Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1/2018

01-03-2018 | Scientific Contribution

Relational autonomy in informed consent (RAIC) as an ethics of care approach to the concept of informed consent

Author: Peter I. Osuji

Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The perspectives of the dominant Western ethical theories, have dominated the concepts of autonomy and informed consent for many years. Recently this dominant understanding has been challenged by ethics of care which, although, also emanates from the West presents a more nuanced concept: relational autonomy, which is more faithful to our human experience. By paying particular attention to relational autonomy, particularity and Process approach to ethical deliberations in ethics of care, this paper seeks to construct a concept of informed consent from the perspective of ethics of care which is here called relational autonomy-in-informed consent (RAIC). Thus, providing a broader theoretical basis for informed consent beyond the usual theoretical perspectives that are particularly Western. Care ethics provides such a broader basis because it appeals to a global perspective that encompasses lessons from other cultures, and this will help to enrich the current ideas of bioethics principles of autonomy and informed consent. This objective will be achieved by exploring the ethics of care emphasis on relationships based on a universal experience of caring; and by contrasting its concept of autonomy as relational with the understanding of autonomy in the approaches of the dominant moral theories that reflect rational, individualistic, and rights-oriented autonomy of the American liberalism.
Footnotes
1
Being an emerging moral theory, ethics of care is not yet considered as one of the dominant moral theories. That is why some authors such as Marian Verkerk prefer to call it “a moral perspective or orientation”.
 
2
There is constant need to cultivate the virtues appropriate to the practices of care and of moral evaluation of how the practices are being carried out. (Held 2006, 37).
 
3
For a comprehensive summary of the critique of the contractists, see Peter I. Osuji, (2014, 73) ff, Annette Baier (1997), and Held (1993).
 
Literature
go back to reference Baier, Annette. 1997. The need for more than justice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13: 41–56. Baier, Annette. 1997. The need for more than justice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13: 41–56.
go back to reference Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press. Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Bentham, Jeremy. 1970. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ed. J.H. Burns and H.L.A. Hart. Oxford: Clarendon. Bentham, Jeremy. 1970. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ed. J.H. Burns and H.L.A. Hart. Oxford: Clarendon.
go back to reference Bubeck, Diemut E. 1995. Care, Gender, and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Bubeck, Diemut E. 1995. Care, Gender, and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Chan, Sin Yee. 1993. An ethic of loving: ethical particularism and the engaged perspective in confucian role-ethics. PhD. diss., University of Michigan. Chan, Sin Yee. 1993. An ethic of loving: ethical particularism and the engaged perspective in confucian role-ethics. PhD. diss., University of Michigan.
go back to reference Cooney, William. 1998. Rights Theory. In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, ed. Ruth F Chadwick. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Cooney, William. 1998. Rights Theory. In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, ed. Ruth F Chadwick. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
go back to reference Dworkin, Ronald M. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Dworkin, Ronald M. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Feinberg, Joe. 1973. Social Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Feinberg, Joe. 1973. Social Philosophy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
go back to reference Friedmans, Marilyn. 2000. Autonomy, Social Disruption, and Women. In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, ed. Catriona Mackenzie, and Natalie Stoljar, 35–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Friedmans, Marilyn. 2000. Autonomy, Social Disruption, and Women. In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, ed. Catriona Mackenzie, and Natalie Stoljar, 35–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Gelfand, Scott D. 2004. The ethics of care and (capital?) punishment. Law and Philosophy 23 (6): 593–614. Gelfand, Scott D. 2004. The ethics of care and (capital?) punishment. Law and Philosophy 23 (6): 593–614.
go back to reference Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Griffin, James. 1986. Well-Being: Its Meaning. Measurement and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon. Griffin, James. 1986. Well-Being: Its Meaning. Measurement and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon.
go back to reference Hegel, Georg Wilhelm F. 1942. Philosophy of Right (trans: Knox, T.M.). Oxford: Clarendon. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm F. 1942. Philosophy of Right (trans: Knox, T.M.). Oxford: Clarendon.
go back to reference Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Held, Virginia. 1993. Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Held, Virginia. 2006. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. New York: Oxford University Press. Held, Virginia. 2006. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Kant, Immanuel. 2005. Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals. (trans: Abbott, Thomas Kingsmill and Stilwell, K.S.). Boston: Digireads. Kant, Immanuel. 2005. Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals. (trans: Abbott, Thomas Kingsmill and Stilwell, K.S.). Boston: Digireads.
go back to reference Koehn, Daryl. 1998. Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care Trust and Empathy. London: Routledge. Koehn, Daryl. 1998. Rethinking Feminist Ethics: Care Trust and Empathy. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Leithart, Peter J. 1988. Review: Alasdair Maclntyre: Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1988. Westminster Theological Journal 50: 416–419. Leithart, Peter J. 1988. Review: Alasdair Maclntyre: Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1988. Westminster Theological Journal 50: 416–419.
go back to reference Little, Margaret Olivia. 1998. Care, from theory to orientation and back. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (2): 190–209.CrossRef Little, Margaret Olivia. 1998. Care, from theory to orientation and back. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (2): 190–209.CrossRef
go back to reference MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1988. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1988. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.
go back to reference Maier, Barbara, Warren A. Shibles. 2011. The Philosophy and Practice of Medicine and Bioethics: A Naturalistic-Humanistic Approach. (International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine 47). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.CrossRef Maier, Barbara, Warren A. Shibles. 2011. The Philosophy and Practice of Medicine and Bioethics: A Naturalistic-Humanistic Approach. (International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine 47). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Meyers, Diana T., ed. 1997. Feminists Rethink the Self, [Feminist Theory and Politics Series]. Boulder, CO: Westview. Meyers, Diana T., ed. 1997. Feminists Rethink the Self, [Feminist Theory and Politics Series]. Boulder, CO: Westview.
go back to reference Meyers, Diana Tietjens. 2000. Intersectional Identity and the Authentic Self: Opposites Attract! In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, ed. Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie, 175–180. New York: Oxford University. Meyers, Diana Tietjens. 2000. Intersectional Identity and the Authentic Self: Opposites Attract! In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, ed. Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie, 175–180. New York: Oxford University.
go back to reference Moore, George Edward. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Moore, George Edward. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
go back to reference Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1989. Reconceiving autonomy: sources, thoughts, and possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1: 7–36. Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1989. Reconceiving autonomy: sources, thoughts, and possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1: 7–36.
go back to reference Osuji, Peter I. 2014. African Traditional Medicine: Autonomy and Informed Consent. New York: Springer. Osuji, Peter I. 2014. African Traditional Medicine: Autonomy and Informed Consent. New York: Springer.
go back to reference Paley, John. 2002. Virtue of autonomy: the Kantian ethic of care. Nursing Philosophy 3: 133–143.CrossRef Paley, John. 2002. Virtue of autonomy: the Kantian ethic of care. Nursing Philosophy 3: 133–143.CrossRef
go back to reference Paulsen, Jens Erik. 2011. Ethics of caring and professional roles. Nursing Ethics 18 (2): 201–208.CrossRef Paulsen, Jens Erik. 2011. Ethics of caring and professional roles. Nursing Ethics 18 (2): 201–208.CrossRef
go back to reference Po-wah, Julia Tao Lai. 2002. Is just caring possible? challenge to bioethics in the new century. In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the (Im)Possibility of Global Bioethics, ed. Julia, Tao Lai Po-wah, 41–58. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publication.CrossRef Po-wah, Julia Tao Lai. 2002. Is just caring possible? challenge to bioethics in the new century. In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the (Im)Possibility of Global Bioethics, ed. Julia, Tao Lai Po-wah, 41–58. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publication.CrossRef
go back to reference Pullman, Daryl. 1999. The ethics of autonomy and dignity in long-term care. Canadian Journal of Aging 18 (1): 26–46.CrossRef Pullman, Daryl. 1999. The ethics of autonomy and dignity in long-term care. Canadian Journal of Aging 18 (1): 26–46.CrossRef
go back to reference Slote, Michael. 2003. Morals from Motives. Oxford: Oxford University. Slote, Michael. 2003. Morals from Motives. Oxford: Oxford University.
go back to reference Tadd, W. 1998. Nurses’ ethics. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, vol. 3. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Tadd, W. 1998. Nurses’ ethics. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, vol. 3. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
go back to reference Tronto, Joan C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethics of Care. New York: Routledge. Tronto, Joan C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethics of Care. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Vanlaere, Linus, and Chris Gastmans. 2011. A personalist approach to care ethics. Nursing Ethics 18 (2): 161–173.CrossRef Vanlaere, Linus, and Chris Gastmans. 2011. A personalist approach to care ethics. Nursing Ethics 18 (2): 161–173.CrossRef
go back to reference Verkerk, Marian A. 2001. The care perspective and autonomy. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 4 (3): 289–294.CrossRef Verkerk, Marian A. 2001. The care perspective and autonomy. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 4 (3): 289–294.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Relational autonomy in informed consent (RAIC) as an ethics of care approach to the concept of informed consent
Author
Peter I. Osuji
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1386-7423
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8633
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9789-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1/2018 Go to the issue