53.
Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine. 2008;33:90–4.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Relative abdominal adiposity is associated with chronic low back pain: a preliminary explorative study
Authors
Cristy Brooks
Jason C. Siegler
Paul W. M. Marshall
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3357-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Second-hand smoke in four English prisons: an air quality monitoring study

Research article

The height-, weight- and BMI-for-age of preschool children from Nizhny Novgorod city, Russia, relative to the international growth references

Study protocol

CardioBengo study protocol: a population based cardiovascular longitudinal study in Bengo Province, Angola

Research article

Type of sexual intercourse experience and suicidal ideation, plans, and attempts among youths: a cross-sectional study in South Korea

Study protocol

Reducing violence and increasing condom use in the intimate partnerships of female sex workers: study protocol for Samvedana Plus, a cluster randomised controlled trial in Karnataka state, south India

Study protocol

Physical and social environmental changes to promote walking among Dutch older adults in deprived neighbourhoods: the NEW.ROADS study