Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 4/2011

01-08-2011

Relationship Between Age of Hearing-Loss Onset, Hearing-Loss Duration, and Speech Recognition in Individuals with Severe-to-Profound High-Frequency Hearing Loss

Authors: Fabien Seldran, Stéphane Gallego, Christophe Micheyl, Evelyne Veuillet, Eric Truy, Hung Thai-Van

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The factors responsible for interindividual differences in speech-understanding ability among hearing-impaired listeners are not well understood. Although audibility has been found to account for some of this variability, other factors may play a role. This study sought to examine whether part of the large interindividual variability of speech-recognition performance in individuals with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss could be accounted for by differences in hearing-loss onset type (early, progressive, or sudden), age at hearing-loss onset, or hearing-loss duration. Other potential factors including age, hearing thresholds, speech-presentation levels, and speech audibility were controlled. Percent-correct (PC) scores for syllables in dissyllabic words, which were either unprocessed or lowpass filtered at cutoff frequencies ranging from 250 to 2,000 Hz, were measured in 20 subjects (40 ears) with severe-to-profound hearing losses above 1 kHz. For comparison purposes, 20 normal-hearing subjects (20 ears) were also tested using the same filtering conditions and a range of speech levels (10–80 dB SPL). Significantly higher asymptotic PCs were observed in the early (<=4 years) hearing-loss onset group than in both the progressive- and sudden-onset groups, even though the three groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, hearing thresholds, or speech audibility. In addition, significant negative correlations between PC and hearing-loss onset age, and positive correlations between PC and hearing-loss duration were observed. These variables accounted for a greater proportion of the variance in speech-intelligibility scores than, and were not significantly correlated with, speech audibility, as quantified using a variant of the articulation index. Although the lack of statistical independence between hearing-loss onset type, hearing-loss onset age, hearing-loss duration, and age complicate and limit the interpretation of the results, these findings indicate that other variables than audibility can influence speech intelligibility in listeners with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference ANSI (1969) American National Standard methods for the calculation of the speech intelligibility index, ANSI S3.5-1969. ANSI, New York ANSI (1969) American National Standard methods for the calculation of the speech intelligibility index, ANSI S3.5-1969. ANSI, New York
go back to reference ANSI (1997) American National Standard methods for the calculation of the speech intelligibility index, ANSI S3.5-1997. ANSI, New York ANSI (1997) American National Standard methods for the calculation of the speech intelligibility index, ANSI S3.5-1997. ANSI, New York
go back to reference Baer T, Moore BC, Kluk K (2002) Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 112:1133–1144PubMedCrossRef Baer T, Moore BC, Kluk K (2002) Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 112:1133–1144PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J, Facer G, Larky J, Lindstrom B, Nedzelski J, Peterson A, Shipp D, Staller S, Whitford L (1996) Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 1:293–306PubMedCrossRef Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J, Facer G, Larky J, Lindstrom B, Nedzelski J, Peterson A, Shipp D, Staller S, Whitford L (1996) Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 1:293–306PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Busby PA, Tong YC, Clark GM (1992) Psychophysical studies using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant in patients who were deafened early in life. Audiology 31:95–111PubMedCrossRef Busby PA, Tong YC, Clark GM (1992) Psychophysical studies using a multiple-electrode cochlear implant in patients who were deafened early in life. Audiology 31:95–111PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Busby PA, Tong YC, Clark GM (1993) Electrode position, repetition rate, and speech perception by early- and late-deafened cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 93:1058–1067PubMedCrossRef Busby PA, Tong YC, Clark GM (1993) Electrode position, repetition rate, and speech perception by early- and late-deafened cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 93:1058–1067PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ching TY, Dillon H, Byrne D (1998) Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1128–1140PubMedCrossRef Ching TY, Dillon H, Byrne D (1998) Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1128–1140PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dawson PW, Blamey PJ, Rowland LC, Dettman SJ, Clark GM, Busby PA, Brown AM, Dowell RC, Rickards FW (1992) Cochlear implants in children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults: speech perception. J Speech Hear Res 35:401–417PubMed Dawson PW, Blamey PJ, Rowland LC, Dettman SJ, Clark GM, Busby PA, Brown AM, Dowell RC, Rickards FW (1992) Cochlear implants in children, adolescents, and prelinguistically deafened adults: speech perception. J Speech Hear Res 35:401–417PubMed
go back to reference Dubno JR, Dirks DD, Ellison DE (1989a) Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: the contribution of selected frequency regions. J Acoust Soc Am 85:347–354PubMedCrossRef Dubno JR, Dirks DD, Ellison DE (1989a) Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: the contribution of selected frequency regions. J Acoust Soc Am 85:347–354PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dubno JR, Dirks DD, Schaefer AB (1989b) Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: articulation index predictions. J Acoust Soc Am 85:355–364PubMedCrossRef Dubno JR, Dirks DD, Schaefer AB (1989b) Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: articulation index predictions. J Acoust Soc Am 85:355–364PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Efron B, Tibshirani R (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York Efron B, Tibshirani R (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York
go back to reference Fisher RA (1915) Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples of an indefinitely large population. Biometrika 10:507–521 Fisher RA (1915) Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples of an indefinitely large population. Biometrika 10:507–521
go back to reference Fisher RA (1924) The distribution of the partial correlation coefficient. Metron 3:329–332 Fisher RA (1924) The distribution of the partial correlation coefficient. Metron 3:329–332
go back to reference Fournier JE (1951) Audiométrie vocale. Maloine, Paris Fournier JE (1951) Audiométrie vocale. Maloine, Paris
go back to reference French NR, Steinberg JC (1947) Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 19:90–119CrossRef French NR, Steinberg JC (1947) Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 19:90–119CrossRef
go back to reference Friedland DR, Venick HS, Niparko JK (2003) Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance. Otol Neurotol 24:582–589PubMedCrossRef Friedland DR, Venick HS, Niparko JK (2003) Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance. Otol Neurotol 24:582–589PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Knutson JF, Abbas PJ, Tyler RS (1993) Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 102:909–916PubMed Gantz BJ, Woodworth GG, Knutson JF, Abbas PJ, Tyler RS (1993) Multivariate predictors of audiological success with multichannel cochlear implants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 102:909–916PubMed
go back to reference Gantz BJ, Hansen MR, Turner CW, Oleson JJ, Reiss LA, Parkinson AJ (2009) Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results. Audiol Neurootol 14(Suppl 1):32–38PubMed Gantz BJ, Hansen MR, Turner CW, Oleson JJ, Reiss LA, Parkinson AJ (2009) Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results. Audiol Neurootol 14(Suppl 1):32–38PubMed
go back to reference Gordon-Salant S (2005) Hearing loss and aging: new research findings and clinical implications. J Rehabil Res Dev 42(Suppl 2):9–24PubMedCrossRef Gordon-Salant S (2005) Hearing loss and aging: new research findings and clinical implications. J Rehabil Res Dev 42(Suppl 2):9–24PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Green DM, Dai HP (1991) Probability of being correct with 1 of M orthogonal signals. Percept Psychophys 49:100–101PubMedCrossRef Green DM, Dai HP (1991) Probability of being correct with 1 of M orthogonal signals. Percept Psychophys 49:100–101PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Green KMJ, Bhatt YM, Mawman DJ, O’Driscoll MP, Saeed SR, Ramsden RT, Green MW (2007) Predictors of audiological outcome following cochlear implantation in adults. Cochlear Implants Int 8:1–11PubMedCrossRef Green KMJ, Bhatt YM, Mawman DJ, O’Driscoll MP, Saeed SR, Ramsden RT, Green MW (2007) Predictors of audiological outcome following cochlear implantation in adults. Cochlear Implants Int 8:1–11PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hinderink JB, Mens LH, Brokx JP, van den Broek P (1995) Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 105:618–622PubMedCrossRef Hinderink JB, Mens LH, Brokx JP, van den Broek P (1995) Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 105:618–622PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hogan CA, Turner CW (1998) High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 104:432–441PubMedCrossRef Hogan CA, Turner CW (1998) High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 104:432–441PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Irvine DR, Rajan R (1996) Injury- and use-related plasticity in the primary sensory cortex of adult mammals: possible relationship to perceptual learning. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 23:939–947PubMedCrossRef Irvine DR, Rajan R (1996) Injury- and use-related plasticity in the primary sensory cortex of adult mammals: possible relationship to perceptual learning. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 23:939–947PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Irvine DR, Rajan R, Brown M (2001) Injury- and use-related plasticity in adult auditory cortex. Audiol Neurootol 6:192–195PubMedCrossRef Irvine DR, Rajan R, Brown M (2001) Injury- and use-related plasticity in adult auditory cortex. Audiol Neurootol 6:192–195PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kamm CA, Dirks DD, Bell TS (1985) Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 77:281–288PubMedCrossRef Kamm CA, Dirks DD, Bell TS (1985) Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 77:281–288PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kessler DK, Loeb GE, Barker MJ (1995) Distribution of speech recognition results with the Clarion cochlear prothesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 166:283–285 Kessler DK, Loeb GE, Barker MJ (1995) Distribution of speech recognition results with the Clarion cochlear prothesis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 166:283–285
go back to reference Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (2009) Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 29:14077–14085PubMedCrossRef Kujawa SG, Liberman MC (2009) Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci 29:14077–14085PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Leung J, Wang NY, Yeagle JD, Chinnici J, Bowditch S, Francis HW, Niparko JK (2005) Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:1049–1054PubMedCrossRef Leung J, Wang NY, Yeagle JD, Chinnici J, Bowditch S, Francis HW, Niparko JK (2005) Predictive models for cochlear implantation in elderly candidates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131:1049–1054PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (2005) Detection theory: a user’s guide. Erlbaum, Mahwah Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (2005) Detection theory: a user’s guide. Erlbaum, Mahwah
go back to reference McDermott HJ, Lech M, Kornblum MS, Irvine DRF (1998) Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity. J Acoust Soc Am 104:2314–2325PubMedCrossRef McDermott HJ, Lech M, Kornblum MS, Irvine DRF (1998) Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity. J Acoust Soc Am 104:2314–2325PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moore BCJ, Vinay SN (2009) Enhanced discrimination of low-frequency sounds for subjects with high-frequency dead regions. Brain 132:524–536PubMedCrossRef Moore BCJ, Vinay SN (2009) Enhanced discrimination of low-frequency sounds for subjects with high-frequency dead regions. Brain 132:524–536PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moore BCJ, Glasberg B, Schlueter A (2010) Detection of dead regions in the cochlea: relevance for combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 67:43–50PubMed Moore BCJ, Glasberg B, Schlueter A (2010) Detection of dead regions in the cochlea: relevance for combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 67:43–50PubMed
go back to reference Murray N, Byrne D (1986) Performance of hearing-impaired and normal hearing listeners with various high-frequency cut-offs in hearing aids. Aust J Audiol 8:21–28 Murray N, Byrne D (1986) Performance of hearing-impaired and normal hearing listeners with various high-frequency cut-offs in hearing aids. Aust J Audiol 8:21–28
go back to reference Niemeyer W (1972) Studies on speech perception in dissociated hearing loss. In: Fant G (ed) International symposium on speech communication ability and profound deafness. The Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf, Inc. pp 106–118 Niemeyer W (1972) Studies on speech perception in dissociated hearing loss. In: Fant G (ed) International symposium on speech communication ability and profound deafness. The Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf, Inc. pp 106–118
go back to reference Okazawa H, Naito Y, Yonekura Y, Sadato N, Hirano S, Nishizawa S, Magata Y, Ishizu K, Tamaki N, Honjo I, Konishi J (1996) Cochlear implant efficiency in pre- and postlingually deaf subjects. A study with H 2 15 O and PET. Brain 119:1297–1306PubMedCrossRef Okazawa H, Naito Y, Yonekura Y, Sadato N, Hirano S, Nishizawa S, Magata Y, Ishizu K, Tamaki N, Honjo I, Konishi J (1996) Cochlear implant efficiency in pre- and postlingually deaf subjects. A study with H 2 15 O and PET. Brain 119:1297–1306PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Palmer CV, Nelson CT, Lindley GA (1998) The functionally and physiologically plastic adult auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1705–1721PubMedCrossRef Palmer CV, Nelson CT, Lindley GA (1998) The functionally and physiologically plastic adult auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1705–1721PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pavlovic CV (1984) Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am 75:1253–1258PubMedCrossRef Pavlovic CV (1984) Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am 75:1253–1258PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rajan R, Irvine DR, Wise LZ, Heil P (1993) Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation of lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex. J Comp Neurol 338:17–49PubMedCrossRef Rajan R, Irvine DR, Wise LZ, Heil P (1993) Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation of lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex. J Comp Neurol 338:17–49PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rankovic CM (1991) An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting. J Speech Hear Res 34:391–402PubMed Rankovic CM (1991) An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting. J Speech Hear Res 34:391–402PubMed
go back to reference Rankovic CM (1998) Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1043–1057PubMedCrossRef Rankovic CM (1998) Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1043–1057PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rankovic CM (2002) Articulation index predictions for hearing-impaired listeners with and without cochlear dead regions. J Acoust Soc Am 111:2545–2548PubMedCrossRef Rankovic CM (2002) Articulation index predictions for hearing-impaired listeners with and without cochlear dead regions. J Acoust Soc Am 111:2545–2548PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rhodes RC (1966) Discrimination of filtered CNC lists by normals and hypacusics. J Aud Res 6:129–133 Rhodes RC (1966) Discrimination of filtered CNC lists by normals and hypacusics. J Aud Res 6:129–133
go back to reference Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ (1999) Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol 20:445–452PubMed Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ (1999) Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol 20:445–452PubMed
go back to reference Shipp DB, Nedzelski J (1995) Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:194–196PubMed Shipp DB, Nedzelski J (1995) Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:194–196PubMed
go back to reference Thai-Van H, Micheyl C, Norena A, Veuillet E, Gabriel D, Collet L (2007) Enhanced frequency discrimination in hearing-impaired individuals: a review of perceptual correlates of central neural plasticity induced by cochlear damage. Hear Res 233:14–22PubMedCrossRef Thai-Van H, Micheyl C, Norena A, Veuillet E, Gabriel D, Collet L (2007) Enhanced frequency discrimination in hearing-impaired individuals: a review of perceptual correlates of central neural plasticity induced by cochlear damage. Hear Res 233:14–22PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tong YC, Busby PA, Clark GM (1988) Perceptual studies on cochlear implant patients with early onset of profound hearing impairment prior to normal development of auditory, speech, and language skills. J Acoust Soc Am 84:951–962PubMedCrossRef Tong YC, Busby PA, Clark GM (1988) Perceptual studies on cochlear implant patients with early onset of profound hearing impairment prior to normal development of auditory, speech, and language skills. J Acoust Soc Am 84:951–962PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Turner CW, Bentler RA (1998) Does hearing aid benefit increase over time? J Acoust Soc Am 104:3673–3674PubMedCrossRef Turner CW, Bentler RA (1998) Does hearing aid benefit increase over time? J Acoust Soc Am 104:3673–3674PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Turner CW, Humes LE, Bentler RA, Cox RM (1996) A review of the literature on hearing aid benefit as a function of time. Ear Hear 17:14S–28SPubMedCrossRef Turner CW, Humes LE, Bentler RA, Cox RM (1996) A review of the literature on hearing aid benefit as a function of time. Ear Hear 17:14S–28SPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Van Dijk JE, van Olphen AF, Langereis MC, Mens LHM, Brokx JPL, Smoorenburg GF (1999) Predictors of cochlear implant performance. Audiology 38:109–116PubMedCrossRef Van Dijk JE, van Olphen AF, Langereis MC, Mens LHM, Brokx JPL, Smoorenburg GF (1999) Predictors of cochlear implant performance. Audiology 38:109–116PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vestergaard MD (2003) Dead regions in the cochlea: implications for speech recognition and applicability of articulation index theory. Int J Audiol 42:249–261PubMedCrossRef Vestergaard MD (2003) Dead regions in the cochlea: implications for speech recognition and applicability of articulation index theory. Int J Audiol 42:249–261PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vickers DA, Moore BC, Baer T (2001) Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 110:1164–1175PubMedCrossRef Vickers DA, Moore BC, Baer T (2001) Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 110:1164–1175PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Relationship Between Age of Hearing-Loss Onset, Hearing-Loss Duration, and Speech Recognition in Individuals with Severe-to-Profound High-Frequency Hearing Loss
Authors
Fabien Seldran
Stéphane Gallego
Christophe Micheyl
Evelyne Veuillet
Eric Truy
Hung Thai-Van
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-011-0261-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 4/2011 Go to the issue