Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2009

01-09-2009 | Pediatrics

Relationship between oculomotor scanning determined by the DEM test and a contextual reading test in schoolchildren with reading difficulties

Authors: Catalina Palomo-Álvarez, María C. Puell

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 9/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The relationship between oculomotor scanning and reading in poor readers of primary school age is not well known. This study was designed to assess this relationship by determining mean Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) test times and reading speeds in a Spanish non-clinical population of children with poor reading skills but without dyslexia.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study on 81 poor readers (8–11 years of age) in the third to fifth grades recruited from 11 elementary schools in Madrid, Spain. In each subject with best spectacle correction, oculomotor scanning was measured using the DEM test, and reading speed (words per minute) was assessed by a standardized Spanish contextual reading test.

Results

Mean horizontal DEM times were higher than normative values for children in the third, fourth and fifth grades, by 20 seconds, 12 seconds, and 3 seconds respectively. Mean reading speeds were 18 words per minute lower than the norm for the third and fourth grades respectively, and 30 words per minute lower than the norm for the fifth grade. Reading speeds were significantly related to horizontal DEM times (r = −0.53, p < 0.0001). Thus, children showing a longer, or worse, horizontal DEM time achieved lower reading speeds.

Conclusions

Poor readers showed poor horizontal scanning as assessed by the DEM test that was related to a slow reading speed. This test should be used by optometric clinicians as a screening tool to help identify poor reading skills in school children at an early stage.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vogel G (1995) Saccadic eye movements: theory, testing & therapy. J Behav Optom 6:3–12 Vogel G (1995) Saccadic eye movements: theory, testing & therapy. J Behav Optom 6:3–12
4.
go back to reference Garzia R, Richman J, Nicholson S, Gaines C (1990) A new visual verbal saccade test. The Developmental Eye Movement test (DEM). J Am Optom Assoc 61:124–135PubMed Garzia R, Richman J, Nicholson S, Gaines C (1990) A new visual verbal saccade test. The Developmental Eye Movement test (DEM). J Am Optom Assoc 61:124–135PubMed
5.
go back to reference Poynter H, Schor C, Haynes H, Hirsch J (1982) Oculomotor functions in reading disability. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 59:116–127PubMed Poynter H, Schor C, Haynes H, Hirsch J (1982) Oculomotor functions in reading disability. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 59:116–127PubMed
9.
go back to reference Richman J, Garzia R (1987) Developmental Eye Movement Test, version 1. Bernel Corp, South Bend, IN, USA Richman J, Garzia R (1987) Developmental Eye Movement Test, version 1. Bernel Corp, South Bend, IN, USA
13.
go back to reference McMahon TT, Hansen M, Viana M (1991) Fixation characteristics in macular disease. Relationship between saccadic frequency, sequencing, and reading rate. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32:567–574PubMed McMahon TT, Hansen M, Viana M (1991) Fixation characteristics in macular disease. Relationship between saccadic frequency, sequencing, and reading rate. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32:567–574PubMed
15.
go back to reference Cuetos F, Rodriguez B, Ruano E (2000). Evaluación de los procesos lectores PROLEC, (Madrid). Cuetos F, Rodriguez B, Ruano E (2000). Evaluación de los procesos lectores PROLEC, (Madrid).
16.
go back to reference Ramos J, Cuetos F (1999). Evaluación de los procesos lectores PROLEC-SE, (Madrid). Ramos J, Cuetos F (1999). Evaluación de los procesos lectores PROLEC-SE, (Madrid).
18.
go back to reference Rouse M (2006) Optometric assessment: visual efficiency problems. In: Scheiman M, Rouse M (eds) Optometric management of learning-related vision problems, 2nd edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 335–367 Rouse M (2006) Optometric assessment: visual efficiency problems. In: Scheiman M, Rouse M (eds) Optometric management of learning-related vision problems, 2nd edn. Mosby Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 335–367
19.
go back to reference Sprenger-Charolles L, Siegel L, Bèchennec D, Serniclaes W (2003) Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading and in spelling: a four-year longitudinal study. J Exp Child Psychol 84:194–217, doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00024-9 PubMedCrossRef Sprenger-Charolles L, Siegel L, Bèchennec D, Serniclaes W (2003) Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading and in spelling: a four-year longitudinal study. J Exp Child Psychol 84:194–217, doi:10.​1016/​S0022-0965(03)00024-9 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Relationship between oculomotor scanning determined by the DEM test and a contextual reading test in schoolchildren with reading difficulties
Authors
Catalina Palomo-Álvarez
María C. Puell
Publication date
01-09-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 9/2009
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1076-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2009

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 9/2009 Go to the issue