Top

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Published in:

01-08-2019 | Original Article

Relationships between the results of anorectal investigations and symptom severity in patients with faecal incontinence

Authors: P. T. Heitmann, P. Rabbitt, A. Schloithe, V. Patton, P. P. Skuza, D. A. Wattchow, P. G. Dinning

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 8/2019

Abstract

Purpose

Anorectal dysfunction is the focus of diagnostic investigations for faecal incontinence. However, severity of incontinence and anorectal investigation results can be discordant. The aim of this study was to define the relationships between anorectal investigation results and incontinence severity to determine which measures, if any, were predictive of incontinence severity.

Methods

Patients presenting for investigation of faecal incontinence completed a symptom questionnaire, anorectal manometry, rectal sensation, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, and endoanal ultrasound. Bivariate analyses were conducted between the Jorge-Wexner score and investigation results. Subgroup analyses were performed for gender and symptom subtypes (urge, passive, mixed). A multiple regression analysis was performed.

Results

Five hundred and thirty-eight patients were included. There were weak correlations between the Jorge-Wexner score and maximal squeeze pressure [r = − 0.24, 95%CI(− 0.31, − 0.16), p < 0.001], and resting pressure [r = − 0.18, (95%CI(− 0.26, − 0.10), p < 0.001]. In men only, there were significant associations between the Jorge-Wexner score and endoanal sonography [IAS defects: t(113) = − 2.26, p = 0.03, d = 0.58, 95%CI(− 4.38, − 0.29)] and rectal sensation (MTV: r_s = − 0.24, 95%CI(− 0.41, − 0.06), p = 0.01). No substantial differences were observed in the urge/passive/mixed subgroup analyses. Multiple regression analysis included three variables: age (β = 0.02, p = 0.17), maximal resting pressure (β = − 0.01, p = 0.28), and maximal squeeze pressure (β = − 0.01, p < 0.01). The variance in the Jorge-Wexner score accounted for by this model was < 10%, (R² = 0.07, p = < 0.01, adjusted R² = 0.06).

Conclusion

Anorectal investigations cannot predict the severity of faecal incontinence. This may be due to limitations of diagnostic modalities, the heterogeneity of anorectal dysfunction in these patients, or contributing factors which are extrinsic to the anorectum.

McCallum JSL, Simons J, Dong T, Millar L (2007) Risks and burdens of incontinence in an older community: the Dubbo longitudinal study of the elderly 1988–2003. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC (2000) Fecal incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):9–16, discussion 16–17

Johanson JF, Lafferty J (1996) Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol 91(1):33–36PubMed

Brown HW, Wexner SD, Segall MM, Brezoczky KL, Lukacz ES (2012) Quality of life impact in women with accidental bowel leakage. Int J Clin Pract 66(11):1109–1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12017 CrossRefPubMed

Sharma A, Yuan L, Marshall RJ, Merrie AE, Bissett IP (2016) Systematic review of the prevalence of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 103(12):1589–1597. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10298 CrossRefPubMed

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2013) Incontinence in Australia. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra

Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36(1):77–97CrossRefPubMed

Hayden DM, Weiss EG (2011) Fecal incontinence: etiology, evaluation, and treatment. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24(1):64–70. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1272825 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rao SS, American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters C (2004) Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. American College of Gastroenterology practice parameters committee. Am J Gastroenterol 99(8):1585–1604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40105.x CrossRefPubMed

10.

Abramowitz L, Sobhani I, Ganansia R, Vuagnat A, Benifla JL, Darai E, Madelenat P, Mignon M (2000) Are sphincter defects the cause of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery? Results of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 43(5):590–596, discussion 596–598

11.

Rieger NSA, Saccone G, Wattchow D (1998) A prospective study of anal sphincter injury due to childbirth. Scand J Gastroenterol 33(8):950–955PubMed

12.

Oberwalder M, Connor J, Wexner SD (2003) Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage. Br J Surg 90(11):1333–1337. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4369 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Loganathan ASA, Hakendorf P, Liyanage CM, Costa M, Wattchow D (2013) Prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency is associated with decreased resting and squeeze pressures in the intact anal sphincter. Color Dis 15:1410–1415CrossRef

14.

Engel AF, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ (1995) Relationship of symptoms in faecal incontinence to specific sphincter abnormalities. Int J Color Dis 10(3):152–155CrossRef

15.

Vaizey CJKM, Bartram C (1997) Primary degeneration of the internal anal sphincter as a cause of passive faecal incontinence. Lancet 349(9052):612–615CrossRefPubMed

16.

Mion F, Garros A, Brochard C, Vitton V, Ropert A, Bouvier M, Damon H, Siproudhis L, Roman S (2017) 3D high-definition anorectal manometry: values obtained in asymptomatic volunteers, fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Results of a prospective multicenter study (NOMAD). Neurogastroenterol Motil 29(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13049

17.

Felt-Bersma RJ, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Meuwissen SG (1990) Anorectal function investigations in incontinent and continent patients. Differences and discriminatory value. Dis Colon Rectum 33(6):479–485, discussion 485–476

18.

Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Harper CM, Hough D, Daube JR, Stevens C, Seide B, Riederer SJ, Zinsmeister AR (2005) Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic faecal incontinence. Gut 54(4):546–555. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2004.047696 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Townsend DCCE, Grossi U, Burgell RE, Wong JY, Knowles CH, Scott SM (2016) Pathophysiology of fecal incontinence differs between men and women: a case-matched study in 200 patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil 28(10):1580–1588CrossRefPubMed

20.

Lam TJMC, Felt-Bersma RJ (2012) Critical reappraisal of anorectal function tests in patients with fecal incontinence who have failed conservative treatment. Int J Color Dis 27:931–937CrossRef

21.

Titi MA, Jenkins JT, Urie A, Molloy RG (2008) Correlation between anal manometry and endosonography in females with faecal incontinence. Color Dis 10(2):131–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01312.x CrossRef

22.

Zutschi M, Salcedo L, Hammel J, Hull T (2009) Anal physiology testing in fecal incontinence: is it of any value? Int J Color Dis 25(2):277–282CrossRef

23.

Bartolo DC, Read NW, Jarratt JA, Read MG, Donnelly TC, Johnson AG (1983) Differences in anal sphincter function and clinical presentation in patients with pelvic floor descent. Gastroenterology 85(1):68–75PubMed

24.

Read NW, Harford WV, Schmulen AC, Read MG, Santa Ana C, Fordtran JS (1979) A clinical study of patients with fecal incontinence and diarrhea. Gastroenterology 76(4):747–756PubMed

25.

Swash MSS (1992) Motor nerve conduction studies of the pelvic floor innervation. Coloproctology and the pelvic floor, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

26.

Haukoos JS, Lewis RJ (2005) Advanced statistics: bootstrapping confidence intervals for statistics with “difficult” distributions. Acad Emerg Med 12(4):360–365. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2004.11.018 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Team RDC (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 19 Dec 2018

28.

Lenhard WLA (2016) Calculation of Effect Sizes. https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html

29.

Dinning PGCE, Scott SM (2016) Colonic and anorectsal motility testing in the high-resolution era. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 32(1):44–48CrossRefPubMed

30.

Carrington EV, Heinrich H, Knowles CH, Rao SS, Fox M, Scott SM, International Anorectal Physiology Working Party G (2017) Methods of anorectal manometry vary widely in clinical practice: results from an international survey. Neurogastroenterol Motil 29(8):e13016. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13016 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Seo M, Joo S, Jung KW, Song EM, Rao SSC, Myung SJ (2018) New metrics in high-resolution and high-definition anorectal manometry. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 20(12):57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-018-0662-5 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Carrington EVKC, Grossi U, Scott SM (2019) High-resolution anorectal manometry measures are more accurate than conventional measures in detecting anal hypocontractility in women with fecal incontinence. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 17(3):477–485CrossRefPubMed

33.

Ledgerwood-Lee M, Zifan A, Kunkel DC, Sah R, Mittal RK (2019) High-frequency ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter muscles in normal subjects and patients with fecal incontinence. Neurogastroenterol Motil 31(4):e13537. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13537 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Kiff ES, Swash M (1984) Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 71(8):614–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800710817 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Parks AG, Swash M, Urich H (1977) Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Gut 18(8):656–665. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.18.8.656 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Snooks SSSM, Henry MM, Setchell M (1984) Injury to innervation of pelvic floor musculature in childbirth. Lancet 324:546–550CrossRef

37.

Sun WMRN, Miner PB (1990) Relation between rectal sensation and anal function in normal subjects and patients with faecal incontinence. Gut 31:1056–1061CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

AE B (2006) Pelvic floor: anatomy and function. Neurogastroenterol Motil 18:507–519CrossRef

39.

Buser WDMPJ (1986) Delayed rectal sensation with fecal incontinence. Successful treatment using anorectal manometry. Gastroenterology 91:1186–1191CrossRefPubMed

40.

Saraidaridis JT, Molina G, Savit LR, Milch H, Mei T, Chin S, Kuo J, Bordeianou L (2018) Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing does not provide useful information in guiding therapy for fecal incontinence. Int J Color Dis 33:305–310CrossRef

41.

Young CJ, Zahid A, Koh CE, Young JM (2017) Hypothesized summative anal physiology score correlates but poorly predicts incontinence severity. World J Gastroenterol 23(31):5732–5738. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i31.5732 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Rieger NA, Sarre RG, Saccone GT, Schloithe AC, Wattchow DA (1997) Correlation of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency with the results of anal manometry. Int J Color Dis 12(5):303–307CrossRef

43.

Carrington EV, Scott SM, Bharucha A, Mion F, Remes-Troche JM, Malcolm A, Heinrich H, Fox M, Rao SS, International Anorectal Physiology Working G, the International Working Group for Disorders of Gastrointestinal M, Function (2018) Expert consensus document: advances in the evaluation of anorectal function. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 15(5):309–323. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2018.27 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Thomas C, Lefaucheur JP, Galula G, de Parades V, Bourguignon J, Atienza P (2002) Respective value of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency and anal sphincter electromyography in neurogenic fecal incontinence. Neurophysiol Clin 32(1):85–90CrossRefPubMed

45.

Gregory WT, Lou JS, Stuyvesant A, Clark AL (2004) Quantitative electromyography of the anal sphincter after uncomplicated vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 104(2):327–335. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000134527.07034.81 CrossRefPubMed

46.

Diamant NE, Kamm MA, Wald A, Whitehead WE (1999) AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology 116(3):735–760CrossRefPubMed

47.

Scott SM, Gladman MA (2008) Manometric, sensorimotor, and neurophysiologic evaluation of anorectal function. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 37(3):511–538, vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2008.06.010 CrossRef

48.

Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44(1):77–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.44.1.77 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Bharucha AE, Locke GR 3rd, Seide BM, Zinsmeister AR (2004) A new questionnaire for constipation and faecal incontinence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20(3):355–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02028.x CrossRefPubMed

50.

Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC (1999) Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 42(12):1525–1532CrossRefPubMed

51.

TH R (2004) Incontinence severity and QOL scales for fecal incontinence. Gastroent 126(1)

52.

Duelund-Jakobsen J, Worsoe J, Lundby L, Christensen P, Krogh K (2016) Management of patients with faecal incontinence. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 9(1):86–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756283X15614516 CrossRef

53.

Nevler A (2014) The epidemiology of anal incontinence and symptom severity scoring. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2(2):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gou005 CrossRef

54.

Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA, Lowry AC (2003) Measuring fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46(12):1591–1605. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DCR.0000098906.61097.1C CrossRefPubMed

55.

Rothbarth JBW, Meijerink WJ, Stiggelbout AM, Zwinderman AH, Buyze-Westerweel ME, Delemarre JB (2001) What is the impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life? Dis Colon Rectum 44(1):67–71CrossRefPubMed

56.

Minguez M, Garrigues V, Soria MJ, Andreu M, Mearin F, Clave P (2006) Adaptation to Spanish language and validation of the fecal incontinence quality of life scale. Dis Colon Rectum 49(4):490–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0514-5 CrossRefPubMed

57.

t Hoen LA, Utomo E, Schouten WR, Blok BF, Korfage IJ (2017) The fecal incontinence quality of life scale (FIQL) and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI): validation of the Dutch versions. Neurourol Urodyn 36(3):710–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23003 CrossRef

58.

Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer E, Troidl H (1995) Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82(2):216–222CrossRefPubMed

59.

Bharucha AE, Dunivan G, Goode PS, Lukacz ES, Markland AD, Matthews CA, Mott L, Rogers RG, Zinsmeister AR, Whitehead WE, Rao SS, Hamilton FA (2015) Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and classification of fecal incontinence: state of the science summary for the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) workshop. Am J Gastroenterol 110(1):127–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.396 CrossRefPubMed

60.

Kamm MA, van der Sijp JR, Lennard-Jones JE (1992) Colorectal and anal motility during defaecation. Lancet 339(8796):820CrossRefPubMed

61.

Herbst FKM, Morris GP, Britton K, Woloszko J, Nicholls RJ (1997) Gastrointestinal transit and prolonged ambulatory colonic motility in health and faecal incon-tinence. Gut 41:381–389CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Bampton PA, Dinning PG, Kennedy ML, Lubowski DZ, deCarle D, Cook IJ (2000) Spatial and temporal organization of pressure patterns throughout the unprepared colon during spontaneous defecation. Am J Gastroenterol 95(4):1027–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01839.x CrossRefPubMed

63.

Ritchie J (1968) Colonic motor activity and bowel function. Gut 9:442–456CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Rao SS, Welcher K (1996) Periodic rectal motor activity: the intrinsic colonic gatekeeper? Am J Gastroenterol 91(5):890–897PubMed

65.

Dinning PGWL, Maslen L, Gibbins I, Patton V, Arkwright JW et al (2014) Quantification of in vivo colonic motor patterns in healthy humans before and after a meal revealed by high-resolution fiber-optic manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 26(10):1443–1457CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Kern F Jr, Almy TP, Abbot FK, Bogdonoff MD (1951) The motility of the distal colon in nonspecific ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 19(3):492–503CrossRefPubMed

67.

Bazzocchi G, Ellis J, Villanueva-Meyer J, Reddy SN, Mena I, Snape WJ Jr (1991) Effect of eating on colonic motility and transit in patients with functional diarrhea. Simultaneous scintigraphic and manometric evaluations. Gastroenterology 101(5):1298–1306CrossRefPubMed

68.

Patton V, Wiklendt L, Arkwright JW, Lubowski DZ, Dinning PG (2013) The effect of sacral nerve stimulation on distal colonic motility in patients with faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 100(7):959–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9114 CrossRefPubMed

69.

Rodger CJ, Nicol L, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Finlay IG (2010) Abnormal colonic motility: a possible association with urge fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 53(4):409–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181cc55cc CrossRefPubMed

70.

Dinning PGWL, Gibbins I, Patton V, Bampton PA, Lubowski DZ, Cook IJ, Arkwright JW (2013) Low-resolution colonic manometry leads to a gross mis-interpretation of the frequency and polarity of propagating sequences: initial results from fibreoptic high-resolution manometry studies. Neurogastroenterol Motil 25(10):e640–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12170

71.

Lin AY, Du P, Dinning PG, Arkwright JW, Kamp JP, Cheng LK, Bissett IP, O'Grady G (2017) High-resolution anatomic correlation of cyclic motor patterns in the human colon: evidence of a rectosigmoid brake. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 312(5):G508–G515. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00021.2017 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

72.

Hallan RI, Marzouk DE, Waldron DJ, Womack NR, Williams NS (1989) Comparison of digital and manometric assessment of anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 76(9):973–975CrossRefPubMed

73.

Wald A (2006) Con: anorectal manometry and imaging are not necessary in patients with fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2681–2683CrossRefPubMed

74.

Bharucha AE (2006) Pro: anorectal testing is useful in fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 101:2679–2681CrossRefPubMed

75.

Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA (2000) Prospective assessment of the clinical value of anorectal investigations. Digestion 61(3):207–214. https://doi.org/10.1159/000007759 CrossRefPubMed

76.

Rao SSPR (1997) How useful are manometric tests of anorectal function in the management of defecation disorders? Am J Gastroenterol 92:469–475PubMed

77.

Wexner SDJM (1994) Colorectal physiological tests: use of abuse of technology? Fur J Surg 160:167–174

Title: Relationships between the results of anorectal investigations and symptom severity in patients with faecal incontinence
Authors: P. T. Heitmann
P. Rabbitt
A. Schloithe
V. Patton
P. P. Skuza
D. A. Wattchow
P. G. Dinning
Publication date: 01-08-2019
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03331-0

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Relationships between the results of anorectal investigations and symptom severity in patients with faecal incontinence

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

Prospective randomized clinical trial of uncomplicated right-sided colonic diverticulitis: antibiotics versus no antibiotics

Role of pre-existing type 2 diabetes in colorectal cancer survival among older Americans: a SEER-Medicare population-based study 2002–2011

Ambulatory versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Local regrowth after ʻWatch and Waitʼ strategy: is salvage surgery enough for disease control?

Risk factors for proctectomy in consecutive Crohn’s colitis surgical patients in a reference colorectal centre

The influence of pulmonary comorbidities on treatment choice and short-term surgical outcomes among elderly patients with colorectal cancer